Alleged Underage Porn Sales Ban Suicide Girls From Comic-Con

Vivka

New member
Jun 24, 2010
8
0
0
From Missy Suicide's blog:


There's been a lot of talk on the internets about SuicideGirls being banned from Comic-Con and I wanted to clarify some things and publicly ask for a clarification from Comic-Con.

For the last 4 years we have been sharing booths with partners at Comic-Con and manning our own booths at Wondercon. We love all these conventions and have a great time at them every year signing books and taking photos with our fans.

After our appearance at Wondercon we were told by a Comic-Con employee that we were banned from Comic-Con because a board member saw an underage person being handed a dvd. This is against our policies which are to card anyone under 30. Our own head of operations was at the booth, and personally instructed the girls on our policies. We also have a sign up at all conventions saying that you must be 18+ with ID to purchase. We just don't believe this happened.

So we asked Comic-Con if we could discuss the issue with them and understand how this could have happened. But they didn't return any of our calls and then when we tweeted about it and it got picked up by the press, they told the press that we weren't banned, it was just an issue of them not having any boothspace for us.

So were we banned or not? We honestly didn't know.

So next we decided to talk to our previous booth mates and see if we could share their booth with them again this year. Surely if Comic-con was telling reporters we weren't banned then there wouldn't be any problems. They explained they were told by Comic-Con that if any
SuicideGirls were at their booth selling and signing SuicideGirls products, they would be escorted from the floor and they would lose their booth.

One of our previous partners told us the Comic-Con people were IRATE about the whole thing. Word on the street is that because of the fact that the location of Comic-Con 2012 is up in the air the entire city of San Diego is bending over backwards and kissing their ass. So perhaps they don't have time to clear this up, for a little website.

We understand the Comic-Con people can decide to ban us because we don't fit their new Dinseyfied big movie money vision for Comic-Con. We think comic culture has always been rooted in outsiders and artists and weirdos and geeks and the people we at SuicideGirls feel are our
folks. But if we're being banned in pursuit of million dollar movie marketing budgets can they publicly acknowledge it at least?

If they want to say they've banned us, we'll stay home. But if they won't admit they've banned us, then we'd like to still be at Comic-Con. The hotel rooms and travel have already been reserved and paid for for over 40 SuicideGirls to come to San Diego from all over the world. Sure the girls could just go to some parties, but we'd really like them to have a home base booth so people could get their pictures taken with the girls.

So we're asking the Comic-Con community for help. If you have a booth at Comic-Con and would like to have SuicideGirls signing and taking pictures at it, and you are not afraid of losing your booth to the secret Comic-Con ban, please email me right away. [email protected]

We draw quite a crowd and would love to share that attention with your art or comics.

PS We hope if Comic-Con intends to escort out the girls they will let
us know ahead of time. Also we'd love to have lunch with anyone from
Comic-Con in San Diego and try to clear this up. We know we aren't as
important as the Mayor of San Diego or the head of marketing for
Marvel but we love comics and would love to be a part of your show.

PPS To everyone on the internet who has been coming to our defense and
retweeting about this, thank you so much! Your support has really made
us determined to find a way to have a presence at Comic-Con this year.
For those of you who have said we just care about the bottom line,
same as Comic-Con, we pledge 100% of the profits from whatever we sell
this year at Comic-Con to our friends at the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund.


xoxo
-missy
SuicideGirls
 

Vivka

New member
Jun 24, 2010
8
0
0
Blind Sight said:
This reeks of faulty logic, this guy says he saw a person under the age of 18 purchase pornographic material, yet he presents no evidence to support his claim. On top of that, if this was the case, then does he really have the right to critique them when he didn't stop the underage individual?
it reeks of scapegoat.
They say SG is banned, then not, then secretively yes ... I doubt the event of underage sales ever even happened.
 

RowdyRodimus

New member
Apr 24, 2010
1,154
0
0
I don't think many people are going to make a trip to COmic Con for the Suicide Ho's, but a lot of people go there for a little company called Marvel Comics. Now, considering Marvel is owned by Disney, maybe the directors at the con decided it would be better to get rid of the Sleazebag Girls so a company like Disney didn't pull out (Which is something the STD Girls dad's should've done).

