Clashero said:
Perhaps you didn't notice, but if you want to explore San Francisco in a Fallout game, you needn't look any further than Fallout 2.
What does the isometric view have to do with this?
And OF COURSE I know you know that 3 wasn't the first game of the series. Christ, does everything need to be made so clear? It was a figure of speech, referring to the great amount of people who played Fallout 3 and hadn't even heard of the series up until then.
I apologize, I acted without properly thinking. My main problem was why you saw fit to quote myself rather than make a standalone post, I can be rather defensive at times. I apologize for that.
I do remember something about SF in fallout now (I read up on the story when I was brought in on 3 and just forgot everything but the basic plot of the past games). I had to look it up to remind myself but yes you are right there was a small bit of SF in fallout 2. I just would like to see a game that took place in all of SF rather than a relatively small part.
While I would love to play Fallout 1 & 2, I have no idea where I may buy them in reliable quality.
So once again I apologize for my defensiveness. I have always just had problems with perceived slams against my intelligence. It is one of the few things that I pride myself on and one of the few things that is repeatedly attacked, and sometimes I just snap.
Edit: On isometric view, it is one of the things that always seems to come up when people talk about original fallout versus fallout 3. It is a standard argument made by fans of the original, and figured it was a main point of your unsaid argument. Again I snap and don't think straight.