Yeah, he should have said not AnonOps.SirBryghtside said:Someone says they're Anonymous, then they're Anonymous. Doesn't work any other way.Ldude893 said:Not Anonymous.
Shutting down an entire form of infrastructure? Come on, they already stated they're not doing that after the NSA claimed they were going to bring down power grids. It's just an attempt to smear Anonymous, to give authorities a better excuse to hunt down the members of Anonymous (which of course is impossible considering the nature of Anonymous) and nothing else.
Or it could just be some wannabee idiot.
Implying that "nice, free, legit demonstrations" accomplish anything. Not that this stunt (assuming they pull it off) will do much more than inconvenience EVERYONE (yes even Big Business) for a moment...Realitycrash said:How is this going to get them support, and hurt the "bankers" (or whatever "evil" they claim to b after)? Oh, it's to demonstrate how the world would be without the internet? I thought we did that in a nice, free, legit way just a month ago?
Yes, it would be difficult to pull off, but it is highly plausible. As far as I'm aware there's no real way to defend against this type of attack...BaronIveagh said:In theory it is possible. But no one has ever actually done it, so it's unknown if it will work.
From their point of view it would show just how much impact tampering with the internet via law would have, by making painfully obvious how dependent we have become on it.Jaeke said:Okay kiddies, we can see you.
Put your arms down and go back upstairs and sit in your room.
Seriously... just, why?
All this would do is prove that Anonymous are a bunch of douches and they would lose the little support they still have.