Besides, they should go to the AVN awards or something instead of ComicCon.
 

Cody211282

New member
Apr 25, 2009
2,892
0
0
Blimey said:
Cody211282 said:
Blimey said:
Why should we care? Suicide Girl's are just a bunch of attention-hungry posers.
Not to mention they aren't that good looking.
Agreed. I mean hell, I'm all for 'alternative' culture (even though is fucking hypocritical). But the Suicide Girl's just try to ride the waves of success based on pandering to a nerds fantasy that a "hard-core" girl would ever give him more then a second glance.
I don't get why people think nerds like "hard-core" girls. Hell all the tattoos make me think they have hepatitis and the amount of makeup and black make me think they are emos, hell I can't find anything good there.
 

samsonguy920

New member
Mar 24, 2009
2,921
0
0
danpascooch said:
If undercover police officers are allowed to pose as buyers of drugs for drug busts, why is posing as a buyer of alcohol entrapment?
It isn't technically entrapment, but there is a very fine line that lawyers drool over to get any case dismissed. Enforcement has to be very careful.
 

Vivka

New member
Jun 24, 2010
8
0
0
Haakong said:
what really boggles my mind, is what you do at their boot. i mean... you talk to some of the girls posing nude at a webpage and... seriously, why is that such a big deal? can someone please elaborate?
At the SuicideGirl's booths you talk with the girls, get your photo taken, buy merch or memberships, and have your stuff signed.
People who are into the site love meeting the girls and having their stuff signed... and usually there are items that can only be bought at certain events [such as the Hack/Slash variant cover, only on sale at the SDCC 2yrs ago]
 

tkioz

Fussy Fiddler
May 7, 2009
2,301
0
0
I doubt it's over morality, but because of liability, if they knew about this stuff happening and didn't do anything to prevent it and it hit the news, Comic-Con would be in for a world of hurt, both in the press (like geeks need more bad press) and the courts (ouch... jail time)
 

Giantcain

New member
Oct 29, 2009
346
0
0
Cliff_m85 said:
Kid's shouldn't be exposed to pornography! Nudity is EVIL!!!!

*swats Calumon away from porn and directs him to the healthier "Gears of War 3" booth, where those under 18 can see a far healthier chain-sawin'*
a healthy chainsaw?
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
danpascooch said:
AndyFromMonday said:
Overreacting much? It's just porn and nothing bad ever came from watching it.
It could be a PR disaster if news got out that Comic Con was allowing booths that sell porn to minors to be set up.

It is an unfortunate, but reasonable move.
That "overreaction" thing applied to the 18+ law as well.
 

Endocrom

New member
Apr 6, 2009
1,242
0
0
Not exactly related but it reminds me of something.

I saw a suicide girls hardcover 'photography book' in a bookstore (2nd shelf from the bottom), twenty feet to my left was the kids section.

Just an observation.
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
manaman said:
AndyFromMonday said:
Overreacting much? It's just porn and nothing bad ever came from watching it.
Oh, I could disagree, and show tons of studies about the adverse effects of pornographic material on those who are not mature enough to handle the material, but something tells me you would just disagree with it on the very faulty "I watched it and I am fine" basis.
I'm all eyes and ears.
 

atombeast707

New member
Dec 8, 2009
307
0
0
AndyFromMonday said:
Overreacting much? It's just porn and nothing bad ever came from watching it.
as far as i know, suicide girls isn't even porn. just nude models.

oh, and btw, i was at wonder con, and some of the artists were showing off nude drawings. just saying. just out in the open and everything.and i think SG had a booth there, and there wasnt anything outstanding about it, in fact if i hadnt known already what it was (im aa horny lil bastard, and there pretty fucking hot some of em) i would not have assumed they were selling adult (not pornographic) material
 

SextusMaximus

Nightingale Assassin
May 20, 2009
3,508
0
0
Doddsickle said:
Pffft... kids'll get it on the interwebs anyway...
Banning them is a bit like putting the "Are you 18 years or older?" thing on mature game trailers. It's just to please the government and law.