There's why, it's so far behind that DX10 and vista are old news, bringing out a 'showcase' for them would be like showcasing the very best PS2 can offer. The cost of upgrading it to make use of DX11 and W7 is probably enormous.johnman said:I find it confusing since this game was one of the showcases for Dx-10 and vista,
I know I hate it when one person is left out when it comes to video games, but you know what I hate more than exclusives? Exclusives that come out for one console but then are also realeased on another at a later date with brand new content that you won't be able to access on the orginal... It's like a huge fuck you to the people that bought it first.comadorcrack said:In the words of Darth Vader
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO......
Actually I'm not that upset, I just don't like the idea of exclusives...
I've never seen that, not once. The only time I've seen complaints is when shoddy console ports find their way onto the PC with an obvious lack of effort put in.Psychosocial said:When a 360 game is released for PC/360, Microsoft are stupid for releasing it on PC as well.
But the problem is that microsoft get all money from pc user base so if more and more users will go away from windows platform (linux is getting rapid user base from goverment use) then what does stand a million $ loss compared to 1-2 billion $ loss in 4 months. In short view doing more profit is great for them but in long term not supporting pc will hurt them in future skinny wallet.D_987 said:If the game is "no big deal" when then why act so outraged?
At the end of the day the cost of creating the game for the PC was probably too high considering the sheer amount of time spent developing the game, period (Bearing in mind developing for the PC requires a far greater time spent testing. Especially a game as old as this that may need vastly updating since the last PC screens shown). Coupled with the fact the game won't sell well on the PC in comparison to the 360 (and Microsoft want an exclusive comparable to Heavy Rain) the developers probably thought poor sales (and higher levels of piracy) would bring down profit for a title they have obviously spent a great deal of money developing.
Of course this is just speculation - it's not exactly something they can just come out and say something like that, so they make this bullshit excuse up. Regardless the game looks great and I'll still buy it...
Somehow I doubt you're in a better position to judge the PC gaming worlds position than Microsoft...destroyer2k said:But the problem is that microsoft get all money from pc user base so if more and more users will go away from windows platform (linux is getting rapid user base from goverment use) then what does stand a million $ loss compared to 1-2 billion $ loss in 4 months. In short view doing more profit is great for them but in long term not supporting pc will hurt them in future skinny wallet.D_987 said:If the game is "no big deal" when then why act so outraged?
At the end of the day the cost of creating the game for the PC was probably too high considering the sheer amount of time spent developing the game, period (Bearing in mind developing for the PC requires a far greater time spent testing. Especially a game as old as this that may need vastly updating since the last PC screens shown). Coupled with the fact the game won't sell well on the PC in comparison to the 360 (and Microsoft want an exclusive comparable to Heavy Rain) the developers probably thought poor sales (and higher levels of piracy) would bring down profit for a title they have obviously spent a great deal of money developing.
Of course this is just speculation - it's not exactly something they can just come out and say something like that, so they make this bullshit excuse up. Regardless the game looks great and I'll still buy it...