Also known as the "Mar-a-La-La-La-go" gambit.
Election results discussion thread (and sadly the inevitable aftermath)
- Thread starter Godzillarich(aka tf2godz)
- Start date
- Status
It not being an "official hearing" doesn't mean that everything (or anything) said there was a lie, which was my point. You're willing to call people liars or actors because you don't like what is being said, which makes you just as bad as those whom you oppose.
No it means I have critical thinking skills. Two sides of a debate don't have two equally compelling arguments. Trump and his team are liars, are frauds, and their "evidence" when presented to Judges who will jail them if they lie is withdrawn. You don't get to put your fantasy world on the same shelf as reality just because you feel bad, or think reality is bias against you. That's a personal problem Mr. La-La-La, and reality doesn't have to indulge you.
Where's the other side?
When Trump's team alleges that the ballots haven't been properly observed and that the signatures were never verified by both a democrat and a republican, who is saying otherwise?
Reality is Mr La-La-La. They're lying.
Oh and the Governor and Attorney General of Pennsylvania both said everything said in the ballroom was false.
Where's his evidence?
Trumps team has affidavits. Is it just his word vs 50 others?
"Somebody in a position of authority said something I disagree with, so that's what I believe! I pity those who just believe whatever Trump says"
Last edited:
No that's not how law works. The Governor doesn't have to provide evidence a crime didn't happen, the Trump cultists need to provide evidence it did. And every single time they've been asked to show evidence in court, they've withdrawn because it was falsified evidence.
Like I said earlier Mr. La-La-La, reality doesn't have to indulge you.
Are you talking about the ONE amended PA complaint?
And no, just because they're withdrawn an argument, it doesn't mean that it was "falsified". That's just your assumption of malice.
Last edited:
Sidney Powell's lawsuit:
and another in Michigan:
Look at all these affidavits, or in your words, liars, who are lying under oath and under penalty of perjury.
and another in Michigan:
Look at all these affidavits, or in your words, liars, who are lying under oath and under penalty of perjury.
Last edited:
Is that THE Sidney Powell? The one who was explicitly cut off from Trump's legal team because she said Chavez used German computers to switch Trump's votes? Oh man, she might be on to something with that one.
Is that the guy who can't wrap his head around mail in ballots, or the guy who hates how homeless people get to vote?
He's the guy who doesn't want people to get disenfranchised due to fraud. You don't want that either, right?
I didn't see you post anyone like that, only people trying to disenfranchise others.
Ah, that explains why you don't see any evidence of fraud then. Maybe see an optometrist
Well it's easy to miss the evidence of fraud since everyone who's alleged fraud is consistently wrong about their analysis.
I don't know about that. I read Clarence is about to hear Trump ally's lawsuit about irregularities in GA...
I don't know why you get your knickers in a twist, this is wholesome entertainment. Trump is even trying to bring back firing squads for capital federal offenses - what a romp! I wonder who he thinks he will shoot. He probably thinks he's Cheyney
- Status