This is basically the very simple and easy test you can do with anything.krazykidd said:Okay . Let's assume what you say is true . Let's start holding men only turnaments . Suddendly people will be crying sexism .veloper said:I don't begrudge anyone their little pleasure of a women-only tournament.
Any type of segregation goes, even down to religion and skin color, as long as it's only unimportant stuff like sports and tournaments like this one.
Let them have their own fun if X want to be seperate from the rest.
If the next fightin game tournament or whatever. Decide . Hey this is going to be an all male tornament . Shit will go down . And the worst part is . Most likely , nothing would have changed from the tournament due to the low/non-existant participation of women .
OT: this is just silly . This is basically saying , "we cannot beat guys , so will make our own tournament! With hookers ! And blackjack!". NO , what you should do is play against the guys and come out in first place . THAT's how you get takken. Seriously.
Just ask yourself, if it was the other way around, would there be an outcry?
Caucasian American college fund?
The only reason it's even viable in a professional sport environment is because there's an equivalent and there would be far more problems with a joined league due to social moors about violence against women. Which is another odd scenario which was brought up with the uppercut video where because a man was attacked by a woman and he defended himself many thought it was wrong but would of had no problem if he had hit her and then she had defended herself. Hypocrisy is a poison.