I'm not defending the right to see child abuse online. If the act is illegal then the site that hosts it and the people behind it should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The fact is that if a law gets put into place allowing the government to censor anything then they will slowly add to that power.maninahat said:*snip*
I do understand that this is being done by private entities, but I do not believe that it is an ISPs job to do anything beyond provide access to the internet.
I understand the want to remove unwanted filth from the internet, but it's not going to happen simply due to the nature of how the internet operates. I mean, hell, even if you take the internet down completely then we're just going to see shadownets pop up with people posting whatever the hell they want with no real way to stop them. I say use the internet to track down people doing illegal shit and throw the book at them, but censoring it will simply put people who have no interest in doing illicit things online in a lurch. Criminals have their methods of bypassing governmental restrictions already (I mean hell I posted one of the most popular ways in this thread). I feel that the fight against filth online is pretty well the same loosing battle that developers have against DRM, the tighter things get locked down the more inventive criminals become. With that in mind, why not destroy censorship online completely and cast the net wide, with the blacklists non-existent catching careless idiots would be cake.