Funny events in anti-woke world
- Thread starter Agema
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I did not say "You have just decided that you give much, much less of a shit if it happens to non-citizens, even though they're supposed to be just as free from arbitrary detention." I said going after people who are political opponents on purpose is worse than an administrative error.
Why'd you even bring it up? It's a nothing story. It just shows your bias. Like when you brought up seed oils being healthier than butter only because your side claimed it with a bullshit study.
What's the other story then? I only recall the Khalil story being of a legal resident.
Because he said "proudly" in there? Really, this is what you concern your life with because someone you don't like added one minor word to something? Where's an example of you being mad at Biden for adding a single word that wasn't the best choice?
But why are the democrats better? I don't say that you should vote for republicans. I don't call people bad names like racist or dumb or sexist for voting for democrats, do I?
Last edited:
him having daryl cooper on was about the most despicable thing anyone could do: another soft talking hitler apologist who actually claims the holocaust only happened cos there weren't enough foods and it would've been crueler to "let all those poor prisoners die slowly" - yes no exaggeration, a mercy genocide
Last edited:
Because their accusations typically have more weight behind them and they aren't backing a guy who tried to carry out a violent coup based on lies about a stolen election and who is now trying to erase the accomplishments and milestones of anyone who isn't a straight white male under the guise of removing "divisive ideology".
...your brain is heavily damaged. see your doctor plz
To backing up its claims with evidence? To wanting to live in a world where the powerful are held to standards and ethics and the powerless aren't victimised or scapegoated? Oh no, how terrible.
You believe all those arbitrary detentions of protesters etc were administrative errors? Just conveniently of people who were critical of the government? No, buddy.
At this point, you've talked about it a hell of a lot more than I have. I've long since moved onto talking about much more egregious examples.
At the bottom left of each forum page, you'll find a set of buttons allowing you to view the previous pages. That way, if you cannot remember something we've already covered, you can speedily catch up to remind yourself. Pro tip.
...And promised more to come. He's very, very obviously portraying it as a good thing that this innocent legal resident was arrested. The government is weaponising law enforcement to repress speech, and you couldn't care less.
But republicans didn't remove candidates from ballots...
Last thing you said doesn't exist...
They can't even do a video fairly on something that isn't political let alone one that is.
What protesters? I'm talking about the immigration ones.
You brought it up all this stuff only because it's left leaning, you don't do the same for the other side.
And you can use that to link me to these other stories.
You're assuming he knew that he was a legal resident, and he wasn't innocent either.
We laugh and we laugh at the complete clowns in the US and we are right to do so. But its worth pointing out that the US circus doesn't have a monopoly on clowns.
Case in point our own migration minister Faber. Best known for doing a Palpatine impression and going ''I AM policy!''. Throughout her tenure she's been incompetent, tactless, combative and hasn't even managed to pass a single bill. As such she's constantly in conflict with parliament and even her own coalition members.
This came to a head when it turned out Faber abused her power to deprive volunteers of a royal award for their service and the accompanying ceremonial ribbon. She did this just because those volunteers got the award for helping refugees and she didn't like that. That's already more than a bit pathetic, but when hauled for parliament over this she made things much worse by endlessly repeating the two stock phrases ''I want less migration'', and more bizarrely ''I'm not a stamp machine!''. She answered those lines to every single question thrown at her for several hours. This created such anger in parliament she got hauled back to parliament yet another time to answer for her antics of the aforementioned session, and whether or not the coalition is functioning. She didn't manage to make a good impression there either.
Case in point our own migration minister Faber. Best known for doing a Palpatine impression and going ''I AM policy!''. Throughout her tenure she's been incompetent, tactless, combative and hasn't even managed to pass a single bill. As such she's constantly in conflict with parliament and even her own coalition members.
This came to a head when it turned out Faber abused her power to deprive volunteers of a royal award for their service and the accompanying ceremonial ribbon. She did this just because those volunteers got the award for helping refugees and she didn't like that. That's already more than a bit pathetic, but when hauled for parliament over this she made things much worse by endlessly repeating the two stock phrases ''I want less migration'', and more bizarrely ''I'm not a stamp machine!''. She answered those lines to every single question thrown at her for several hours. This created such anger in parliament she got hauled back to parliament yet another time to answer for her antics of the aforementioned session, and whether or not the coalition is functioning. She didn't manage to make a good impression there either.
Economy Most Important Issue to 2024 Presidential Vote
U.S. voters rate the economy as the most important issue to their presidential vote, with democracy, potential Supreme Court picks and terrorism/national security also ranking highly.
news.gallup.com
Yeah, they just try to limit the number of people who can vote instead and lie about election fraud that Trump-appointed judges disagree happened.
You really don't pay attention to the news, do you?
Just reposting these finely-aged quotes from November.
Last time around, he had limited authority to build a wall, fought with Congress for a bit, and eventually declared it a national emergency to get around that fight.Just reposting these finely-aged quotes from November.
This time, he'd need Congress to play ball to actually enact the policy, so he declared a national emergency to skip that fight.
My prediction was almost perfect: I thought he'd say foreign trade was a source of undue influence on the US as justification, and instead he went with trade imbalances make our defense industry reliant on foreign adversaries. Either way, I explicitly called that he was going to need to make a justification like that.
It was so fucking petty. Nobody even really cares much about these ribbons - they're the most uncontroversial baseline acknowledgements from the government. And STILL she refused to sign for them. Not because she didn't care, not because she had better things to do, but just because she hates immigrants so much that even the smallest gestures of kindness toward them are seen as opposition to her. And ofcourse Wilders aggressively came to her defense and applauded her actions.
This whole thing is probably what she'll be remembered for most, because she's unable to do anything actually productive. This is Wilders' protege, by the way.
Both sides try to change voting laws that would help them win along with gerrymandering as well.
That article didn't mention any single thing that was censored. It's like the one person that posted that they removed some Jackie Robinson article from somewhere and all they did was remove a meta-tag on that article.
I haven't noticed any higher prices on tech products.Just reposting these finely-aged quotes from November.
Have you noticed the announcement of blanket tariffs? The ones you said wouldn't be happening? You asked me to tell you when it happened, and here I am telling you that it's happened.
Ah I see. I'd interpreted the like about this being like "build a wall" to mean it's bluster and won't get done.
How do you feel about the President sidestepping Congress's supposed economic powers like this?