youtube.com
Not to mention, anyone who doesn't have all their documentation on them at all times is automatically fair game.
Hey, a woman got shot for being in her car menacingly, and another person got shot for going after an ICE agent with a shovel (self defense, fair enough), and at least the former was labeled a terrorist to justify the action. He's just covering his own ass so ICE doesn't "accidentally" shoot him while protecting him from the illegal immigrants that are flooding and destroying California.
Hmm. Apparently Newsom is origami paper
There is arguably a subtle distinction here that whilst certain arms of the state (such as the police) can be used by the authorities for intimidation and violence, not all the officers of those agencies necessarily believe the state is doing so, support it, or personally carry out acts of violence and intimidation.
Sure, that's absolutely true, and in the hypothetical situation that they should get called upon to explain themselves, well, they just did their job. No arguing with that.
Of course. They've only got several months to normalize and spread the idea if they want to effectively use ICE for voter suppression. If they go there, they won't announce the plan to use ICE to "secure elections" from "illegals voting" until after Labor Day. They can't wait until the very last second for logistical reasons (and anything at that scale would leak), but they have to ensure there's not too long to plan on how to deal with it.
www.foxnews.com
All he has to do is make a donation to Trump, and RFK Jr. will declare steroids to be one of the four major food groups.Didn't he take so much PEDs his heart almost exploded?PAUL ‘TRIPLE H’ LEVESQUE: I went from 130 pounds to a world champ. We all must get fit
WWE star shares how gym transformed his life at 14, now part of Trump's Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition to combat America's growing health crisis.
The leading democratic presidential candidate, everyone. No spine.
Hmm. Apparently Newsom is origami paper
So when you said "no protection", that's not actually what you meant. Fine, whatever. So long as you're acknowledging that it does convey protection.
Yes, it transmits via airborne droplets, like covid.
More irrelevant waffle. Lots of people did silly things early in the pandemic, when anxiety was high and the nature of the virus (i.e., that there's no significant fomite transmission) was largely unknown. Nobody here is saying it's necessary to wipe down vegetables.
You argued against lockdowns on the grounds that they shut some nutritional and immunisation programmes in a handful of Asian countries. To which, that article line is totally irrelevant, and the argument itself falls apart as soon as you look at the countless countries that locked down without ending such programmes.
You wrote this... straight after you wrote this
Utterly fascinating.
Unlikely Phoenix thinks that, the argument is not about lockdowns being worse than COVID, only that lockdowns could cause more damage than they mitigate. Those are only equivalent arguments if you think lockdowns prevent nearly all deaths from viruses, which you are the aberration for thinking.
www.wosu.org
Phoenix did in fact argue that "the vax is more dangerous to certain groups than actually getting covid".
Most of the time, that's the case. Though here he posted a "cost-benefit analysis" that argued the harm of lockdown in Canada outweighed not only the harm it mitigated, but also the entirety of the harm of covid to that country, and even the harm it would have done if there had been no lockdown.
One wonders how much they formerly did believe in free speech, or how much they thought they'd lose if they didn't pretend they did.No one with lots of power believes in free speech anymore. Got it.
Federal judge rules Ohio State University likely violated pro-Palestinian student's free speech
Second year student Guy Christensen and the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio sued Ohio State last year, alleging the university violated his 1st and 14th amendment rights.
What Phoenixmgs is talking about is, if taken as he says it, would possibly lead to a few thousand deaths in the US. What I'm talking about led to hundreds of thousands of deaths. I'm willing to say it could only be 600, 000 or 700, 000 unnecessary deaths. If you do the math, it could be as high as 1, 000, 000. I was already discounting hundreds of thousands of deaths because I was already thinking about how not all of them would be preventable
