Funny events in anti-woke world

Dalisclock

Making lemons combustible again
Legacy
Escapist +
Feb 9, 2008
11,286
7,082
118
A Barrel In the Marketplace
Country
Eagleland
Gender
Male
  • Like
Reactions: Baffle and BrawlMan

Kwak

Elite Member
Sep 11, 2014
2,333
1,866
118
Country
4
This one is just baffling. Even if the story isn't particularly good, what the hell is "woke" about a story in which a guy gets pregnant?
Anything that subverts any gender stereotypes is "woke". (And wasn't it in the context of a dream, or a one off 'treehouse of horror' type thing anyway?)
 

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
16,871
9,553
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
  • Like
Reactions: bluegate

Ag3ma

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2023
2,574
2,208
118
Yeah, how dare Greece want their own historical artifacts back. Next thing you know Egypt will want theirs back and Rome will want theirs back and it'll be total mayhem.
"If we return everything we've stolen, we'll have nothing left. And then what will justify our smug sense of superiority?"
Greece is absolutely fine to want their historical artefacts back. The question is more whether the British Museum is morally or legally obliged to do so.

Irrespective of the OTT ramblings spouted by some second-rate nobody that's minister in a decayed and ineffectual administration, I don't think there is a clear case for Greece to demand their return. There are some significant issues about their acquistion - it is very much a grey area - but they are by no means on a par with war spoils from a conquered territory.

Elgin claims he had permission - if true, clear and uncontestable documents to this effect did not survive. However, he removed them over a period of years in clear sight of the legitimate owners, who did not complain or stop him throughout or afterwards, which strongly suggests that they did not have a problem with it. Where it gets tricky is that the legitimate owners of the time were the Ottoman Turks, who almost certainly didn't care about the British removing Greek cultural heritage in the same way that the Greeks do. As they'd ruled Athens for ~350 years at that point, I don't think we can meaningfully dispute the Ottomans as legitimate owners of the Parthenon.
 

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
9,049
3,037
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg
I wouldn't.

It's a well-made meat and two veg action film that will warm the cockles of many a patriotic, individualist, pro-military conservative. But there's nothing about it that is a rejection of woke either. The idea it's "anti-woke" is more the desperation of the anti-woke to claim some sort of cultural victory.
Yes, of course it is a claim to victory

The anti-woke crowd are looking for the white male lead only that makes sure that the white male is significantly better than the rest even.

A good story is not necessary

Also, I would take issue with it being patriotic and pro-military conservatives somewhat. Cruise's character has many criticism for the air force and how weak it's leadership now is. It had a weird suprerior turn up for five minutes to lay down how incompetent they all were right at the start of the movie and was never heard from again. It has SOME patrotism etc but couched in Cruise being the best and everyone also being incompetent

Edit: I want to note that something being woke or anti-woke is completely irrelevant to whether a story is good or not. Anyone who claims as such is just a moron. Even if Maverick is anti-woke that doesn't mean it's a bad movie or you cant enjoy it. Movie don't and never have worked like that
 
Last edited:

Kwak

Elite Member
Sep 11, 2014
2,333
1,866
118
Country
4



ROBEK: (Reading) Then, quickly, Sylvester McMonkey McBean put together a very peculiar machine. And he said, you want stars like a star-belly Sneetch? My friends, you can have them for $3 each.

BERAS: He sees an opportunity to profit.

ROBEK: (Reading) Then, of course, old Sylvester McMonkey McBean invited them into his star-off machine. Then, of course, from then on, as you probably guessed, things really got into a horrible mess.

BERAS: At this point, Amanda Beeman, the communications person with the school district, stands up. She looks really upset. She waves her hands to get Mrs. Robek's attention to stop reading.

AMANDA BEEMAN: Sorry.

UNIDENTIFIED STUDENT #1: They're scaring them because (ph)...

BEEMAN: Can I pause this?

ROBEK: Yeah.

BEEMAN: I don't know if I feel comfortable with book being one of the ones featured. I just feel like this isn't teaching anything about economics, and this is a little bit more about differences with race and everything like that. So do you mind, Mrs. Robek, if we pause this book.

BERAS: I mean, we have a list here of all the things this is about - preferences, open markets, economic loss.

BEEMAN: Yeah, I just don't think it might be appropriate for the third-grade class and for them to have a discussion around it. Are you OK with that?

