Slacktivism at its finest. Sigh.Zontar said:Because people want to feel like they've accomplished something without lifting a finger to accomplish anything.gigastar said:Why go after something so trivial?
Why are they still not adressing the core problems?
Because the core problem is the NRA. You know, the guys with guns that use them to intimitate people into scapegoating others?gigastar said:...im still missing a connection here.Zontar said:It's because the guy who was part of the latest mass shooting (which, in terms of innocent loose of African American lives, has been dwarfed by inner city shooting deaths since it occurred) was a white supremacist who flew the Confederate, Union of South Africa and Rhodesian flag (of note: people who support all three flags for their nostalgic or nationalistic symbolism where not amused by the association) so suddenly the flags are evil and stuff, so they need to be removed.gigastar said:Someone bring me up to speed here, whats all this moral outrage about flags now?
And why is it still not directed at the lack of gun control?
They've always been off the shelves, just as we've always been at war with Eurasia.
This isnt the first and most certainly isnt the most serious shooting incident in the US in the last decade. Nor will it be the last.
Why go after something so trivial?
Why are they still not adressing the core problems?
It's not necessarily that that particular flag IS evil, but it has come to REPRESENT evil. Symbols can take different meanings - just look as what the Nazis did to peaceful Buddhist (it's been used in many cultures throughout history though) symbol. We don't think, "All is well" when we see it now do we?. The people flying tend to be people filled with hate, xenophobia, and ignorance. Whatever it's past significance, "true meaning" or however else people want to the think about it. It has become, and is now, a symbol of hate. Otherwise, why does the KKK beat off to it so much? It sure as hell isn't some psuedo-noble "sovereignty of the the individual" garbage.Zontar said:It's because the guy who was part of the latest mass shooting (which, in terms of innocent loose of African American lives, has been dwarfed by inner city shooting deaths since it occurred) was a white supremacist who flew the Confederate, Union of South Africa and Rhodesian flag (of note: people who support all three flags for their nostalgic or nationalistic symbolism where not amused by the association) so suddenly the flags are evil and stuff, so they need to be removed.gigastar said:Someone bring me up to speed here, whats all this moral outrage about flags now?
And why is it still not directed at the lack of gun control?
They've always been off the shelves, just as we've always been at war with Eurasia.
It is blatantly obvious from your own admission that your judgement of what the flag means to others is derived from an ethnocentric viewpoint of Americans (including African Americans) and a narrow historical context of the Civil War, not to mention your lack of knowledge about the modern political landscape and subsequently the definition of an open market - not being a market that one 'everyone' agrees with. This is one of the most profoundly stupid censorship issues recently in America considering how many corporations are simultaneously advocating barring the flag from their products, it rivals that of Germany's eradication of Swastika memorabilia. And it is censorship, I know how certain people like to push the idea that censorship can only be administered by a government, however all is needed is to show someone the way to a dictionary. By any authority private or public (government)- "Suppressing parts deemed objectionable on moral, political, military, or other grounds."Tanklover said:People are all about free market and the like but the moment the market doesn't agree with them they start complaining, Apple is free to ban or sell whatever they want, and you're free to go somewhere else to buy it. Whether it's wrong for them to ban X or Y that is subjective and non important.
I'm not from the US or have ever lived there, BUT from what I know this flag has been used by groups such as KKK to represent themselves, and it was used by the side of a war that wanted to keep having slaves, SO, with that in mind, I could see how african americans will feel it's wrong for people to wave these flags around specially in public government buildings. As for the games that show the flag etc, I don't see a problem about historic games (not those glorifying the flag or its racists background) showing the flag specially if its for historical accuracy. But you know, someone will make some sort of website where you can buy all this shit and install it in your phone, that's the way thinks should work imo.
And for the people saying this is all a "knee jerk" reaction, I wonder how they want people to react and go about making things better once it becomes glaringly obvious it is. In Australia it seems like they banned guns after there was a really terrible shooting and they said they had enough, should they NOT have reacted to it? would that have pleased the "knee jerk" alarmists. And let's not forget that certain group of angry internet idiots got REALLY mad REALLY quickly about certain articles on the internet and in mass requested a sponsor to withdraw backing from a certain website, that sounds pretty knee jerky to me as well, yet it's not wrong when the other side does it.?
Individuals in the US are free to have their flags and wave it on their porches, even start making and selling their own flags since now they can't buy them at walmart and the like. Seems to me like they are defending a symbol for all the wrong reasons and can't even imagine how anyone might be offended by that flag when in their minds its all well and good, never bother to look at the other side of things. Guess that's what happens when your side has never been the target of so much discrimination for so long.
Except that in the case of apps it isn't a free market at all. Apple totally controls the distribution of apps on Apple devices (aka the vast majority of all mobile apps sold), and Apple and Google together control the entirety of mobile app distribution for all practical purposes. There is no free market, just monopolization by two huge mega corporations. The free market solution would be to legally forbid Apple and Google from restricting and controlling the sales of apps on their stores, so that the apps could compete with one another in an actual free market.Tanklover said:People are all about free market and the like but the moment the market doesn't agree with them they start complaining, Apple is free to ban or sell whatever they want, and you're free to go somewhere else to buy it. Whether it's wrong for them to ban X or Y that is subjective and non important.
I'm not from the US or have ever lived there, BUT from what I know this flag has been used by groups such as KKK to represent themselves, and it was used by the side of a war that wanted to keep having slaves, SO, with that in mind, I could see how african americans will feel it's wrong for people to wave these flags around specially in public government buildings. As for the games that show the flag etc, I don't see a problem about historic games (not those glorifying the flag or its racists background) showing the flag specially if its for historical accuracy. But you know, someone will make some sort of website where you can buy all this shit and install it in your phone, that's the way thinks should work imo.
And for the people saying this is all a "knee jerk" reaction, I wonder how they want people to react and go about making things better once it becomes glaringly obvious it is. In Australia it seems like they banned guns after there was a really terrible shooting and they said they had enough, should they NOT have reacted to it? would that have pleased the "knee jerk" alarmists. And let's not forget that certain group of angry internet idiots got REALLY mad REALLY quickly about certain articles on the internet and in mass requested a sponsor to withdraw backing from a certain website, that sounds pretty knee jerky to me as well, yet it's not wrong when the other side does it.?
Individuals in the US are free to have their flags and wave it on their porches, even start making and selling their own flags since now they can't buy them at walmart and the like. Seems to me like they are defending a symbol for all the wrong reasons and can't even imagine how anyone might be offended by that flag when in their minds its all well and good, never bother to look at the other side of things. Guess that's what happens when your side has never been the target of so much discrimination for so long.
Exactly this, those who cannot understand the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them and as such, media that provides an accurate account of historical events, especially in an engaging manner that facilitates education, should be offered exceptional protection rather than discriminated against, especially if said works are pertinent to current issues such as racial prejudice.Neverhoodian said:Speaking as a History major, stuff like this pisses me off. Yes it's tasteless and offensive to see racist jackasses flying Confederate flags around, but these games have nothing to do with that. It's when people start whitewashing history like this that I draw the line.
History defines us. It helps us understand the kind of people we are and how we got here. Ideally, history can help us avoid the pitfalls of the past; therefore, it is absolutely essential that every aspect of history be explored, no matter how offensive or reprehensible parts of it may be. We owe it to ourselves and future generations.
In my eyes, those that try to sweep such painful episodes under the rug like this are little better than the perpetrators of such acts.