thepyrethatburns said:
Y'know, whenever someone talks about how well TFA is doing at the box office as proof of how good it is, I can just point to this now as a counterpoint.
And when you do, I'll point at this movie's 0% RT rating vs TFA's 93% RT rating. I'm not saying that the people who use box office success are wrong, necessarily. You can't judge a movie just by how well it does at the box office, after all. But I always find it kind of confusing that the best selling Star Wars movie of all time, as well as the most well-received critically Star Wars Movie since Empire Strikes Back, is considered not only the worst in the series, but bad movie at all. Not to one's taste, certainly, but there's a difference between that and flat-out bad.
OT: Watched doesn't mean finished, and as I've found out over the years, when companies start throwing out numbers like "most watched" or "most anticipated" without any solid numbers backing it up, they're hiding something. I'm not saying they haven't gotten quite a few views, mind you. But let's say they've gotten 60 million views so far, and each view earns them $10 from ad revenue. Sounds good, but not all of that money goes to Netflix. Let's say 25% of that goes to the cast and crew because they weren't dumb enough to ask for net profit percentages.
$600 million/4=$150 million. $600-$150=$450 million. Assuming no further costs (which there may well be), that might not be enough to cover the cost of the movie, because Adam Sandler tends to use pricey locales as vacation...er, shooting locations.