ROBEK: I'm OK with that if that's your...

BEEMAN: OK. I just - as someone - I just don't think that this is going to be the discussion that we wanted to around economics. So I'm sorry. We're going to cut this one off.

BERAS: For the first time all day, the kids are really quiet. They sit still on the rug in their chairs, just staring up at the grown-ups in the room.

BEEMAN: So is there anything else that we can pivot to?

ROBEK: I have lots of books.

BERAS: Then, the kids start asking how the story ends. Amanda, the press person, addresses them in kid talk.

BEEMAN: Sometimes, when you don't feel comfortable, you got something in your belly, you got to just speak up about it, right?

UNIDENTIFIED STUDENT #2: Yeah.

UNIDENTIFIED STUDENT #3: Yeah.

UNIDENTIFIED STUDENT #4: I don't even know what happens in the story.

UNIDENTIFIED STUDENT #5: Yeah, me neither.

UNIDENTIFIED STUDENT #4: Like, I want to read it (ph) - haven't ever read that.

BEEMAN: You know what? I think that's one that maybe we can ask, you know, with our parents at home.

BERAS: And that's it. Our final lesson abruptly ends. I pack up my things, say goodbye to the kids, and leave. One of the economists who recommended "The Sneetches" was Betsey Stevenson, a former chief economist at the U.S. Department of Labor, professor at the University of Michigan. So after I got back from Ohio, I called her up and told her what happened.

BETSEY STEVENSON: Wow. I mean, gosh, there's so much there that makes me sad. I mean, as you said, many people recommended "The Sneetches" as having a lot of economics in it. I mean, it's just a beautiful amount of economics.

BERAS: Betsey says my plan to keep politics and economics completely separate was never really going to work - not in the context of the story.

STEVENSON: I think economics is political. You know, we go back to the economic founders and - remember, you know, Adam Smith was a pioneer in political economy, right? So the field is about thinking about society and economy together.

BERAS: And that's what we were doing with the third-graders in the class that day - looking at how economics exists in the larger world and in the smaller worlds these kids inhabit because economics doesn't exist in a silo. Neither does education. A couple days after our trip to the class, I reached back out to Amanda Beeman at the Olentangy local school district to thank her, but also to ask what happened. The district responded in an email saying, among other things, quote, "school districts across the nation are being scrutinized for book selections in our schools on both sides of the spectrum," end quote. This very climate, Betsey Stevenson says, can make it hard to teach and talk about these ideas at any level.

STEVENSON: I think it's indicative of the challenges we're currently facing in our economic system and how we're struggling to come together to talk about them.

BERAS: The school district's communication person, Amanda Beeman, wrote, quote, "when the book began addressing racism, segregation and discriminating behaviors, this was not the conversation we had prepared Mrs. Robek, the students or parents would take place. There may be some very important economics lessons in The Sneetches, but I did not feel that those lessons were the themes students were going to grasp at that point in the day or in the book," end quote. So final lesson in our experiment teaching econ to third-graders - keeping politics entirely out of economics - really, really hard.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
 

Gordon_4

The Big Engine
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
6,437
5,693
118
Australia
Yes, of course it is a claim to victory

The anti-woke crowd are looking for the white male lead only that makes sure that the white male is significantly better than the rest even.

A good story is not necessary

Also, I would take issue with it being patriotic and pro-military conservatives somewhat. Cruise's character has many criticism for the air force and how weak it's leadership now is. It had a weird suprerior turn up for five minutes to lay down how incompetent they all were right at the start of the movie and was never heard from again. It has SOME patrotism etc but couched in Cruise being the best and everyone also being incompetent

Edit: I want to note that something being woke or anti-woke is completely irrelevant to whether a story is good or not. Anyone who claims as such is just a moron. Even if Maverick is anti-woke that doesn't mean it's a bad movie or you cant enjoy it. Movie don't and never have worked like that
Well. That is certainly a take. Also, Maverick - and by extension everyone else in a uniform - are in the Navy, not the Airforce.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dalisclock

The Rogue Wolf

Stealthy Carnivore
Legacy
Nov 25, 2007
16,871
9,553
118
Stalking the Digital Tundra
Gender
✅
...when the book began addressing racism, segregation and discriminating behaviors, this was not the conversation we had prepared Mrs. Robek, the students or parents would take place.
The conversation they wanted to have was "capitalism is great, go make lots of money, and there's no racism in my lily-white gated community so shut up about it".
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

XsjadoBlayde

~it ends here~
Apr 29, 2020
3,372
3,499
118

Aw they're budding bud buddies.

