I had no idea that even happened! Well, Secret Invasion is not canon to me now, and plenty of others!Ret-conning Nick Fury as a pathetic failure is the biggest load of horse-shit in Sam Jackson's entire career.
I had no idea that even happened! Well, Secret Invasion is not canon to me now, and plenty of others!Ret-conning Nick Fury as a pathetic failure is the biggest load of horse-shit in Sam Jackson's entire career.
Him being haunted by the Harvest thing, I could handle. What really assassinated his character was basically saying that the Skrulls were responsible for all of his success as a spy.Let's pretend that Secret Invasion had good special effects and budget management. Ret-conning Nick Fury as a pathetic failure is the biggest load of horse-shit in Sam Jackson's entire career.
We're now getting into the worst part about comics. MCU has been so busy imitating them, they're imitating the bad parts with unnecessary or pointless retcons.Him being haunted by the Harvest thing, I could handle. What really assassinated his character was basically saying that the Skrulls were responsible for all of his success as a spy.
So it wasn't enough to have him be a failure, they had to undermine ALL of his past successes at the same time. Man, the more I think about it, the more Secret Invasion has well-earned its spot on the bottom of my MCU shows list, and may even be at the bottom of all MCU properties that aren't Inhumans.
Why is it that secondary characters are so often more interesting than the main ones? Is it just because they don't have enough screen time to really get grating?
I'd say it's because it's much easier for fans to project their ideas of what they are like onto them rather than the main characters. I recall a number of secondary or tertiary characters who became much more contentious when they were upgraded to primary characters.Why is it that secondary characters are so often more interesting than the main ones? Is it just because they don't have enough screen time to really get grating?
Traditionallly, the public is supposed to identify with the hero, so the hero must be as blank as possible to maximize compatibility and projection. The hero is also supposed to incarnate all virtues, so he's (yeah, "he") devoid of the flaws that tend to, paradoxically, endear us more.Why is it that secondary characters are so often more interesting than the main ones? Is it just because they don't have enough screen time to really get grating?
Because unlike main characters side characters don't have to be as identifiable, and so can be taken into different unidentifiable directions. Example: Christopher Moltisanti from The Sopranos. Because he's not the main character who requires a certain level of likeability, like Tony, he can be presented with more facets that would otherwise repel the viewer should they belong to the protagonist.Why is it that secondary characters are so often more interesting than the main ones? Is it just because they don't have enough screen time to really get grating?
I can't say it any better than anyone else above has. But this is what answered that question when I was wondering the same thing.Why is it that secondary characters are so often more interesting than the main ones? Is it just because they don't have enough screen time to really get grating?
Huh, not seen a Cracked After Hours for a while. Not saying I necessarily agree with them (well, except that Bella Swan was explicity supposed to be like that), but I did like the show back when it was still being made.I can't say it any better than anyone else above has. But this is what answered that question when I was wondering the same thing.
Huh, not seen a Cracked After Hours for a while. Not saying I necessarily agree with them (well, except that Bella Swan was explicity supposed to be like that), but I did like the show back when it was still being made.
Still not a fan of Cracked. I stopped going to their website around 2012.I can't say it any better than anyone else above has. But this is what answered that question when I was wondering the same thing.
There has been good filler, but as we've seen what was standard at the time, most "filler" either wasn't good, never referenced again/didn't factor to the overall story (not usually a bad thing), or might as well been non-canon. That was major problem back then for a lot of anime adaptions of manga back then, and not just the shounen. Though shounen such as Naruto and Bleach took it to a worse degree than the original airing of Dragonball Z. It's why you rarely see filler anymore of adaptions, unless it was already made for TV, OVA, or web first.I'm sure the manga purists would get their panties in a bunch, but if you have the chance to make "filler" that is actually good, then why not?
Speaking of filler, I think the Doma/Waking The Dragons Arc of the Yu-Gi-Oh anime is one of the best. The main villain leaves a bit to be desired but the expansion of Mai's arc and the dynamic Yugi, Jonouchi and Kaiba have with their respective evil counterparts is well done.There has been good filler, but as we've seen what was standard at the time, most "filler" either wasn't good, never referenced again/didn't factor to the overall story (not usually a bad thing), or might as well been non-canon. That was major problem back then for a lot of anime adaptions of manga back then, and not just the shounen. Though shounen such as Naruto and Bleach took it to a worse degree than the original airing of Dragonball Z. It's why you rarely see filler anymore of adaptions, unless it was already made for TV, OVA, or web first.