I don't know what this is in response to. It doesn't seem to relate to anything said in the post before.
Not going to last. To
last. That is not the same as saying it doesn't
exist.
Oh, I love it when you do this-- accidentally present a source that substantiates what
I'm saying!
So, as your own quote shows, the "infectious dose" varies hugely by pathogen. And if we read on a bit, we see that the "infectious dose" is on the low side for both Covid-19 and "common cold" coronaviruses:
"These studies suggest that one reason the virus is so easily transmissible is because it has a relatively low infectious dose,
similar to other respiratory viruses such as RSV and “common cold” coronaviruses (and lower than the infectious dose of most strains of influenza virus)."
"it’s theoretically possible to get a dose large enough to start an infection in
just a minute of close contact".
And it links to the pubmed article that shows the estimated infectious dose for "common cold" coronaviruses and rhinoviruses is very, very low-- from 0.032 TCID-50 to 13 TCID-50. For context, that's
easily low enough to be carried in a few coughs or breaths.
No: all this proves is that a vaccination effort won't render outbreaks impossible. Which is bloody obvious and isn't what we're discussing.
Not what you argued.