I'm going to do a reverse choice here(Meaning: Best game to a Terrible Sequel): Mercenaries
layground Of Destruction > Mercenaries 2:World in flames.
Goodness, yes. They've learned how to make a game GOOD thanks to that. Kudos to them.Phlakes said:Just Cause 2. The first was so mediocre, but the second is one of my favorite games of the decade.
Oh yeah. Except for the bad voice acting in 2Phlakes said:Just Cause 2. The first was so mediocre, but the second is one of my favorite games of the decade.
can't agree moreAlternatePFG said:Mass Effect 1 feels like a chore to play. Although I feel like ME2 took out most of what made it an RPG, at least it was fun to play.icame said:Mass effect 2 (Oh shit!)
It didn't need to be streamlined, it needed to be fixed, and instead of doing that, BioWare just decided to take the lazy route and add a linear upgrade system for armor/weapons instead.duchaked said:can't agree moreAlternatePFG said:Mass Effect 1 feels like a chore to play. Although I feel like ME2 took out most of what made it an RPG, at least it was fun to play.icame said:Mass effect 2 (Oh shit!)
except I don't think it was like no longer an rpg, just streamlined to make it fun
if that's wrong i.e. not rpg then I don't want rpg (but that's not true, rpgs don't have to be un-fun haha)
I've played through Banjo-Kazooie but only played Tooie briefly, they seemed pretty much identical to me, what exactly did they fix? As I remember Banjo-Kazooie was pretty awesome and bug-free game. :lCorjha said:Banjo Tooie for N64. The sequel fixed every flaw the old one had.