Thanks.Vendor-Lazarus said:I just had to quote you on that, and perhaps compel you to study that sentence more in-depth.SidheKnight said:The original Half-Life.
Everybody makes references to it and I'm tired of not getting them. Also the consensus is that this is one of the best FPSes of all time. I'm sure this game was awesome compared to it's contemporaries, but playing it today, it bores me. All of the revolutionary innovations that distinguished the original Half-Life, today are commonplace in most shooters.
Also, the story is nowhere near as good as people told me it was, and I think it's not even finished yet? (Maybe that's the reason for all the Half-Life 3 craze).
Those, at that time revolutionary, innovations. Commonplace, ordinary, mundane, "boring" today, 16 years later.
Now, I'm no die-hard FPS fan. Nor do I feel that HL is THE greatest FPS, but it still bears thinking about.
Kudos on you for taking the time and effort to enjoy a piece of gaming history.
That's exactly what I meant.
I know HL was revolutionary at the time. I tried to play it then, but my computer at the time was a potato so I stuck with my PSOne. But even then, I could appreciate all the advances the game made. I really wanted to play it at decent framerate, but my PC-shaped toaster couldn't handle it. And I had no money.
Now I'm playing it mostly for historic value, but I have been spoiler by newer, flashier titles (not just graphically, but also in terms of storytelling and mechanics). That's why I'll never be able to enjoy it as much as someone who played it when it was new.
Half-Life's innovations that distinguished the game from it's contemporaries have been integrated into mainstream FPS's today, that's why I can't enjoy it as much as someone who played it then. For the same reason that I will not be impressed by a TV show proudly announcing that it's "In TECHNICOLOR" or "In STEREO". Those things are just a given today.
Examples: