So Uzaki is fine, then, yes?Yes they did. It's wrong to be sexually attracted to people who look like children. There. It's actually quite simple.
And adults with certain conditions should be doomed to a life of celibacy, yes?
So Uzaki is fine, then, yes?Yes they did. It's wrong to be sexually attracted to people who look like children. There. It's actually quite simple.
The problem arises when people try to stretch this very reasonable opinion to include things like merely being immature mentally, or short and flat, or when they apply this to drawings of fictional characters and so on.Yes they did. It's wrong to be sexually attracted to people who look like children. There. It's actually quite simple.
If she's an adult, and looks like an adult, then jerk it to your hearts content.So Uzaki is fine, then, yes?
yupAnd adults with certain conditions should be doomed to a life of celibacy, yes?
She's 19 yep, though people here were saying she is also no good. It'd be helpful to see this opinion presented when people call others creepy for liking her, and not only when you wanna complain about lolis.If she's an adult, and looks like an adult, then jerk it to your hearts content.
Well then you and @lil devils x need to hash things out.If she's an adult, and looks like an adult, then jerk it to your hearts content.
Why? I don't necessarily think you should jerk it to adult anime girls, I just don't care enough to argue the point. But that's wildly different from arguing with you about whether it's ethical to be attracted to people who look like they are 8 years old. Especially when the examples you gave were from the real world. By the way, the answer is "no, it's not."Well then you and @lil devils x need to hash things out.
And you have something in common with Hitler regarding the eugenics thing.
Because, as Dreiko says, there are people who say "no, it's the mind that matters, not the body!" and there are people who say "No, the body is what matters, not the mind. You are the latter. Lil devils is the former.Why?
I think you mean "equating" not "acquitting". And yes, it is eugenics. You think that certain people should not be allowed to breed.Also, lol at you acquitting eugenics with me saying that it's wrong to be sexually attracted to children.
Then take it up with her.Because, as Dreiko says, there are people who say "no, it's the mind that matters, not the body!" and there are people who say "No, the body is what matters, not the mind. You are the latter. Lil devils is the former.
No, I don't think you should be attracted to people who look like children. If those people can adopt, or be artificially inseminated, and safely have kids, then they can do so.I think you mean "equating" not "acquitting". And yes, it is eugenics. You think that certain people should not be allowed to breed.
Nah, Housey. It's just certain people should not be allowed to breed with you.I think you mean "equating" not "acquitting". And yes, it is eugenics. You think that certain people should not be allowed to breed.
"You can never know sex because of this aesthetic condition you have. You just aren't fully human, sorry"No, I don't think you should be attracted to people who look like children. If those people can adopt, or be artificially inseminated, and safely have kids, then they can do so.
You really are defensive about the right to be sexually attracted to people who have underage bodies. I don't have issues with people who have certain conditions. I have an issue with people who are sexually attracted to minors. You're the one who always seemed to think that the whole age of consent thing was bullshit anyway."You can never know sex because of this aesthetic condition you have. You just aren't fully human, sorry"
Sounds like hate speech.
You really are adamant that certain adults with certain disorders, outside of their control, should never know the touch of a lover, just because of how they look.You really are defensive about the right to be sexually attracted to people who have underage bodies. I don't have issues with people who have certain conditions. I have an issue with people who are sexually attracted to minors. You're the one who always seemed to think that the whole age of consent thing was bullshit anyway.
nah, the person with the disorder can do whatever they want. they're blameless. what i'm saying is, if you're sexually attracted to underage bodies, you're a fucking awful person. the lowest.You really are adamant that certain adults with certain disorders, outside of their control, should never know the touch of a lover, just because of how they look.
Look at yourself. Look at how far you're willing to go to 'stick it to the weebs'. You're saying that two consenting adults can never be together, based on body type.
nah, the person with the disorder can do whatever they want. they're blameless. what i'm saying is, if you're sexually attracted to underage bodies, you're a fucking awful person. the lowest.
So of course I believe they should find love, obviously, but thinking it's only skin deep is an extremely shallow way of going about it.
[/QUOTE]What I said, because you can't make your own arguments work
More like my enemies are fighting amongst themselves now, all I have to do is sit back and watch.Why do you keep trying to throw mumbler and lil devil quotes at me? Are you so bad at debate that you're having to turn to your enemies for arguments?
But that was never an issue. The detractors said "this child was made to look attractive"If the only reason you are attracted to someone (adult, cartoon, fuck if I care) is because they look like a child