Not openly, no. But that's why it's called stochastic terrorism.
At best these cunts give zero fucks whether their rhetoric leads to real world harm.
Funny events in anti-woke world
- Thread starter Agema
- Start date
At best these cunts give zero fucks whether their rhetoric leads to real world harm.
Rolling Stone's original headline was CPAC Speaker Calls for Transgender People to be 'Eradicated'.
It now says CPAC Speaker Calls for Eradication of 'Transgenderism'
Your chosen example is evidence that they are clearly aware of the distinction. They changed to remove the lie.
Yes... well... we did have a PM with what looked like a home made "i stopped these" boat trophy. The fucken twunt.
Come on, be honest, there are racists outside the Anglosphere who are also envious of our systemic abuse of refugees. The number of international laws and treaties we ignore is breathtaking.
Oh look, it's a coordinated effort that won't stop at the T. Everybody put on your shocked faces
www.motherjones.com
Same gal who leaked the No-Fly list is publishing the emails proving it, not that most rational needed the objective proof at this point
maia.crimew.gay
Inside the secret working group that helped push anti-trans laws across the country
Leaked emails give a glimpse of the religious-right networks behind transgender health care bans.
www.motherjones.com
Same gal who leaked the No-Fly list is publishing the emails proving it, not that most rational needed the objective proof at this point
the emails - 2600 pages of hate
a collection of emails from 2019-2021 between dozens of anti-trans expert witnesses, US right-wing lawmakers and conservative legal groups
maia.crimew.gay
"And somehow claims he's not calling for elimination of Transgender people".
That's the second half of the headline you clipped out, which makes it abundantly clear the publication considers his claimed distinction to be bollocks.
And the publication can say what they want about their own view, the first version lied about his.
I get the distinct impression I'm gonna be able to tell someone on this forum "I told you so"
I feel like both giving this quote a like and a dislike at the same time
Also, I believe we are up $20B now just to lock up 7000 people. What a clever way to spend money
Still better than this new version (I think 2019) where Leo is Mikey and deliberately puts people in danger for the lulz. Everyone is stupid, especially Splinter. Everyone lost their personality
Anyway,
I thought that an alien tried to take April over, not that she was part alien. She does have magic though
Can comfirm that this is true... certainly put the whole Uhygurs situation in China into perspective, doesn't it
You talking about Rise of TMNT? I'll give it credit for doing something different. I have not watched it yet though. From what I heard, the second season makes the show better, and most people (even haters of this specific series) like the movie. Both the series and Rise movie are on Netflix. Also, this scene is hilarious!
Nope. She's actually part alien in the 2012 series. My other problem with TMNT 2012 was stupid "romance" and later "love triangle" between Donnie, April, and Casey Jones. I didn't make that up! Not to mention in S1 & S2 especially; the writers did that stupid stalking is love cliche from Donnie's perspective. It's not shown in a negative light. In Season 1 as well, they made Raph too much of an asshole. Thankfully, later seasons fixed this, but like I said before, I stopped caring after Season 2.
Bet you didn't read the bill. Bet the person on Twitter didn't either.
The bill does not allow county clerks to deny marriage licenses. The bill explicitly allows anyone to refuse to solemnize a marriage, which was already effectively the case. A marriage in Tennessee can be solemnized by a county clerk, or any religious leader, or any legislative member, or any mayor, or the governor, or judges, or former judges, or a notary, or basically anyone that files the right paperwork. This is the "you can't sue a priest for not marrying you in their church" bill, and while the clerks are equally exempt from doing so, this does nothing to allow them to deny licenses to those who have their paperwork signed off on by any of the other thousands of people qualified to do so.
Don't trust Twitter as a news source.
This:
Looks like someone is wrong, again. In Tennessee a marriage has to be solemnized for the marriage license to be valid. The one doing the solemnizing has to sign the certificate. So this law explicitly does allow county clerks to deny an otherwise valid marriage license.
We hear a lot about how Hollywood has gone woke and conservatives are being blacklisted or phased out. Some More News looks at just how true this claim actually is.
Video is 54 minutes.
An hour is an awfully long time to say "No, it isn't"
Did you just stop reading partway? Or if you're just trying to be pedantic, I can play that game too, because by the sort of argument you're making, county clerks could always have denied marriage licenses to anyone who didn't complete the paperwork correctly. That's the sort of denying we're talking about, right?
So your position is that "He called for X, which is the same thing as Y" doesn't mean "He called for Y"?