Every work of art, no matter how open to interpretation, can still be broken down into the parts that make people feel one way or another.-Zen- said:Fuck English Lit. The minute that subjective material is treated objectively is the moment that a subject loses its credibility.
Science and mathematics for the goddamn win.
Point being?Substance-E said:Every work of art, no matter how open to interpretation, can still be broken down into the parts that make people feel one way or another.-Zen- said:Fuck English Lit. The minute that subjective material is treated objectively is the moment that a subject loses its credibility.
Science and mathematics for the goddamn win.
Yes, but when you are tested on it it is a different story. Also, two people can feel completely different about these parts, even the ones that seem universal.Substance-E said:Every work of art, no matter how open to interpretation, can still be broken down into the parts that make people feel one way or another.-Zen- said:Fuck English Lit. The minute that subjective material is treated objectively is the moment that a subject loses its credibility.
Science and mathematics for the goddamn win.
Well I don't know what kind of silly class you had but all of my lit classes were always about story structure and character elements. Even if we were tested on what we thought of the story we were graded on paper composition and how well we conveyed our idea, not whether we were "right or wrong" in what we thought.Manga_nerd247 said:Yes, but when you are tested on it it is a different story. Also, two people can feel completely different about these parts, even the ones that seem universal.Substance-E said:Every work of art, no matter how open to interpretation, can still be broken down into the parts that make people feel one way or another.-Zen- said:Fuck English Lit. The minute that subjective material is treated objectively is the moment that a subject loses its credibility.
Science and mathematics for the goddamn win.
The only "fun" part is writing papers on a topic that is totally ridiculous but, apparently, still valid because you can back it up. And that I titled one of my papers "The Importance of clothing in Summer (by Edith Wharton)" hehe (ugh, but don't get me started on Wharton; she is the bane of my existence) Also, greetings from AP English Lit!
Well it depended/depends on the book. Some are treated as having more symbolism than others. For example, apparently Toni Morrison novels have symbolism in every-freaking-thing. For example: "Now look on pg blah blah. Do you see how they mentioned a BLACK (OMG) chicken eating seeds? That means something good is about to happen." And that's one of the more obvious ones.Substance-E said:Well I don't know what kind of silly class you had but all of my lit classes were always about story structure and character elements. Even if we were tested on what we thought of the story we were graded on paper composition and how well we conveyed our idea, not whether we were "right or wrong" in what we thought.Manga_nerd247 said:Yes, but when you are tested on it it is a different story. Also, two people can feel completely different about these parts, even the ones that seem universal.Substance-E said:Every work of art, no matter how open to interpretation, can still be broken down into the parts that make people feel one way or another.-Zen- said:Fuck English Lit. The minute that subjective material is treated objectively is the moment that a subject loses its credibility.
Science and mathematics for the goddamn win.
The only "fun" part is writing papers on a topic that is totally ridiculous but, apparently, still valid because you can back it up. And that I titled one of my papers "The Importance of clothing in Summer (by Edith Wharton)" hehe (ugh, but don't get me started on Wharton; she is the bane of my existence) Also, greetings from AP English Lit!