No, what he's actually saying is that Pepsi got into the soft drink business while Coke was the big dog in the pen, and in order to get word out about its product, it created 'The Pepsi Challenge'. He's saying that Pepsi had to do what EA is trying to do, get mentioned alongside the leading brand in order to make people aware of its existence.-Dragmire- said:Ah, so it's equating the flavor of Pepsi to the quality of games EA publishes.Grey Carter said:More than it's a harsh insult. Pepsi is revolting horror juice.-Dragmire- said:Sorry, I don't understand what you're trying to say here. Are you saying Pepsi is an extreme underdog or their marketing ploys are bad?Grey Carter said:Coke didn't do the Coke challenge, Pepsi did the Pepsi challenge," he said, (ouch. Comparing EA to Pepsi is like an eleven on a scale of one to "harsh")
Maybe it's because Pepsi is my soft drink of choice but I just don't get it.
That doesn't work with me due to my love of the Pepsi flavor and hate for EA(the company/Origin, not necessarily the games it publishes though I won't buy any game that requires Origin).
As for the topic, we shouldn't even be giving these two any of our attention; the games should stand up on their own, regardless of how mature or immature the CEOs are acting, or the marketing campaigns they put out.