This is what you don't get, Obama, Clinton, and Biden are all similar, and share a similar economic, and social ideology. Aka Neoliberalism. When I attack Biden I am attacking his economy and his social policy, and his ideology from where he bases his ideas, and his actions.
No I understand that perfectly. We're totally screwed for the foreseeable future. I'm just not going to waste my energy on having a tantrum over it.
While I recognize Obama is better than Trump, saying he was a good president is a stretch.
No, your right there is not a 100% certainly Biden will do X. But if Biden says its, picks people who believe in it, and advocates for it, I can say with a margin of error that it's higher than if Biden doesn't say it, doesn't pick people who will believe in it as his advisors, and doesn't advocate for it like the public option, deficit spending, and end of fossil fuel subsidies, and clean energy subsidies.
And yet he still did those things I mentioned. And nowhere did I mention he was a good president.
I said them before. Several times. Organize with others in your community, talk to your friends and family more, avoid becoming isolated or allowing that to happen to them. Pay attention to events rather than campaign promises. Read some theory or history. Prepare yourself mentally for things to get worse. Learn to fire a gun if you feel safe with one. Buy your prescriptions in bulk if you can. Renew your passport. Love and connect with other human beings rather than focusing on empty cultural battles that will feel incredibly irrelevant in ten years outside. There’s mountains of more valuable actions that can be taken.
Do you or do you not understand why you shouldn't ask someone to prove a negative? Any answer to this very easy question that is not an unqualified yes is automatically a no.
I'm already doing that most of that stuff and it's not mutually exclusive with some of the other proposals. As long as it works, do it.
A negative claim is a colloquialism for an affirmative claim that asserts the non-existence or exclusion of something.[9] Claiming that it is impossible to prove a negative is a pseudologic, because there are many proofs that substantiate negative claims in mathematics, science, and economics, including Arrow's impossibility theorem. There can be multiple claims within a debate. Nevertheless, whoever makes a claim carries the burden of proof regardless of positive or negative content in the claim.
Better to not know the finer points arguing/philosophy then to be a mindless Biden supporter.
Eh, don't bother. At this point, anyone who thinks not voting is going to accomplish anything meaningful is just trying to justify a tantrum.
One it's 1 hour 45 minutes long
Yeah and most people already fucking vote so maybe advocate for something that’ll actually make a difference rather than perpetuating this circle jerk.
