I'm giving him that grace as well, at least let him have the chance. He'll still be better then Clooney.Ldude893 said:Hmmm.
I think I'm going to wait for an actual trailer to come out first. For all we know, he might do a good job as Batman.
I'm giving him that grace as well, at least let him have the chance. He'll still be better then Clooney.Ldude893 said:Hmmm.
I think I'm going to wait for an actual trailer to come out first. For all we know, he might do a good job as Batman.
As long as he does a voice. That's not his smug normal voice. He's need to acts as Batman, not be Ben Affleck in a batsuit.Robot Number V said:Then my second thought was "You know what? As long as he doesn't do the stupid Bale-voice, I'll give him a shot".
See Daredevil. It is an imperfect movie, but I think he was very good as Matt Murdock/Daredevil, which is a cross between a poor man's Spiderman and Batman.Jadak said:lol, he can play the character, but not that same character wearing a mask with (possibly) less dialog?schrodinger said:Welp, that's unexpected.
I guess he can play as Bruce Wayne, but as Batman?
Eh....
In any case, nope. Can't picture it.
Dang, you got here first! But your sentiments should be repeated over and over. I couldn't agree more.immortalfrieza said:Considering how good Daredevil was, and the fact that Daredevil was a pretty similar character to Batman, it'll be a good fit.
Oh, and Daredevil is one of the most underrated Superhero movies ever.
i am not the only one, yay!immortalfrieza said:Considering how good Daredevil was, and the fact that Daredevil was a pretty similar character to Batman, it'll be a good fit.
Oh, and Daredevil is one of the most underrated Superhero movies ever.
Apples and Oranges dude, people were dismissive of Ledger because they had no idea what he was capable of and I think people are dismissive of Affleck precisely because we do have an idea of what he is capable of.Karathos said:Scenario #1: "Waah waah waah, Heath Ledger is gonna be shit as the Joker!" - and then he wasn't, surprising quite a few people.
Scenario #2: "Waah waah waah, Ben Affleck is gonna be shit as the Batman!" - and then...
Stop crying bloody murder and wait for some actual footage. A throat-cancer voice and a workout routine does not a Batman make. Men in previous movies have portrayed the man quite well even though one pretty much expected them to completely blow it. Michael Keaton was not considered a fantastic choice at the time, and now it's heralded as the definitive classic.
Only if they did a reboot of the Adam West series. He'd be a perfect fit for thatKeyMaster45 said:Nathan Fillion should totally be the next Batman.
No argument here regarding Elektra. -_-StewShearer said:My rebuttal:Baresark said:Meh, I'm open to it. He was in some real stinkers, but he has also had plenty of great films in his career. He has always been a mixed bag as far as acting is concerned. I think he'll do fine as the Dark Knight. Also, Daredevil gets way more bad press than it deserves. That movie was very good compared to a whole lot of other movies out there, to be honest. But it was a fine retelling of a classic Daredevil tale. In all honesty, the thing that stunk that movie up was how Bullseye was represented. Elektra was pretty well handled, but not the sequel... that movie was truly terrible.
And yes, Elektra blew.
You just won this thread, well done!Phlakes said:![]()
I'd say something about how it would be better to wait and see how this turns out rather than freak about how Ben Affleck is going to personally burn every Batman comic and movie that's ever existed, but haters gonna hate.