I love all the people saying anonymous is not organised or is all talk, well what have they done in the last year
The mastercard fiasco
Got the chairman of the HBGary fired
DDOS'd quite a few websites resulting in loss of time, information and money
Been aired on TV against the westboro baptist church and hacked their site
Increased freedom of speech by allowing wikileaks to publish more content (e.g. Zimbabwe)
Those are the ones I can think of the top of my head in the last year, there are more. To say they do nothing now is just plain ignorant
creager91 said:
You know, its gotten to the point where they seem more like cyber terrorists rather than revolutionaries. What sony did albeit of questionable ethics was still perfectly legal which is more than can be said for anon. What really gets me tho is that they seem to think that they are trying to do a good thing and "freedom of speech" and all that nonsense that they preach. to which I ask then why the hell are you wasting your efforts on a company thats following the rules.
These technology and copyright laws are fairly new with grey areas and uncertainty, these new laws are likely to be changed and if it can force a company to give up information then it wouldn't surprise me if it will change
Just because something is lawful doesn't make it good, slavery used to be legal does that make it good?