Are you actually good at gaming?

[CannibalCorpses]

I've finished almost every game ive played in the last 5 years on the hardest setting and i have quite a few top 100 leaderboard scores on a number of games. Most games last less than a day and i've pretty much stopped buying games and just rent them now for that reason.

My achilles heel though is sports and simulation games because they are even more boring than the real thing...

 

[FurinKazanNZ]

I'm decent at pretty much every game I play after a couple of "rounds" or whatever, except for racing games.

 

[ViciousTide]

I am very Strategic in FPS and RTS games. Thus very creative and usually win all the time from my created Strategies with team mates and Lone Wolf. I engineer Victory IRL. I make your Holodeck fantasies come to life. Better get your katana out for Holodeck Fruit Ninja!

 

[inFAMOUSCowZ]

When it comes to shooters, I'm good. I can hold my own and appear towards the top of the board most the time. But if its any other type of game online, I'm bad. Play ime in a racing, rts or sport game and I bet you'll win.

 

[ViciousTide]

I am very Strategic in FPS and RTS games. Thus very creative and usually win all the time from my created Strategies with team mates and Lone Wolf. I engineer Victory IRL. I make your Holodeck fantasies come to life. Better get your katana out for Holodeck Fruit Ninja!

 

[The Night Shade]

I'm pretty good in every genre except sports, racing and strategy games mostly because i don't play a lot of those genres

 

[monkey_man]

I am better than a lot of gamers, but in the games I play. I usually top or come high in he scoreboards in games I play. I have been considered a rusher, and sometimes I am. I'd give me an 7.8. decent, but definitely room for improvement

 

[The_Emperor]

I'm decent i play most games on hardcore, I'm decent at multiplayer im by no meas pro or whatever, but I think alot of fps games have alot to do with connection

 

[ruben6f]

I am 15 and play since I am 5, I am good with first person shooters (because they are all the same) and third person shooters, when it comes to driving games I suck, and I don't like to play RTS games online because I get to nervous but I am below average when I fight againts the AI so I assume I suck.

 

[Keepeas]

Any puzzle game...I can beat it.
Portal 1&2 btw are very easy(for me) but both are VERY fun puzzle games

I'm also pretty good at shooters (PC only...controllers suck)

 

[6037084]

Yes I kicked ass in Wolfenstein Enemy Territory and I'm kicking ass in TF2, but I can't play console games worth shit, I'd have more luck trying to finish Duke Nukem forever with my ears than to play any console shooter

 

[Xaio30]

I feel pretty confident in RPGs. I often figure out ways to exploit the system in different ways to complete my objectives.
I've never been able to grasp RTS games though. Strategy on a large scale is definitely not my strong side.

 

[Thespian]

I'm okay. About average on Multi-player FPS games, and pretty alright at others. Occasionally I just do something AWESOME, but I screw up a lot too.
I don't really sweat it, though.

 

[Qmonster]

I don't play FPS enough to be among the elite, but I have the reactions for it. I do pretty well at most genres, except one: RTS. Specifically, Star Craft and War Craft style, because of base building combined with army building. My latent OCD kicks in, and I can't build a base fast enough because I accidentally made my second barracks one... tile... off... and then I can't stop thinking about it! *twitch*

 

[deleted+75193]

DELETED

 

[Bacontastic]

On the PC i'm fairly good at any genre. With a controller though only Platformers. For shooters on a console you might as well just give me a stick. Darn dual sticks why u no percise! ლಠ益ಠლ I'm so darn spoiled by the good old mouse and keyboard.

 

[crop52]

Fucking shit no. Everything that I love doing, is something that I suck dick at. I'm not saying that to sound deep or anything, I just suck at stuff.

 

[ultrapowerpie]

I'm decent at games. That doesn't mean that I can go through every game on hard mode, oh no. But that doesn't mean that I suck either. I like going through on normal mode, that's all. I play to enjoy

 

[Nitrozzy7]

I'm a jack of all trades and I tend to adapt swiftly when something challenging comes up (given a save or two). At least that's how a friend of mine puts it.
What I think for my self? I learn to win the game as I play, if I feel like it. In other words, if a game is fun, interesting, and immersive for me then I will take whatever it can throw at me. That being said, I'm seeing more and more games since 2004 in which I'm the Master of the Universe or at least that's what games like Portal 2 will have me to believe. This sucks.
I don't like playing games that are built like this. I feel offended; I feel like the "gain" from all this "pain" is obsolete. I don't like that. It's like winning a staged fight. Disgusting.

 

[Iwana Humpalot]

I do consider my self as a "good" gamer, since i appear to learn most of the games i play fast, and end up dominating in multiplayer after couple days of practise (This mostly considers shooters). I'm an average rts player but i have never got into BF:series, i always get my ass handed to me in every single title i have played. Also i always start my single player games on the hardest difficulty if its not locked, if it is; i will go on normal.
..But i hate sports and driving games (without guns), i have never been good at those.