Well, no, it's not. Tofu is the curd of soy milk. This is a protein cultured from animal cells.It's literally just tofu.
Well, no, it's not. Tofu is the curd of soy milk. This is a protein cultured from animal cells.It's literally just tofu.
Because I included ALL hospitalized patients into that number when it was only those with severe covid that were in your study and then ~2% of them got arrhythmia. It literally can't not be an overestimate.I'd be fascinated to find out how on earth you've come to this conclusion.
How exactly does "understanding maths" prove that 0.3% cannot be an underestimate? Considering there will be cases that weren't hospitalised, or weren't confirmed; and considering you calculated it as a percentage of the entire population, whether or not they even had covid during the observation period-- both aspects that could easily lead to underestimation.
You didn't limit your claim to merely what people "need". That's a subjective value judgement. Even if immunity wanes, a person could reasonably conclude that boosters aren't necessary, based on low risk.
Whereas you indicated that immunity simply doesn't wane for certain groups. There's zero basis for that. Paul Offit never said anything of the kind. The study directly contradicts it.
Do you not realise that if you're overestimating the sample size, it'll result in an underestimate of the prevalence?Because I included ALL hospitalized patients into that number when it was only those with severe covid that were in your study and then ~2% of them got arrhythmia. It literally can't not be an overestimate.
Protection from severe disease relies on B- and T-Cells. They do not last forever for Covid.Immunity to severe disease doesn't wane for normal people. Like I said, it could maybe in 10 years or 20 years or something like that, but not now.
My bad, I assumed it was like beyond meat.Well, no, it's not. Tofu is the curd of soy milk. This is a protein cultured from animal cells.
I didn't overestimate the sample size...Do you not realise that if you're overestimating the sample size, it'll result in an underestimate of the prevalence?
Protection from severe disease relies on B- and T-Cells. They do not last forever for Covid.
You just said you included all hospitalised patients, and that it "can't not be an overestimate".I didn't overestimate the sample size...
Unless you read it.The study literally validates what I said...
Wonder how the alt-right. "true gamers" are gonna spin this? Hope it was worth it, you fuck heads.fckin called.it at the start: just another front for christian anti-abortion anti-sex anti-lgbt reactionary lobbying network! where do I exchange these psychic points for real money?
They have the "Trump is fighting this" argument. He is writing executive orders and pushing for legislation to restrict payment providers from excluding legal business they don't like.Wonder how the alt-right. "true gamers" are gonna spin this? Hope it was worth it, you fuck heads.
And how long before the dumb, cowardly, punk-ass bitches realize that Trump isn't fighting gets through their racist and sexist skulls? If these fools or their echo chambers can't recognize the shit they're being shoveled in their mouths, then I am not thanking them. Especially when the people who truly care about real aspects of free speech are the ones fighting back and not sucking the dick of a biacth-in-a-boxstand and his fucking biatch-ass goons. If this is a future those grifters wanted, then they deserve it. Gonna b verye hard to get that porn game or any game with fan-service since you put the biatch in charge. The grifters love being fucked by their master, because they have no balls nor ovaries.They have the "Trump is fighting this" argument. He is writing executive orders and pushing for legislation to restrict payment providers from excluding legal business they don't like.
I mean, the federal government started it years back with stuff like Operation Chokepoint. The earliest example I can find of US gov doing it involved niche pornography back in 2007, though I'd be surprised if that was the actual first time.He is writing executive orders and pushing for legislation to restrict payment providers from excluding legal business they don't like.
Nevermind that Trump certainly does not care about the gamer thing and only does it to protect Crypto.
You do realize 2% of hospitalized patients is more people than 2% of the group that had severe covid, right? If 1,000 people out of a million get something, that's a higher rate than if 100 people out of 1,000 got that.You just said you included all hospitalised patients, and that it "can't not be an overestimate".
Unless you read it.
Target has the best brand of pants, Goodfellow, easily. They are the only jeans out of places like JCPenney and Kohls that have soft and comfortable jeans.Fuck target. Hope it was worth screwing over customers and dropping diversity. There is almost no reason to shop their anymore, aside from certain allergy medicines for me at least.
1000 out of a million is 0.1%.You do realize 2% of hospitalized patients is more people than 2% of the group that had severe covid, right? If 1,000 people out of a million get something, that's a higher rate than if 100 people out of 1,000 got that.
6 months.Uhh... Remember when you guys were concerned that antibodies were going away and I said that didn't matter (because, you know, that's what experts said)?
Substantial immune memory is generated after COVID-19, involving all four major types of immune memory. About 95% of subjects retained immune memory at ~6 months after infection. Circulating antibody titers were not predictive of T cell memory. Thus, simple serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies do not reflect the richness and durability of immune memory to SARS-CoV-2.
I worded that wrong. I'm using the same sample size...1000 out of a million is 0.1%.
100 out of a thousand is 10%.
10% is a higher prevalence than 0.1%.
I'm sorry, but I don't think you actually grasp how rates and prevalence work. It is not just "bigger number = higher prevalence". The same number, of a larger sample size, would represent a lower prevalence. This is how an overestimate of the sample size leads to an underestimate of prevalence.
6 months.
Please show me anything that indicates covid-triggered T- and B-Cells do not wane at all, years later.