In early March 2020, as the coronavirus pandemic began its onslaught across the country, Fox News host Tucker Carlson drove to then-President Donald Trump’s Florida resort to warn him to take the virus seriously.

“People you know will get sick,” Carlson said on his show later that night after visiting Trump at Mar-a-Lago. “Some may die. This is real. That’s the point of this script — to tell you that.”

The surprising warning was noticed by Alex Jones, a far-right conspiracy theorist best known for spreading lies about the parents of dead children and hawking overpriced supplements on his platform, Infowars. Jones texted Carlson a link on March 16, 2020, to a now-deleted Infowars article titled “Tucker Carlson Drove To Mar-A-Lago To Warn Trump Coronavirus Was A Real Threat.”

The subhead read “Fox News host saves America.”

“I tried man,” Carlson texted Jones back, according to a record of their conversation obtained by HuffPost.

Yet by the following month, as Trump continued to minimize the seriousness of the virus, the two right-wing media personalities appeared to follow the president’s lead, texting conspiracy theories with each other that downplayed the threat even as thousands of Americans were dying daily.

Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson traded coronavirus conspiracy theories with each other at the height of the pandemic.


From Sept. 19, 2019, to May 1, 2020, Jones and Carlson discussed coronavirus conspiracy theories, traded a few jokes, and had at least one phone conversation after Jones expressed unfounded fears that Democrats were “working to get me arrested.” Jones also complained about The Daily Caller ― the right-wing publication founded by Carlson ― for not letting Infowars feature its content on the Infowars website.

“They won’t even take my money,” Jones whined to Carlson in a Jan. 15, 2020, text.

“Fucking crazy. I’m really sorry,” Carlson responded.

The texts were provided to HuffPost by Texas attorney Mark Bankston of the Houston law firm Farrar & Ball. Bankston confronted Jones in August after he obtained a copy of Jones’ cellphone during the Infowars owner’s first Sandy Hook defamation trial.

“Mr. Jones, did you know that 12 days ago, your attorneys messed up and sent me an entire digital copy of your entire cellphone, with every text message you’ve sent for the past two years?” Bankston asked Jones on the stand. “And when informed did not take any steps to identify those texts as privileged?”

Judge Guerra Gamble denied requests by Jones’ attorney, Andino Reynal, to have the messages sealed or destroyed. Reynal would later call it “the worst day of my legal career.”

HuffPost is publishing the full texts between Jones and Carlson, and has edited the pages to redact contact information (see below).

“We have always favored public transparency in this litigation, and we think it’s clear that these conversations between Mr. Jones and one of the nation’s most widely watched political pundits are newsworthy and a matter of genuine public interest,” Bankston told HuffPost in a statement.

The texts alone are not the bombshell some media reports had hinted at, and the nearly eight-month period doesn’t cover Trump’s election loss or the subsequent U.S. Capitol attack. Jones also appears to have deleted several of his messages in his conversations with Carlson, but the texts still offer a glimpse into the burgeoning relationship between the two.

Carlson has repeatedly embraced the harasser of grieving parents, and went so far as to call him a “journalist” on Fox News in 2019 (Jones is not a journalist). More recently, Carlson wrote a glowing review for Jones’ book, published in October.

“If Alex Jones is just a crackpot, why are the most powerful people in the country trying to silence him?” Carlson wrote for the blurb. “No one bothers to censor the flat-earthers. Maybe Alex Jones is onto something.”

In a phone call with HuffPost, Jones said Carlson “has already outed himself as an Alex Jones fan.”

“I know this is a whole guilt by association, get Tucker Carlson who talks to Alex Jones, but that’s my private friendship, so I’ll leave it at that,” Jones said, before expanding on their friendship.

Carlson did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Jones, who said he’s been friends with Carlson for 10 years, told HuffPost Carlson isn’t concerned with stories about him.

“He doesn’t give a flying fuck,” Jones said.

The new texts further illuminate the blurring of lines between mainstream right-wing mouthpieces and the conspiratorial purveyors of disinformation working to amplify lies.

