There is nothing you can say to me that will offend me.
The thread is about woke culture... What am I supposed to post about in this thread then?
It was pretty fucking obvious Iraq didn't have WMDs, it's wasn't like a 50/50 chance they did or didn't. If journalists actually did their job they'd know that. WaPo is obviously a very bias paper and that's not very democratic, now is it?
www.ft.com
...what does this even mean?
Per 100,000 infections, rabies and Ebola are much more dangerous than covid, yet covid remains far more deadly than those two. This is because covid infects far more people, which is a major factor in it's deadliness.Since people here seem to not be able to go this this page for some reason (due to needing a subscription) even though I can for whatever reason, here's the screen grab and url as well. Covid became less deadly this year than the flu according to official ONS data (UK Office of National Statistics).
View attachment 7651Vaccines and Omicron mean Covid now less deadly than flu in England
Recent rise in hospital admissions shows decision to end restrictions still carries risks
Says one of the most easily offended people on this forum.
If you truly didn't care, you wouldn't be bitching up a storm about things like "latinx" completely unprovoked.
As opposed to... the rest of the news/papers? Around the country? Because they all did it. They were all biased. And, ANY news group were cancelled if they did not report that the WMD were real by the general US public. CNN, FOX, MSNBC, NYT all did the same was what WaPo did. None of them have shown any inkling that they think they did something wrong
I mean, I already stated that you didn't do any introspection. You didn't ACTUALLY have to prove. It wasn't necessary. But thanks anywaySince people here seem to not be able to go this this page for some reason (due to needing a subscription) even though I can for whatever reason, here's the screen grab and url as well. Covid became less deadly this year than the flu according to official ONS data (UK Office of National Statistics).
View attachment 7651Vaccines and Omicron mean Covid now less deadly than flu in England
Recent rise in hospital admissions shows decision to end restrictions still carries risks
It means someone is trying to rewrite history and pretends everyone knew there were no WMDs. Which is not real until Iraq was already taken over
Eh, it was pretty clear there weren't WMDs before the war, it suddenly only became an issue when the US and UK wanted a war (IIRC, it came after Al-Qaeda was there and before liberating the people), and UN weapon inspectors said there weren't. Also, you know what happens to countries that have WMDs that can hit London within 45 minutes or whatever? The UK doesn't attack them. OTOH, you had to ignore all the media and the leaders of the UK and US to hold to that opinion.
Dude, Phoenixmgs' word is law - Everything he says is the most truest thing of all in the history of all of everything.
The joke used to be that the only person who thought Iraq had WMDs was Saddam Hussein.
That surely led them to not look very hard, like when you're pretending to help someone find a T-shirt you know you threw away because you don't like it and you thought they'd just forget it existed.
Nah, apparently they had a shitton of stuff to do everytime they went some place and had to document everything, so they all ended up with a lot of photos of them posing with piles of shitty captured hardware.
There was never any legit intelligence that said Iraq had WMDs.
You're the one that gets mad when I discuss suicides...
The news didn't report objectively on the WMDs because there was no legit intelligence that said they had any. I knew they didn't have any because I did a report on Iraq for school like a year or so before. Maybe they had some super secret facility that they could make some but it would be super slow production. That would be worse case scenario. No reason to invade. Do you not know what the actual truth of the WMD debacle was?
The fuck I'm getting the flu, I'm vaccinated like a sane person (yes, yes, it doesn't protect against every flu)
Are you for fucking real right now? You're criticising somebody who has personal, relevant experience for taking it to heart when you chat shit about suicide?
I mean, have you been reading his posts? All he does is rage at the world for not valuing him above everything else the way he thinks he deserves.
It's not that, that's par for the course. But denigrating someone for objecting when he chats shit about suicide is sick, below what I'd expect.
Yes, people tend to get upset when you take serious emotional topics and try to use them as ammunition without even having enough empathy to pretend that you care about the actual human beings involved (beyond yourself, of course).
Then why the fuck is every government official coming out of the woodwork saying we need to investigate UFOs. It can't all be to confuse people into not taking pictures of NGAD.
