Xan Krieger said:
leontyrone said:
Xan Krieger said:
Can we still at least have wars?
What would be the need?
Good question and I do believe I have a few answers for that.
1. Distract people from something like a failing economy
2. In a hundred years we'll have made so many video games about the wars of the past that it'll be impossible to come up with new ideas. There would even be games about the war of 1812 and WW1. Endless renditions of old wars. We'd need new ones for new video games to be based off.
3. it helps advance human technology.
1. Distract people from something like a failing economy
In my vision of how the world could be, there would be no need of an economy nor a government, it is because of economies and governments that the world is in such bad shape.
2.In a hundred years we'll have made so many video games about the wars of the past that it'll be impossible to come up with new ideas. There would even be games about the war of 1812 and WW1. Endless renditions of old wars. We'd need new ones for new video games to be based off.
If all you can think of for the future of video games is war, then you aren't thinking hard enough, the video game universe is not limited to wars, there are plenty of other genres and subjects, and not all video game wars have to be based upon human history.
3.it helps advance human technology
Advances in technology are driven by necessity, not entirely by war. Show me one good, helpful invention that was the result of a war.