‘We’ll Be China Soon’

Despite Carlson’s warning to the president, and his plea on his Fox News program for his audience to take the virus seriously, by April 2020 he appeared to be trading unfounded conspiracy theories with Jones.

Early on the morning of April 27, Jones texted Carlson a link to an Infowars article that complained about a pharmaceutical company that was briefly suspended from Twitter after it posted a video that depicted an experimental ultraviolet technology designed to kill the coronavirus. YouTube also removed the video from its website for promoting unsubstantiated claims, but not before the video racked up more than 17 million views.

The idea of using UV light to kill the virus was briefly touted after Trump talked about shining a “very powerful light” inside the body to kill the virus.

“The whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute, that’s ― that’s pretty powerful,” Trump said during a White House press conference at the time.

Carlson replied to Jones’ text within the hour.

“I saw this. They’re clamping down. We’ll be China soon,” Carlson warned.

“Trump could vindicate himself by covering it,” Jones replied. “That’s why they are taking it down as you know.”

Alex Jones texted Tucker Carlson in May 2020 to express concerns that Democrats were working to get me arrested.


That wasn’t why Twitter had taken down the unverified claim (Twitter said in March of that year that it would remove tweets about the virus that “could potentially cause harm”), but Carlson agreed with Jones’ Infowars article.

“I totally agree,” Carlson texted. “If they can do this during a pandemic, they’ll definitely do it during a presidential election.”

Earlier that month, Infowars held a rally in Austin, Texas, attended by Jones and hundreds of his followers, demanding businesses reopen at a time when it was still unclear how the virus spread and thousands were dying. He had also started selling fake coronavirus cures, including a toothpaste, to his rube audience, which eventually led the Food and Drug Administration to issue a warning telling Jones to knock it off.

None of that seemed to sour Carlson on his friend.

The next morning, on April 28, Jones sent Carlson another link, this time to a viral video of two California doctors who claimed the virus was no worse than influenza, and that death rates were low enough to reopen businesses. The doctors, who own and operate urgent care centers, are not epidemiologists, and made their estimates based on their clinics’ clients, not a sampling of the general population.

The video amassed millions of views and was eventually taken down from YouTube for disputing the guidance of local health authorities, and the American Academy of Emergency Medicine and the American College of Emergency Physicians issued a joint statement calling the doctors’ comments “reckless and untested musings.”

Carlson, who had already done a segment on the doctors the night before, didn’t seem to care that their claims hadn’t been verified, and once again appeared to be in sync with Jones.

“This is our lede tonight,” Carlson texted Jones back later that morning.

And it was. That night, Carlson told his audience that YouTube’s removal of the doctors’ false and dangerous claims was yet another case of “Big Tech” censoring truth-tellers.

“Looking back when all of this is finally over, and it will be, it’s likely we will see this moment ― what YouTube just did ― as a turning point in the way we live in this country,” he ranted. “A sharp break with 250 years of law and custom.”

By that point, the virus had killed 65,000 Americans.

Nearly two months later, on June 10, Dr. Dan Erickson ― one of the two doctors involved in spreading misinformation ― went on Carlson’s show and appeared to walk back his “data” in a word-salad defense.

“When we first came out with our data, [experts] said, ‘These are wildly inaccurate,’ and they were raw data, and currently we’re putting our data in a more scientific format so they can biostatistically analyze it and we can sort of regive the data in a different format.”

Erickson then added that you don’t get the “strongest opinions and strongest solutions to come to the surface if we just shout down and take people off the air that have opinions that differ from what the masses are saying.”

Carlson smirked.

“I’m smiling because you’re making a powerful case for what we used to call ‘diversity,’ which is no longer allowed,” he said. “The ironies mount.”

The death toll was then 115,000 Americans.

Democrats ‘Are Going To Crush Fox News’

On April 25, 2020, Jones appeared to seek Carlson’s approval when he texted an Infowars video of himself wearing a Facebook shirt and mock-apologizing to Mark Zuckerberg, the founder who kicked him off the platform in 2019. The video was titled “Alex Jones Signs HUGE Facebook Deal.”

When Carlson didn’t respond, Jones sent a follow-up text.

“Satire,” he clarified.

Carlson texted back seven hours later: “This is bitterly hilarious.”

It’s a common thread within the texts: Jones reaches out to Carlson hoping to get him to engage with Infowars content. And while Carlson could often be perfunctory with Jones in texts (“Tremendous” Carlson replied to a video Jones sent of himself voicing a digitally animated dragon with a racist Chinese accent), other times Carlson engaged in conversation with him.

