Anonymous Threatens Internet With "Operation Blackout"

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
Well, in theory the internet can be taken down that way.

I suppose we find out on Saturday.

Also a friend of mine tells me that you can get around this by directly inputting the IP adresses of the site you want.
 

BaronIveagh

New member
Apr 26, 2011
343
0
0
Worgen said:
Ultimately I think this is a bad idea. I mean we know about it now and why they want to but unless people can easily understand why it happens then they will just assume the worst and treat it as such, the reason the website blackouts were effective is they told people why it was happening and gave them an easy link to their reps.
Well, the thing is they don't say 'How' they're going to do it. Which means there is nearly nothing that can be done to prevent it. For all we know, they've got vans parked across the street from each one loaded with a HERF weapon. (which would make sense given the name)
 

Zigot66

New member
Aug 21, 2009
49
0
0
TitanAura said:
I am seriously doubting the authenticity of this threat. Seeing as how ANYONE can claim to be anonymous, it doesn't mean the entire collective is for shutting THEMSELVES down. Why in the hell would you attempt to shut down the collective's ability to communicate with one another? How would they know when Operation Blackout is over if there is no set date?

Not only that, but anonymous usually has a habit of claiming credit for an attack *after they've already done it.*
First, they would be shutting down the HTTP aspect of the internet, there's more to it than just the websites most people are familiar with see. If they are tech savy enough to do what they say they will, they will know how to communicate through the other channels.

Second, the date is right there March 31, the time is up in the air, but that's just because they don't know how long they would be able to make it last.

Third, they don't cease to exist without the internet, I might just have misunderstood that part, but they're not shutting themselves down, they've shutting off the most popular part of the internet.
 

evilneko

Fall in line!
Jun 16, 2011
2,218
49
53
weirdguy said:
my god, we'll have to resort to ip addresses

actually i don't really know how this thing works anyway
Kapol said:
In theory, it should be possible to connect to a website via entering their IP address instead of the domain name. That should create a direct connection if I'm not mistaken, bypassing the DNS altogether and allowing you to connect. But I'm not entirely sure.
Simply entering IP addresses may work for some websites, but will not work for all. Many websites do not have a dedicated IP to call their own. Instead, they share that IP with other sites--or even subdomains of the same site. In this case, entering the IP address will either get you an error or a generic page that is none of these sites, or forwarded to whatever is the default site on that server.

Besides, you gonna remember to go note down the IPs of all the sites you visit? ;p

There is however a way ISPs could make such a short attack meaningless: increase the cache and TTL values on their own DNS, so that they don't have to go to the root servers.

You too can run your own DNS server, or just a plain DNS cache. Look up TreeWalk or AnalogX FastCache for Windows. If you run linux, you probably already know what to look up. :p
 

DJ_DEnM

My brother answers too!
Dec 22, 2010
1,869
0
0
How I believe this is gonna go down:

*Anonymous Member X and his group of hackers has succeeded in taking down the internet. Cue Musical Number*

Anonymous Member X: *typing* We've done it! We've taken down the internet!...
*Anonymous Member X is now confused*
Anonymous Member X: Weird...the chat doesn't seem to be working. I'll try to refresh the page to see if that'll work...
*Anonymous Member X refreshes the page to get an error. He now sees what he has done*
Anonymous Member X: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

~FIN~

Captcha: The all-new Chevy Sonic

Apparently the captcha won't accept "The all-new Chevy Shitbox". I think mods need to fix this.
 

Bob_F_It

It stands for several things
May 7, 2008
711
0
0
And the people of Anonymous shoot themselves in the foot AGAIN, because quite frankly this doesn't spread a message; quite the opposite - it stems the flow of information, and people will not know what the fuss is about unless the news tells them.
 

Richardplex

New member
Jun 22, 2011
1,731
0
0
Funny, I read something when SOPA was still kicking about about anonymous doing exactly this. And they didn't do it. So I'm calling BS on this.
 

Kapol

Watch the spinning tails...
May 2, 2010
1,431
0
0
evilneko said:
weirdguy said:
my god, we'll have to resort to ip addresses

actually i don't really know how this thing works anyway
Kapol said:
In theory, it should be possible to connect to a website via entering their IP address instead of the domain name. That should create a direct connection if I'm not mistaken, bypassing the DNS altogether and allowing you to connect. But I'm not entirely sure.
Simply entering IP addresses may work for some websites, but will not work for all. Many websites do not have a dedicated IP to call their own. Instead, they share that IP with other sites--or even subdomains of the same site. In this case, entering the IP address will either get you an error or a generic page that is none of these sites, or forwarded to whatever is the default site on that server.

Besides, you gonna remember to go note down the IPs of all the sites you visit? ;p

There is however a way ISPs could make such a short attack meaningless: increase the cache and TTL values on their own DNS, so that they don't have to go to the root servers.

