Not really, I would imagine, but that doesn't mean that this is altruistic for its own sake.Thorn14 said:.....There's gotta be a catch.
We should be thankful they are correcting such an obvious mistake? I'd like to hear your logic on that.Imperioratorex Caprae said:*reads comments, laughs* No, there's no pleasing people in regards to EA.
Generous? How is it generous to give customers who payed $70 for a game stripped down of content things that should have been in the game in the first place? Besides, it's free now, but that's only because of the negative reaction, that's only because of the backlash. If there weren't as much of a backlash then EA would have been happy selling us basic game content as paid DLC - it's only because they knew we wouldn't stand for it that they made it free instead.Steven Bogos said:This is certainly a very generous move from EA...
Thankful? No. Maybe not condescending when they have decided to do the right thing since they can't go back in time and add it to the gold build for release. I mean its like people expect them to somehow retroactively do just that, and its ridiculous. I'm not saying get all happy crappy "yay!" over it. But having a shit attitude no matter what they do, might as well just say EA is dead to those people, write them off and never buy from them again because it seems that nothing they do will ever be "right" in their eyes.008Zulu said:We should be thankful they are correcting such an obvious mistake? I'd like to hear your logic on that.Imperioratorex Caprae said:*reads comments, laughs* No, there's no pleasing people in regards to EA.
OT: So far this game has less vanilla content than Sims 3 (yes I know Sims 3 had acres of DLC/Expansions, comparing the base games here), so I am not convinced changing over to what has been described as a very minor visual enhancement is a good move.
Don't get me wrong but the people who paid full price for a game they knew to be 'stripped down' as you say deserve what they get.TKretts3 said:Generous? How is it generous to give customers who payed $70 for a game stripped down of content things that should have been in the game in the first place? Besides, it's free now, but that's only because of the negative reaction, that's only because of the backlash. If there weren't as much of a backlash then EA would have been happy selling us basic game content as paid DLC - it's only because they knew we wouldn't stand for it that they made it free instead.Steven Bogos said:This is certainly a very generous move from EA...
I wouldn't. I tried, immediately went back to sims 3. Vanilla 4, has less than vanilla 3. Even after these DLC things are added.008Zulu said:OT: So far this game has less vanilla content than Sims 3 (yes I know Sims 3 had acres of DLC/Expansions, comparing the base games here), so I am not convinced changing over to what has been described as a very minor visual enhancement is a good move.
Don't mworry my dear human/ai friend, it's a cold and calculated thing. They are only doing it because they know that they did goofed.marioandsonic said:Oh what a shock, EA withheld features so it can be bought as DLC. What a bunch of money-grubbing--
Wait..."free"? You mean it's DLC...for free?
But...but it's EA.
EA...giving DLC...for free?!
DOES NOT COMPUTE
DOES NOT COMPUTE
DOES NOT COMPUTE
You have to buy the game. I'm assuming you didn't.Thorn14 said:.....There's gotta be a catch.