For instance, Jones and Carlson texted on March 28 and March 31, but Jones appears to have deleted his side of the conversation. Jones told HuffPost he doesn’t remember if he deleted the messages or if Carlson’s texts could have been in response to prior phone conversations the two may have had.

“That’s just a snapshot of conversations, but I think it’s fair to say that most of the time I reach out to him,” Jones said. “I’m gonna leave it at that, but he’s not a big text guy.”

What remains are just Carlson’s responses, including one where he tells Jones ― who now owes more than $1 billion to the families of slain Sandy Hook victims whom Jones defamed for years ― that he should not have been kicked off social media.
“The clear indication is that there is at least some sort of editorial influence that Alex has — whether direct, indirect, even if it’s minimal — and it matters because Tucker is probably the most influential cable show host in the world, and Alex is a raving lunatic.”
- Dan Friesen, co-host of the Infowars analysis podcast “Knowledge Fight.”
“If Democrats win in November, they’re going to crush Fox News just as they’ve crushed the NRA. And we’re going to deeply regret letting it happen,” Carlson texted. “Everyone who thought it was fine that they deplatformed Alex Jones will look like a fucking moron.”

Dan Friesen is the co-host of the Infowars analysis podcast “Knowledge Fight” along with fellow comedian Jordan Holmes. The two have spent five years and more than 700 episodes staring into the abyss of the conspiracy theory program and reporting back their findings.

Friesen, who has reviewed the texts, told HuffPost the messages show a deeper familiarity between the two.

“It’s also that the power imbalance is pretty clear,” Friesen said. “You have a guy who is on top of his game [in the right-wing world] and someone who is not allowed on social media.”

It’s possible Jones has had an influence on Carlson, Friesen said.

“The clear indication is that there is at least some sort of editorial influence that Alex has ― whether direct, indirect, even if it’s minimal ― and it matters because Tucker is probably the most influential cable show host in the world, and Alex is a raving lunatic.”

Jones told HuffPost that he doesn’t need to “radicalize” Carlson.

“I’m not influencing Tucker Carlson,” Jones said. “The world is understanding that my worldview is closer to reality than mainstream media, so I don’t need to radicalize Tucker Carlson. He sees what’s going on in the world.”

‘Arrested? My Gosh.’

In their final messages obtained by HuffPost, Jones contacted Carlson on May 1, 2020, to share some “grave news.”

“Congratulations on being number one!” Jones texted. “I have some very grave news concerning the Democrats working to get me arrested. Hope we can talk today.”

Jones was never arrested, but just days earlier, on April 28 ― the same day he and Carlson texted about coronavirus misinformation ― Jones delivered one of his most unhinged and violent outbursts yet.

For years, Alex Jones and his conspiracy outlet Infowars amplified the lie that 20 kids and six adults weren't killed in the 2012 Newtown, Connecticut, shooting.



“I’m starting to think about having to eat my neighbors,” Jones said on Infowars days before telling Carlson he feared arrest. “You think I like sizing up my neighbor, how I’m going to haul him up by a chain and chop his ass up? I’ll do it.”

Jones continued:
“But, I’m literally looking at my neighbors now and going: ‘I’m ready to hang them up and gut them and skin them and chop them up.’ You know what? I’m ready. My daughters aren’t going to starve to death. I’ll eat my neighbors. When my babies come into the equation, I will cook your ass up so fast and I’ll tell them: ‘Oh, I killed a cow out back, baby.’ Here it is because my babies ain’t gonna die for your crap, your failure. I will eat your leftist ass like corn on the cob, I’m ready. I’ll barbecue your ass flat. I will eat you. I’ll drink your blood. You understand that? I will hang your ass up and cut you into cutlets like a filet mignon and grill your ass before I watch my daughters starve to death. Let me tell you something right now. I swear to God, if it’s the last thing I do, I’m going to get my hands around your throat.”
Three days after the broadcast in which Jones threatened to drink the blood of his neighbors, he hoped to talk to Fox News’ golden boy over the phone.

“Arrested? My gosh,” Carlson responded to Jones. “That’s out of control. Are you free this afternoon?”

Jones was free, but not before he went to his Infowars studio to defend his neighbor-eating comments.

