I find it funny that Spider Jerusalem of all people is too naive to catch on
I noticed you didn't have a counter-point for #3, but I can't really think of what a good counter-point might be so let's just say it covers both bases. I think the problem with this entire argument is that it's usually not the same people making contrary arguments to defend their game. People tend to latch onto one side or the other, even if both can be applied.
Take for instance the idea that a person who hates rock probably shouldn't review a rock concert. It only makes sense to try for an unbiased review. On the other hand the problem with fans is that they will label a reviewer as "a hater" and claim they never liked/understood the genre in the first place.
I've never quite understood why people respond to reviews with a review of the reviewer rather than with their own thoughts on the product/event.
I noticed you didn't have a counter-point for #3, but I can't really think of what a good counter-point might be so let's just say it covers both bases. I think the problem with this entire argument is that it's usually not the same people making contrary arguments to defend their game. People tend to latch onto one side or the other, even if both can be applied.
Take for instance the idea that a person who hates rock probably shouldn't review a rock concert. It only makes sense to try for an unbiased review. On the other hand the problem with fans is that they will label a reviewer as "a hater" and claim they never liked/understood the genre in the first place.
I've never quite understood why people respond to reviews with a review of the reviewer rather than with their own thoughts on the product/event.