Is it better or worse than industrial Petroleum or Chloroform?
Cause I've not had bear mace but I've had them, and those probably count as my worst ones to date.
Again for the people a the back.
KYLE'S GUN WAS NOT HIS OWN HE WAS GIVEN IT BY THE CAR LOT OWNER
No they're pointing out people have a right to defend their properties etc it seems and supporting the idea of people having a means of self defence.
Which isn't out of the normal for them
Also again based on evidence so far people lunged at him before he shot and reports suggest there had already been some minor violence at the lot before the shooting.
Yeh you do probably have more of a spine than me not having had a big fucking needle jammed up there before lol.
Oh and do get pissed because I called out your little play and countered it.
If you had said the actual people being maced not this other dude who jumped in had shot him you may have had a case. As is not so much.
Let's see how many times does someone have to tell you that the guy who gave Kyle the gun should be charged before it sinks in? Oh hey, did you see where everyone said that the guy who gave the KID, you know that underage MINOR a gun should be charged? Oh year that means that they were given a gun right? Yea that means the guy, ya that "owner" guy? Ya you know him? He should be CHARGED for giving a child who was not his own kid a gun..
As for Kyle, he shouldn't have taken the gun, he shouldn't have put himself in the middle of a bunch of people pissed off about people being shot with guns while holding the gun. He then again should not have shot people who were pissed off about people being shot with guns. so there is that too.
( I have no idea why you wrote something in big text that was already made abundantly clear that we though that owner guy who gave a kid a gun should have been charged for doing so. That doesn't really help kyle though. Kyles parents though should sue the hell out of the owner guy though for giving their child a gun. It is sort of like this.
If an underage kid isn't old enough to buy liquor themselves, but then say some other guy who is not their parent decides to give them a bottle of liquor anyhow. Well if the cops roll up they will charge the kid for having the liquor AND they charge the adult who was not their parents for giving it to them too. Yea it is like that, except this is wayy worse and now people are dead due to it.
People get charged for giving kids things they are too young to buy, you would think in the case of them doing so and people wind up dead because of it, that it would be seen as much worse right?