Standing behind Infowars hosts Owen Shroyer and Harrison Smith, a visibly rattled Jones said he’d only been joking, comparing his comments to the 18th-century satire “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift.

“It’s the global collapse that will cause the eating of the neighbors,” he said, blinking his eyes rapidly. “I would never eat my neighbors. It’s an allegory of the collapse of society.”

He then accused “the left” of wanting to burn babies.

Following his appearance on Infowars, Jones got his phone call with Carlson. Jones told HuffPost the conversation was “probably about the eat-the-neighbor thing, but I really don’t remember.”

Carlson came away from the call apparently unwavering in his alliance with Jones.

“Great to talk to you,” Carlson texted. The two exchanged emails to keep in touch.
-




-

I'd forgotten Junior existed. I was happy in my forgetting. Now I remember I live in a world where Junior exists and I'm sad now.

Thanks XsjadoBlayde.
I empathise with your pain. However, it's these kinds of awful memories that we need to blast the nostalgia cobwebs away from as they can sometimes assist in the resistance against the effects of creeping dementia, errr, I assume. 🙏👌
 

Trunkage

Nascent Orca
Legacy
Jun 21, 2012
9,049
3,037
118
Brisbane
Gender
Cyborg
Well. That is certainly a take. Also, Maverick - and by extension everyone else in a uniform - are in the Navy, not the Airforce.
Point taken

I mean, just listen to what the Anti-woke people say. I don't know why people are shocked that a White Male lead, who was supposed to be just a teacher, forces everyone's hand so he could be the leader of mission because he's just that good isn't going to appeal to the anti-woke crowd. I mean, he's so good, he can do it on the firsr try, with no practice in a machine he hasn't piloted in decades

In a normal movie with a mentor, eventually (after many episodes of doubt in themselves or their students), the mentor finds the special spark in their students to help them complete an impossible mission. This has been repeat in many, many movies. The mentor isn't meant to complete take over. It makes all that time beforehand completely worthless.
 

Schadrach

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 20, 2010
2,173
421
88
Country
US
On a personal note, I've had two deaths in the family (one on my side, one on my wife's) and two other family members charged with domestic battery against each other in the last week. It's...not been the best start to a year.

My wife actually works for WV DHHR. Different department therein though.

If I told her Bill Crouch was behind something like that she wouldn't be surprised though. I've heard enough complaints about him for a lifetime.

So on top of Saudi Arabia funding Musk's takeover of Twitter apparently now they have wholly bought the WWE. Man, those freedom loving billionaires fucking love Saudi blood money.
It spends as well as any other, and they're too rich to care about silly things like the morality of where the money comes from.

This one is just baffling. Even if the story isn't particularly good, what the hell is "woke" about a story in which a guy gets pregnant?
If someone read no farther into it than "pregnant Joker" then they might have thought it was a trans thing?

Is Joker gonna shit out a baby?! Because that'd honestly be more interesting then he's been in years.
The premise involved him being cursed by Zatanna with something like "No one else will ever have the Joker's baby". The supervillain doctor he goes to is confused about the same thing you are, and he basically vomits it out, yielding a mini-me Joker.
 

Gordon_4

The Big Engine
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
6,437
5,693
118
Australia
On a personal note, I've had two deaths in the family (one on my side, one on my wife's) and two other family members charged with domestic battery against each other in the last week. It's...not been the best start to a year.



My wife actually works for WV DHHR. Different department therein though.

If I told her Bill Crouch was behind something like that she wouldn't be surprised though. I've heard enough complaints about him for a lifetime.



It spends as well as any other, and they're too rich to care about silly things like the morality of where the money comes from.



If someone read no farther into it than "pregnant Joker" then they might have thought it was a trans thing?


The premise involved him being cursed by Zatanna with something like "No one else will ever have the Joker's baby". The supervillain doctor he goes to is confused about the same thing you are, and he basically vomits it out, yielding a mini-me Joker.
Man, the writer’s room mull bowl must have been well stocked for that idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dalisclock

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
12,094
6,376
118
Country
United Kingdom
Man, the writer’s room mull bowl must have been well stocked for that idea.
As far as I understand it, it was intentionally evoking the sort of silver age comic book plot lines, in which wacky shit like this would happen (pink kryptonite turning Superman gay, for example). It's even drawn in a silver agey way to underline the connection.