I'm not sure your summary answers to all the questions apply.
1) For question 1, I see your point. Personally, I'm "over" Fallout3 ATM, and by hours I play L4D and TF2 the most --- but these are really just social exercises for me. Evil genius was a Sick amount of fun, but "I'm between games right now" is probably the best way to put it --- playing a lot of demos, waiting for the new stuff. Reading articles like this, etc.
2. Hrm. Yeah... you're obviously describing the zombie apocalypse, but that could be nerd cred rather than geek cred. Not exactly the same. Could also be something entirely random. Outside games where the apocalypse is a good excuse for antisocial behavior (actually, I like the excuse in Prototype better), I don't look forward to the apocalypse --- I don't think I'm particularly well prepared.
3. I'm not sure on this one. We really never see either faction in big-war-space-battle against another worthy adversary. DS9 against the breen is the biggest battle we see --- most trek battles are many-on-one or one-on-one. Not many-on-many. Similarly, most empire battles are against "rebels" ... not organized military. this is like McGuyver vs. A-Team, but with less information. The Federation wins against the Dominion with a pretty evil bit of bio-warfare. I don't think either canon gives enough information to call it.
4. Here I completely disagree. Your description of the answer to this question is so US-centric. If 'I' were captain, 'I' would be more like Piccard. Rule of law, strategy, mind over matter, honour, duty. I like Hornblower, too. Kirk, however, is fun. Cowboy diplomacy, etc. Your question is vague --- allowing people much latitude. My first reaction would be: "for what?" Kirk's strengths are Cowboy diplomacy (maybe hubris?), intuition and his team. Piccard's strengths are stategy (intellect?), analysis and his team. Kirk is famous for cheating (Kobiashi Maru) and Piccard is famous for strategy (the piccard maneuver --- warping to point-blank range in a battle to deliver the killing blow). So ... I would say that Piccard is the better leader --- the one I would emulate. I'm not necessarily a good follower.
5. Hrm. Lego, I suppose. I have little patience for set tasks with one solution. I find even Lego somewhat limiting. It's not that I'm not good at solving puzzles --- but what's the point in assembling a large puzzle. The outcome is already known. It's not like I'd fail. I suppose it's the same with Lego. No possibility of failure. What my motivation for this scene?
Actually, I'm not looking for a full time gig. I read the escapist because I think about the games I play and like to read what other thinking people are thinking about games. I've considered writing something to submit --- but haven't met my own standards yet.
-zBeeble.