i think the host got it or at least i think i saw a smile thereJamous said:Oh god the over 9000 sins. OVER 9000 SINS!!! And she didn't get it. I lol'd.
I wasn't suggesting that anyone attack them on a physical and/or terminal level, merely providing a counter point to the people who are treating this event as though anonymous have dealt the death blow to the WBC.shogunblade said:Let's put it in this context: You can only write the word 'fag' so many times before you either run out of money or you have to start talking about firewood or cigarettes.chemicalfire said:Shutting down their websites is all well and fine if you're looking for a practical-joke level of annoyance. However, a group like the WBC thrives on pissing people off and they'll just buy up some more domain names and make more websites. Ddos'ing their hate sites won't keep them from being a bunch of clownshoes, it just gives them something else to be asshats about.
If it means they have to go back to the stone-age way of spreading hate (I.E. - Fliers and posters on the street), is it really going to hurt anybody? They are at least attacking in the most non-lethal and non physical way possible.
You say that like there aren't already groups who do that.Ivan Torres said:I agree with anonymous on this one. But I really don't like the fact that people can go around and hack anything they want, I know so far they haven't done anything that I strongly disagree with (asides from wikileaks). But they're completely anonymous and I think it's only a matter of time until some rogue group goes and starts hacking harmless websites, and people's facebook profiles.
AHMEN TO THANK. :T Buncha crazy weirdos.=HCFS=Discoman said:ah, it's at times like these when we should be thankful for anonymous.
too bad anon can't make that church be COMPLETELY silent.