You too can run your own DNS server, or just a plain DNS cache. Look up TreeWalk or AnalogX FastCache for Windows. If you run linux, you probably already know what to look up. :p
Right, I was actually looking into that and just found the fact IP addresses are often shared out. But I was actually looking into finding out all the IPs of websites I would want to visit, just in case, when I found that out. I'm actually studying CNS right now, but most of what I'm doing is with setting up the routers and routes, not dealing with the DNS quite yet. :p

But the ISP thing is if they take the attack seriously. Which, given the situation is a bit iffy to begin, I doubt many will do. Might have to look into the running my own DNS server just a precaution though.
 

ResonanceSD

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,538
5
43
Bob_F_It said:
And the people of Anonymous shoot themselves in the foot AGAIN, because quite frankly this doesn't spread a message; quite the opposite - it stems the flow of information, and people will not know what the fuss is about unless the news tells them.

EVERYTHING WE DO MAKES OUR POTENTIAL SUPPORTERS HATE US!

WHAT DO WE DO?

DO IT SOME MORE! MAYBE THEY'LL CHANGE THEIR MINDS!!!

dumbasses.
 

wintercoat

New member
Nov 26, 2011
1,691
0
0
Didn't this already get denied on Twitter and Facebook by Anonymous? Coulda sworn this first came out last month or so, and they already said it's just some fuckwit using the name Anonymous to get more attention.
 

Blunderboy

New member
Apr 26, 2011
2,224
0
0
How does this punish the people they are complaining about exactly? I don't think the world leaders spend their weekends playing Starcraft online. Pretty sure big bankers don't spend it making youtube comments too.
 

evilneko

Fall in line!
Jun 16, 2011
2,218
49
53
Kapol said:
Might have to look into the running my own DNS server just a precaution though.
I've had bind running on my linux box for a few years now. ;)

(There are simpler options, but I wanted the experience of using bind)
 

DTH1337

New member
Feb 27, 2012
163
0
0
So let me get this straight.

Anonymous have been saying that the internet represents their ideals like freedom of speech and whatnot, and this is also the same group that (along with many other groups and websites) opposed SOPA and PIPA because the bills could potentially destroy the internet.

And now they are going to do the one thing that they have protested against?

You see, this is what I'm talking about. Anonymous have degraded themselves so much because of stupid things like this. They don't care about the people anymore, and quite frankly, I'm not so sure they ever have cared.

Anonymous, please. Stop, just stop. The people have had enough. You just don't represent the people anymore and you're nothing but a complete and utter joke.

Sorry for this rant, but they are just getting on my nerves now.

Note: I'm aware they have said that they are not going to "destroy" or "kill" the internet, but that still doesn't change my opinion of them.
 

JasonBurnout16

New member
Oct 12, 2009
386
0
0
I'd be really interested to see if this will work. The premise seems simple, but I imagine pulling it off isn't.
 

Terminate421

New member
Jul 21, 2010
5,773
0
0
They shut down the entire internet, we will have Anarchy. Also....Never mind, I was going to say I have no porn but then I realized I have a USB for taht.
 

Killermud

New member
Oct 6, 2010
62
0
0
Im not too bothered by this, even if they do manage to take down the root DNS servers, many of the websites we visit will still be visit-able. In fact if youve visited the site previously, its likely that your browser has stored that address and IP address in a cache, this to save having to constantly query DNS servers. If by chance you visit a website you have never been to before it is probably cached on your ISP's DNS servers, if not then you probably wont be able to view it.

Bottom line, dont panic it probably wont effect us too badly.
 

Ldude893

New member
Apr 2, 2010
4,114
0
0
Not Anonymous.

Shutting down an entire form of infrastructure? Come on, they already stated they're not doing that after the NSA claimed they were going to bring down power grids. It's just an attempt to smear Anonymous, to give authorities a better excuse to hunt down the members of Anonymous (which of course is impossible considering the nature of Anonymous) and nothing else.

Or it could just be some wannabee idiot.
 

BaronIveagh

New member
Apr 26, 2011
343
0
0
wintercoat said:
Didn't this already get denied on Twitter and Facebook by Anonymous? Coulda sworn this first came out last month or so, and they already said it's just some fuckwit using the name Anonymous to get more attention.
Yeah, it did, and was originally put forward by the NSA, not anonymous, but I'm dying to see if someone does it anyway.
 

VonKlaw

New member
Jan 30, 2012
386
0
0
Bobic said:
That's it, they have officially moved into the realms of internet terrorism. We don't like what a specific group is doing so we're going to attack everyone regardless of how related to the offending party they are or even if they are against them.

Of course, saying that would make them feel good, so I'll go back to referring to them as being on the same level as angsty teenagers breaking glass windows and tearing down posters thinking that makes them 'hardcore'.
100% this. If (and I doubt they will anyway) do this, it will just provide as much ammo as angry middle-aged politicians need to ensure that the internet turns into some police enforced hell-hole. They seem to forgot that if it was Al-Queda or Iran threatening to do this, people WOULD be calling it terrorism, yet they want us to label them as crusaders for internet freedom.
 

Realitycrash

New member
Dec 12, 2010
2,779
0
0
How is this going to get them support, and hurt the "bankers" (or whatever "evil" they claim to b after)? Oh, it's to demonstrate how the world would be without the internet? I thought we did that in a nice, free, legit way just a month ago?