Atkinson Dismisses Game Consultation as "Unfair"

Lenny Magic

Hypochondriacal Calligrapher
Jan 23, 2009
756
0
0
Does it ever occur to him that if he just stopped opposing the R18+ Rating, he would see a substantial drop in death threats he receives?

If he were banning most paintings just because there was violence and nudity in it, people would call him loony and send him death threats by the ton.
 

Geo Da Sponge

New member
May 14, 2008
2,611
0
0
Lucane said:
"But I don't plan to back down from the fight. I started my mission and I plan to finish it." Does that sound like a R-18 movie or game qoute to anyone else?
I think he's saying he intends to Finish The Fight.

Huh.
 

Dorian6

New member
Apr 3, 2009
711
0
0
Yes the guy is a twat, but what does it say about gamers as a whole if some of us are threatening him and his family with violence? How does that help us?

Using fear to get someone to do what you want. That is the very definition of terrorism. If we are right, then why should we need to resort to that?
 

far_wanderer

New member
Oct 17, 2008
45
0
0
Since I have exactly as much authority to speak on behalf of the "gaming community" as whatever idiot nutjobs threatened the guy's family, I would like to publicly apologize for their behavior. We're sorry.

Now then. Images will not portray any more realistic a depiction of games than text descriptions, and are in fact much more prone to inaccuracies on both sides. If you want people to understand what they're voting for, make them play the game. Or at least watch it being played.

Also, if you can't even get the family-values fanatics to turn out and support you, maybe this isn't a battle you should be fighting. Gamers are lazy and a minority - if we can manage to assemble an overwhelming voice on something, that should be an important sign.
 

gim73

New member
Jul 17, 2008
526
0
0
In most elections, only about 40 percent of the population votes. Mostly, it's because the issues involved are such that the people DO NOT CARE. I myself have skipped many elections for this reason alone. I find it to be kinda disturbing that there are people out there that vote every chance they get. Just because I don't vote regularly doesn't mean some dipshit politician has the right to say my vote would make the election invalid because I chose to use my vote to do something right! Contrary to popular belief, the government does NOT exist to enforce conservative morals! Morals and law are two completely different animals. That's a very dark path you take when you make them one and the same.

Yes, by his reasoning gamers who are above 18 should NOT be allowed to vote because they would be able to get games that are designed with an audience above the age of 18. And kids would not be able to get these games because they are not 18, but will get them anyways and play games like rapelay all the time. It's precisely BECAUSE they are directly affected by his asshattery that gamers will show up and vote for the R18+ rating. Anybody who would vote against it is a complete douche that just wants to keep adult gamers from playing mature games. Poor Australia, it's bad enough that you guys get games late, but to have to deal with this crap from your politicians is beyond crap.
 

FightThePower

The Voice of Treason
Dec 17, 2008
1,716
0
0
"I'll consider changing my mind about all this when the gaming community decide to behave in a civil fashion and apologize for the threats to me and my family," he continued."But I don't plan to back down from the fight. I started my mission and I plan to finish it."

This is fair. I mean all of us have sent him threats, right? At least half of the entire videogaming community sent at least one letter bomb as well. I sent 16, personally. Not sure if any of them have got through.
 

geek.flip

New member
Jan 6, 2010
21
0
0
PhunkyPhazon said:
Alright, we need to take this up a notch. Sending him e-mails was all well and good, unless you're one of those people who just sent death threats despite being constantly warned not to do so by the rest of us...now see where that got us, thanks dicks!
The problem being that, even when we self-police, even when we use our best rhetoric and are nothing but civil and professional, people like this will continue to ignore the valid, well-reasoned counter arguments if even one angry person calls them out for being the self-administrating colon cleansing compound of dubious merit they are. However, we should still self-police and be 'civilized' because the majority of folks aren't nearly so...single-minded (and perhaps don't even care?), but if we devolve to calling these festering rectal boils what they are the masses will have a less positive impression of our pastime. Sadly, it is a bit of a no-win, but... if you let the other side paint themselves as clueless overly-zealous tools eventually they'll overstep and get removed for more photogenic, less crazy people, right? Right? Please let that be right...
 

dalek sec

Leader of the Cult of Skaro
Jul 20, 2008
10,237
0
0
He's just realizing what a hornets nest he's pissed off and is trying to save his skin now.
 

Macgyvercas

Spice & Wolf Restored!
Feb 19, 2009
6,103
0
0
Let me get this straight. A guy who releases a law under the table to censor R rated movies is calling a perfectly legitimate piece of legislation "unfair" just because he doesn't want to face the fact that he is the vocal minority that imposes their will on society that he talks about all the time? I call foul.

Seriously Atkinson: STFU and GTFO. You're a politician. Death threats come with the territory. If you don't like it, quit and do us all a favor
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,202
0
0
Wait a minute. Let me get this straight.

A public debate is "unfair", because the members of the public that have been targeted by the aggressive anti-game legislation will protest it?

Not to mention the ones getting involved, who want an R-18 rating, are mature adults who enjoy violent/sexual content: the same people that Atkinson claims do not exist, or are somehow deviants. It is somehow "unfair" for these people to campaign for looser restrictions on videogames, because they enjoy videogames?

That's like saying it's "unfair" for people who support skating to campaign in a public debate regarding anti-skating laws.

Looks like another Failkinson to me.

 

jimduckie

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,218
0
0
gee this guy won't quit , people will buy games regardless of a rating anyway and even buy for underage people

if i lived in australia ,i would buy restricted games for minors , hey it's not alcohol or cigarettes and would keep them busy

gee my 1000 post ... wohoo
 

Eatbrainz

New member
Mar 2, 2009
1,016
0
0
Of course the majority of people who are for the ratings are gamers, anyone who doesnt care about games wont care about a FUCKING RATING SYSTEM!