Well, you'd once again be wrong.Oh no, I'm suggesting you saw a headline now that told you things that have previously happened and are pretending to remember them to make them sound more impactful.
Well, you'd once again be wrong.Oh no, I'm suggesting you saw a headline now that told you things that have previously happened and are pretending to remember them to make them sound more impactful.
This is the most nakedly desperate attempt at a gotcha I've seen from you.Oh no, I'm suggesting you saw a headline now that told you things that have previously happened and are pretending to remember them to make them sound more impactful.
How is that desperate? It took no effort, no commitment, and 6 seconds to type.This is the most nakedly desperate attempt at a gotcha I've seen from you.
My sympathies to his victim.Aaron Craig Gleason, an anti-LGBTQ+ writer who has accused queer people of "grooming" children for sexual abuse, has been arrested and charged for molesting a child under the age of 12.
Gleason, a 39-year-old middle school teacher and soccer coach who has written for the anti-LGBTQ+ media outlets The Daily Wire, The Federalist, and The Imaginative Conservative, was arrested on January 28 by police officers in Okaloosa, Florida. He has been charged with the "lewd and lascivious molestation of a child under the age of 12 by a person over the age of 18" and was held in jail on a $75,000 bond.
The Daily Wire has already removed Gleason's author page from its website, but the Internet Archive has preserved the page. It reveals that he wrote two articles around 2022 about current Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The Daily Wire and its numerous contributors have long claimed that LGBTQ+ people and their allies are "indoctrinating" and "sexualizing" children through public school education and media.
I mean, lots of Christian churches have been burned, a bunch of mass shootings have been at Christian churches, you post here... tons of crimes aimed at Christians.Yeah, after I see all those news reports of churches burning, Christians being dragged out onto the streets and beaten, and... wait, no, none of that is happening. What this actually is, is an attempt to force Christianity onto all Americans through force of law.
https://www.pajiba.com/news/precise...rview-is-the-president-freaking-out-about.phpEdited: “We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end.”
Original: “Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by, or a result of, many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region. And we’re not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end.”
That’s it. That’s the controversial edit. 60 Minutes removed some filler — a meaningless sentence that did not change the substance of what aired whatsoever. They edited out a meandering preface: “Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by, or a result of, many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region.”
And yet, the President — even today, even knowing exactly what was edited — has continued to call for CBS to lose its license, condemning the removal of that one sentence as the “biggest broadcasting SCANDAL in history.”
“CBS and 60 Minutes defrauded the public by doing something which has never, to this extent, been seen before. They 100% removed Kamala’s horrible, election-changing answers to questions and replaced them with completely different, and far better, answers taken from another part of the interview,” he wrote on Truth Social.
I think it's no coincidence that you keep mentioning a dollar figure but not a material impact.Or (and stick with me on this): we end this without ending 40billion in poverty relief. Crazy idea, I know.
He doesn't really care about the edit.Precisely What Edit in the '60 Minutes' Interview Is the President Freaking Out About?
If they're going to write an article like that and get the details wrong, it'd be better not to write it at all. They didn't just remove some filler. They aired it in two different ways, once in the ads for the interview and a second time when they aired the interview, and one had only the first half where the other had only the second half, creating the illusion that the same question was answered in two totally different ways.Precisely What Edit in the '60 Minutes' Interview Is the President Freaking Out About?
That’s it. That’s the controversial edit. 60 Minutes removed some filler — a meaningless sentence that did not change the substance of what aired whatsoever. They edited out a meandering preface: “Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by, or a result of, many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region.”
That's probably what, at most a dozen incidents nationwide in a year aside from the occasional bored schoolkids tearing something up? Seems like a waste of resources, thought we were supposed to be all about efficiency now?"fully prosecute anti-Christian violence and vandalism in our society"
*ugh* no. Maybe it's needed for your prosperity gospel ass to not hate yourself, and maybe it helps you keep support from the religious right, but fuck off."can't be happy without religion, without that belief".
It's not coincidence-- it's because the USAID website, including its progress reports, have become inaccessie since about Monday.I think it's no coincidence that you keep mentioning a dollar figure but not a material impact.