Funny events in anti-woke world

[Phoenixmgs]

Because of a collective defensive capacity. Russia is more powerful militarily than any individually. Hence the need to foster and maintain that collective capability.

I very much doubt Russia could take any major European country one on one. If Russia actually can with that joke of an army, then it's on these countries for not putting anything into military/defense.

 

[Trunkage]

Seriously, what is wrong with you people? How is it on the Secretary of Health and Human Services to make sure everyone is vaccinated against measles?

It's their job
What is wrong with you.

Vaccines aren't forced on people, so obviously there will be some that don't get vaccinated. Where were your complaints against previous people that had the job that weren't someone you had extreme bias against?

Other health secretaries didn't delete thousands of studies about the very low dangers of vaccines just because he didn't like the results

RFK can't name a single vaccine that he thinks is safe enough to use. He's ignored millions of studies over centruies because he doesn't like it. He's doing the opposite of helping.

Other secretaries promoted ones that were safe enough to use. So they were helping

It's that easy.

 

[Burnhardt]

Seriously, what is wrong with you people? How is it on the Secretary of Health and Human Services to make sure everyone is vaccinated against measles? Vaccines aren't forced on people so obviously there will be some that don't get vaccinated. Where were your complaints against previous people that had the job that weren't someone you had extreme bias against?

Someone has died of measles, a disease that is easily preventable through vaccination.
By not spreading lies/bullshit about vaccines that have been used for decades and which have been proven safe through multiple studies.
Vaccines should be mandatory, with the only exceptions being for medical reasons. We didn't wipe smallpox by being polite about it.
They were not vaccine sceptics.

 

[Thaluikhain]

Because of a collective defensive capacity. Russia is more powerful militarily than any individually. Hence the need to foster and maintain that collective capability.

I would say that isn't the reason Russia can't take over the UK or France, those two have nuclear weapons. So, now that the big nuclear armed ally doesn't want to be an ally, as long as every minor nation in Europe has a nuclear arsenal, I'm sure everything will turn out just fine...

 

[Dirty Hipsters]

I would say that isn't the reason Russia can't take over the UK or France, those two have nuclear weapons. So, now that the big nuclear armed ally doesn't want to be an ally, as long as every minor nation in Europe has a nuclear arsenal, I'm sure everything will turn out just fine...

Ukraine had nuclear weapons (the third largest arsenal in the world, and the knowledge and facilities to build more) and gave them up in exchange for a guarantee from Russia that they would not be attacked, and a security assurance from the US and UK that they would give them aid if they were to be attacked by Russia.

https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/ukraine-nuclear-weapons-and-security-assurances-glance

The world is watching and seeing how well giving up nuclear arms works out. I doubt any country will ever do it again.

 

[Thaluikhain]

Ukraine had nuclear weapons (the third largest arsenal in the world, and the knowledge and facilities to build more) and gave them up in exchange for a guarantee from Russia that they would not be attacked, and a security assurance from the US and UK that they would give them aid if they were to be attacked by Russia.

https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/ukraine-nuclear-weapons-and-security-assurances-glance

The world is watching and seeing how well giving up nuclear arms works out. I doubt any country will ever do it again.

Indeed. One also suspects that if Iraq had WMDs they could deploy in 45 minutes, the country would not have been invaded.

 

[Phoenixmgs]

It's their job
What is wrong with you.


Other health secretaries didn't delete thousands of studies about the very low dangers of vaccines just because he didn't like the results

RFK can't name a single vaccine that he thinks is safe enough to use. He's ignored millions of studies over centruies because he doesn't like it. He's doing the opposite of helping.

Other secretaries promoted ones that were safe enough to use. So they were helping

It's that easy.

It's literally not his job... You have basically the same amount of measles cases every year. Can't find a single article about RFK Jr deleting studies so I'm gonna assume that's a lie. Also, vaccines aren't some thing that people are on the fence about and the US isn't gonna change their stance on vaccines. Focus on what RFK Jr can actually alter instead of some bullshit that's not gonna happen. The US government has been doing tons of messaging that has made people significantly unhealthier and if RFK Jr can do anything to change that, then that's a good thing.

Someone has died of measles, a disease that is easily preventable through vaccination.
By not spreading lies/bullshit about vaccines that have been used for decades and which have been proven safe through multiple studies.
Vaccines should be , with the only exceptions being for medical reasons. We didn't wipe smallpox by being polite about it.
They were not vaccine sceptics.

I very much doubt the communities that don't get vaccinated are those that believe vaccine lies like they cause autism or whatever.

 

[Thaluikhain]

I very much doubt the communities that don't get vaccinated are those that believe vaccine lies like they cause autism or whatever.

Right, people who believe that vaccines are dangerous and the people who don't get vaccinated are different people, because...mumble mumble mumble

 

[Phoenixmgs]

Right, people who believe that vaccines are dangerous and the people who don't get vaccinated are different people, because...mumble mumble mumble

Yeah, totally looks like these people are followers of RFK Jr and/or read vaccine studies

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/27/health/mennonite-texas-measles/index.html

 

[Agema]

The world is watching and seeing how well giving up nuclear arms works out. I doubt any country will ever do it again.

Not just that countries will stop giving up their nukes, but that countries without them must increasingly be viewing them as a defence requirement. I'd be surprised if anyone ever gets Iran back to a negotiating table regarding nuclear development, for instance.

 

[Silvanus]

I very much doubt Russia could take any major European country one on one. If Russia actually can with that joke of an army, then it's on these countries for not putting anything into military/defense.

Then you don't understand the relative military power at play here. Russia has feasibly the second or third most powerful military in the world. That ain't a joke.

Once again: their success in Ukraine has been so limited because of collective action.

 

[Thaluikhain]

Once again: their success in Ukraine has been so limited because of collective action.

And a bad initial start, taking their opponents somewhat by surprise perhaps, but taking their own military by surprise.