~shrugs~
meh....believe in what you like i don't see why people should justify what they believe in ..
meh....believe in what you like i don't see why people should justify what they believe in ..
Anachronism said:Wrong. Insane fundamentalists with corrupted understandings of the Qu'ran caused 9/11. Do you know what "Islam" is Arabic for? "Peace". Nowhere in the Qu'ran does it support or condone the killing of others for your beliefs; it's as against killing as Christianity, or any religion is. If the Qu'ran commanded Muslims to kill Christians, why does it acknowledge Jesus as a prophet of God?Lullabye said:Also, religion is the very thing that caused 9-11. So as much as it helps, it hurts alot more.
Look, i know. I don't think there has been very many if any religions with the purpose of pure destruction. But HUMANS have a tenancy to use and abuse everything. Including religion. Most evils have good intentions you know. Hitler did. And so did those people who crashed into the towers. It is simple, blatant ignorance. WE need to fix ourselves. After that we wont even need religion.
Islam is always in favour of peace between different religions, and between all people. Religion is a way to gain an understanding of the world and of ourselves that we could not obtain through purely logical means. You cannot take a minority of fundamentalists who believe that people of other religions should be killed and use them as a way of saying "religion is wrong". They are a tiny minority who have been taught false religion by hate-filled zealots.
yeah, like I said, absolutely mind-boggling and stupidly hard to explain. That was the best I could do to explain it without going into quarks, neutrinos and all that bumpf.PurpleRain said:Toners said:well the Higgs Field is quite difficult to explain, and i haven't done this for a year, but...
Basically from what I understand, all the elemental particles (i.e. particles that can't be split down any further) don't have mass. The theory is that when these particles interact with the Higgs Field, they are slowed down from the speed of light and as such gain mass from the theory of relativity equation. This causes "existence" as we know it, supposedly. Basically, mass is an effect of the slowing down of elemental particles... at least I think that's what it is. The best way to visualise this is to imagine yourself in a swimming pool. If you stood completely still (i.e. particles inside you not vibrating, temperature at absolute zero) you would cease to exist. Since you are moving inside this field, particles travelling between infinitely small layers of Higgs Bosons (like yourself in comparison to the water molecules in the pool) will have the mass attribute.
If anyone has a better explanation without referring to an outside source, please call bullshit on me and put something better up, but not a massive splurge of scientific jargon, please
I've heard a bit about absolute zero (and by that I mean, it was on TV and I was semi destracted by staring longingly into a girls eyes, BUT-) and so what you're saying, is that if we do achieve that, and stop the particles from vibrating, without mass they... I KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN! My words trip and fail to create the doings in my head. I am very interested though.
Woah! Those are some strong acusations you're setting up. Firstly, just for the sake of understanding, you mind editing your posts slightly so I can tell what points you are talking about (I mean, like rearanging quotes and deleting stuff. The general mash up).Lullabye said:1) Now, this just shows how much faith you have in humanity when you say "If there is no god, whats stopping us from killing one another?" Well, for one, you'd be surprised at how many people like to have sex. Can't have sex if there is no one to do it with now can ya? Fact o the matter is, people have been killing each other for....well, since we started as a species i guess. We've even killed in the name of gods. Are you telling me it's okay to kill if god says so? And if you say yes, then by that logic, if anybody who I perceive as better than me or who has power over me says its okay to kill then it's a okay! I mean, if we were made to do gods bidding then whats the point of free will?
2)Yes, I do feel that what others do has a huge impact on your life. But whats that got to do with god?
3) on your last point there, your both wrong. "having a right" is a subjective concept and doesn't actually exist. How can you have a right when nothing is stopping you or limiting you besides yourself and other people?(other people can be dealt with) So no, you dont have a right to your own opinions and beliefs. But then, why do you need one?
Because it evolves the way we think and understand.sorry user name taken. said:~shrugs~
meh....believe in what you like i don't see why people should justify what they believe in ..
Re read the OP. I don't talk about Christianity.Moccamonster said:Snip
No stay! You may learn something. I am.Sheepzor said:Ah right, my bad - My current opinion is that if it gets any muggier my brain will cease to function outright! But I saw the word God spouted about a few times and something about Physics, so I thought I would chip in...I shall doff my hat and bid ado!
You didn't read the OP did you? I'm saying that god doesn't live in a physical world, and so defies what logic we have. You sort of proved my point in a way.LimaBravo said:You can disprove god easily. If god has no interaction and cannot be sensed then he doesnt exist to you as an individual he might exist in himself but since you nor any other living creature can demonstrate a corporeal presence it invalidates his existance.
You can say unicorns exist but since no one has seen one and no one has touched one they do not until someone finds one.
