Umm I don't think the viruses and diseases they are fighting against really have the money to pay. I could be wrong but I just can't see microscopic organisms having wallets big enough to pay. And if you are expecting the people who are effected by this to pay don't you think they would if they you know weren't to busy being poor and hungry.The_root_of_all_evil said:Again, I've said that it's a great thing he's done. But shouldn't that money be better coming from those responsible, rather than a donation from a figure rather synonymous with "lenient" business practices?Kajin said:Would you rather he not?The_root_of_all_evil said:Again, I'm sorry but...it's a lot easier to be a philanthropist once you have the money you've made off of other people.
OT: Bill Gates is an inspiration for rich people everywhere! Yay!
If I gave 2 thousand pounds to the RSPCA, would I even get a footnote in the papers?sgtshock said:True, but when's the last time you remember someone else donating 1/5th of their income to charity? Not to mention he plans to give most of the rest of his money to charity after he dies.
Yes, it's a good thing for the sufferers. I just don't believe we should be holding him as a saint. An example, maybe. Especially to the banks.
I never said it was a popular view. I expect polarisation here. I just hope the Foundation know how to deal with the lives they have just saved.Amarok said:You can't just scorn generosity like that because he can spare it. It's just a bit... grinchy.
He'd probably melt it down and turn it into more funds for more saving lives.AndyFromMonday said:The man deserves a statue made of pure gold.
Ho Ho...I think you understand I mean the people responsible to those sufferers.squid5580 said:Umm I don't think the viruses and diseases they are fighting against really have the money to pay. I could be wrong but I just can't see microscopic organisms having wallets big enough to pay. And if you are expecting the people who are effected by this to pay don't you think they would if they you know weren't to busy being poor and hungry.
That's where I'm coming from. There's a lot better places for $10 billion to go apart from saving lives that should never have been endangered. And it really rubs me the wrong way that it has to be a philanthropist who decides rather than a politician, a surgeon general or , god help us, a medical company.The fact that he had too do it pisses me off. Why can't we who have lots make the vaccines and give them to those who have nothing. Why does someone need to invest 10 million dollars to get this shit going? Why does the money factor the important factor and the human life factor is forgotten?
He already has one, probably.AndyFromMonday said:The man deserves a statue made of pure gold.
He retired like a year ago to work on saving the world.oppp7 said:Bill Gates is saving Microsoft's reputation by himself. It's strange that a company so well known for its cheapness has such a generous CEO.
It's not 1/5 of his income. It's 20% of his total value. He doesn't make $50,000,000,000 every year, I assure you.The_root_of_all_evil said:Sorry...
Bill is worth $50 billion. His house is worth $125 million.
Giving away 1/5 of his income has produced wonderful results, but would any of us be held in the same manner for similar donations?
Again, I'm sorry but...it's a lot easier to be a philanthropist once you have the money you've made off of other people.
His worth is 50 billion. That's not his income, that's the total value of everything he owns (unless I'm misunderstanding your statistic). I highly doubt that he brings in $50 billion annually.The_root_of_all_evil said:Sorry...
Bill is worth $50 billion. His house is worth $125 million.
Giving away 1/5 of his income has produced wonderful results, but would any of us be held in the same manner for similar donations?
Again, I'm sorry but...it's a lot easier to be a philanthropist once you have the money you've made off of other people.
Isn't that kinda how you make money to begin with or have I been missing something?The_root_of_all_evil said:Sorry...
it's a lot easier to be a philanthropist once you have the money you've made off of other people.