Recent content by Eric the Orange

As far as I can tell their seems to be two definitions for asexual (as it applies to human beings). 1 Not being attracted to anyone. This follows the logic of if heterosexual is attracted to not like, homosexual is attracted to like, pansexual is attracted to all, than asexual is attracted...

I mean "A lot of" is like 2 here.

If that is so how do you explain the existence of atypical gender identifications like non-binary. The ideas of such things is a relatively new one and as such their isn't really any norms to conform to.

OK what does it mean to belong to a certain gender? To me it sounds like you are signaling "this is what I am comfortable with. This is what I prefer.". but that feels like it turns around and runs into the same question. Why do you prefer that way? What is it about your chosen gender...

OK, we can change it to that. But that doesn't really answer my question. what are the differences between gender and gender norms (or tendencies if you prefer)? Are you saying their are no differences, that those two terms are synonymous?

OK let's start off with a few quick definitions taken from google, Gender: either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. Gender Norms: Standards and expectations to which women and men...

Jim Just put out a video about this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5EzAh7ZkZI

I mean not really, he doesn't do reviews anymore. But the fact that some people are losing their shit over a faked picture means people need to learn to not trust everything they see on the internet.

I find it funny the Escapist has a "news" section any more. When the Escapists started putting Advertisements in the news section I thought it was stupid but whatever. Now we have re-posts of old Escapist content in the news section. More appreciated but still not news. And after a few...

"bring back"? Did they ever leave? I mean they were buried but they still existed. Bringing back implies new content, not just re-posts of old content. Honestly all this really does for me is remind me when the escapist had more content than ZP.

That's a good line up, all good games. It shows how good the SNES was for games where I could probably come up with another 21 good games beyond that. That being said it's directly in my nostalgia zone so that may be the rose tinted Glasses talking.

OK $15, a bit more than I'd like but about what I expected.

woah, never thought Blizzard would put non blizzard games in their system. I mean I know Activison owns them both But blizzards "brand" has always remained separate from Activisons other properties.

Part of me says, "there's no way they would do more than $15" But Part of me says, "this is the blizzard who has whole heartedly embraced the money grubbing Gatcha strategy in their microtransactions". So honestly it could go either way.

Just because some people use the wrong definition doesn't mean their isn't a definition. Doxxing is distributing not publicly available personal information. Yeah some people are stupid and think that being a dick to someone is OK just because you don't like them or what they do. That...