To cite my most hated example of the soft sciences interpretation of theory 'There are no black swans' The correct phrase is their are no black swans so far.
Until you see a black swan they dont exist in the consciousness of humanity and therefore dont exist.
What cannot be measured and interacted with is irrelevant and therefore non-existant. Sure you might think alien zeta waves are giving you telepathic powers but they arent so ....
(This isnt to say their arent particles to yet discover but their macro effects are a no go.)
Not exactly as I understand agnosticism. I personally think it this way: I think that we can never have definitive proof or evidence for or against the existance of an all-powerful god. Therefore, any claim, stance or guess we make of such a being is by necessity based on faith or lack of faith. Thus I'm Agnostic: We can never truly know for certain.Anachronism said:No such thing. An agnostic is undecided; an atheist does not believe in God. You can't be both.SakSak said:As an FYI, I'm an agnostic atheist.
I agree with Rain on this one; there are plenty of things you can't explain by logic. Continuing with the theme of my previous posts, how do you explain love and friendship by logic? I won't go into the reasons why I'd argue you can't, because I'd just be repeating myself.PurpleRain said:This is quite narrow minded of you. How do you prove something utterly illogical with logic?SakSak said:Otherwise an interesting OP, but with one tiny mistake...
You can prove ANYTHING with pure logic. Since logic by itself makes no stance regarding the premises the logical chain is built upon (And simply assumes them wrong/right), I can quite easily prove I'm the king of the universe.
Yes, i know, but not having read the Q'uran or any other religious book, i cannot judge about them.PurpleRain said:Re read the OP. I don't talk about Christianity.Moccamonster said:Snip
I once heard an interesting way to put this, though I can't remember who said it.freakaknight said:we diverse into nothing? what is nothing? how can we think about what nothing is if nothing is nothing.
Again, you have proved my point. You have stated that you view the universe to how your sense and physical evidence. I have said, this is where logic dwells. It ends here too. I'm talking things beyond our senses and physical planes. Logic no longer applies.SakSak said:That's what seems to be the misunderstanding here. By logic itself you cannot prove anything about the real world. All you can get with logic and philosophy is 'I think, therefore I am' before you have to make assumptions. And logic cannot be used to determine the validity of those assumptions. You need something else to test them with, usually our senses and some kind of physical evidence.
One of my assumptions is that the universe as mostly correctly presented by my senses is in fact real and by examining it I can make predictions of it. In essence, I assume that the 'Matrix-scenario' is untrue.
I see what you mean and agree. While I was mostly talking out of metaphor, we can expain this. Perhaps love and friendship is like the vibrations of noise or a blind man using other senses to guide him. Perhaps emotions are bigger then how we see them. They are the small reverbes we pick up.Kukul said:Your way of thinking has one flaw: a blind animal can't go trough a wall because it doesn't see it, a deaf man can feel soundwaves, we can measure different types of radiation and matter we don't see, hear, smell, feel or taste, because we can observe the effects of it's interaction with the world surrounding us. It's possible that there are some forces or fenomena hidden from us, but they don't seem to affect us, so it doesn't matter much.PurpleRain said:An animal born without eyes or any idea of sight, how would it understand light? It could not comprehend light or the spectrum or colours.
So why are we only limited to five senses? That can't be all of them? There's more. I find it kind of close-minded to think otherwise.
Okay, now I feel you're ignoring what I was saying and sort of proving it. I said scared people cling to logic as it has bounds and is safe.Moccamonster said:Snip
Good words that I also sometimes think about. I generally believe that we shed our physical selves and perhaps come to an understanding of these other planes we cannot compriehend with our eyes or ears. These are physical things our body parts, and can only pick up other physical things.freakaknight said:-Snip-
Oh and i'm loving the user name btw, kind of fits, deep meaningful thoughts and topics and 'purple rain' =]
Okay, a debate about religion is quite uninteresting but a debate regarding the applicability of logic....Ahh. Here's the interesting thing, how can you say logic no longer applies?PurpleRain said:Again, you have proved my point. You have stated that you view the universe to how your sense and physical evidence. I have said, this is where logic dwells. It ends here too. I'm talking things beyond our senses and physical planes. Logic no longer applies.SakSak said:That's what seems to be the misunderstanding here. By logic itself you cannot prove anything about the real world. All you can get with logic and philosophy is 'I think, therefore I am' before you have to make assumptions. And logic cannot be used to determine the validity of those assumptions. You need something else to test them with, usually our senses and some kind of physical evidence.
One of my assumptions is that the universe as mostly correctly presented by my senses is in fact real and by examining it I can make predictions of it. In essence, I assume that the 'Matrix-scenario' is untrue.