Billy Bob Blames Games for the Sorry State of Hollywood

RobfromtheGulag

New member
May 18, 2010
931
0
0
People used to make a fuss over Clockwork Orange. It's only going to get worse, and complaining about the state of things just makes you sound old.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Yeah, game's can't have a meaningful message.

Assassin's Creed doesn't raise any sort of philosophical questions about having to choose between free will and complete peace. All its about is stabbing dudes.

GTAIV doesn't provide a satirical look into American culture, which gives all sorts of messages. All its about is stealing cars and beating hookers.

Shadow of the Colossus isn't about how far some people will go for the one they care about, ignoring everything else just to help them. All its about is killing giants.

I could go on, but I think I've made my point.
 

PunkRex

New member
Feb 19, 2010
2,533
0
0
Delusibeta said:
PunkRex said:
Sir John the Net Knight said:
There's only one way I can respond to this...

[/QUOTE]

Is that artwork from Timesplitters, it looks like Captain Ash?[/quote]Nope. TF2. The Apple Update comic, I think. Or is it the Mann-Conomy comic?[/quote]

Oh cool, I read a little of the TF2 comic, should definatly go back and finish, thanks dude.
 

Electrogecko

New member
Apr 15, 2010
811
0
0
Diligent said:
Just watch this interview with Billy Bob if you haven't already, and tell me you can take anything that comes out of his mouth remotely seriously.
omg that was painful.
 

Littaly

New member
Jun 26, 2008
1,810
0
0
Dear lord -.-

While I think it's pretty annoying when gamers on principle give people the finger for criticizing the video game industry, this is not one of those cases. Billy Bob really doesn't have a clue of what he's talking about. My guess is that the only experience he's got with video games is his son playing Gears of War or God of War or whatever, and from that he draws a hasty conclusion that we must listen to because he's been in a couple of good movies.
 

Korolev

No Time Like the Present
Jul 4, 2008
1,853
0
0
Hollywood has always made bad films. The majority of films have always been bad films. You think films were any better in the 40's and the 50's? They weren't - they were just as hokey and cliched as they are now.

Ah he's just an old man who doesn't understand anything, in the midst of a crumbling career. Let's leave him alone.
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
15,014
3,880
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
ehh, when I see a movie I tend to look for a interesting plot before action, Im a gamer, if I want action Ill play a game
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,162
4,929
118
That's okay, Billy Bob; I blame my nightmares on your disgusting sexscene in Monster's Ball (I think we all know what that title is referring to).

You still kicked ass in Slingblade though.
 

samsonguy920

New member
Mar 24, 2009
2,921
0
0
I was just wondering when I was going to see Billy Bob in a movie next, and then I realize he has been making nothing but crap lately that I haven't wanted to see.
And he blames videogames?
Tell you what, when Clint Eastwood starts saying the same thing, I may agree.
Clint is the proof that Hollywood still puts out excellent movies.
 

FinalHeart95

New member
Jun 29, 2009
2,164
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
Billy Bob Thorton, the star of films like Telegraph [http://www.amazon.com/Eagle-Eye-Blu-ray-Shia-LaBeouf/dp/B001L57ZZ6/ref=sr_1_2?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1290634530&sr=1-2]. "They're geared toward the videogame-playing generation. And these videogames, which I'm on my son about constantly, these games are people killing for fun, and I think traditionally in movies, there's always been some kind of lesson in the violent movies."
*Double take*
Wait, wha--
Thorton's latest movie is called Dwayne Johnson [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1433108/], who's "on a bloody quest for revenge against the people who set him up." It sounds like a fairly straightforward Hollywood action vehicle but Thorton claimed there's a lot more to it.

"This movie doesn't say, 'Oh, here's this fun guy and we're going to do this tongue-in-cheek character right out of a videogame who likes to destroy things' and all this kind of thing," he continued. "This movie actually shows what prisons create, what murder creates. It shows this perpetual, violent string of events."
1) You were in a movie called Mr. Woodcock. Don't talk about "lessons".
2) Not all violent movies have lessons in them. In fact, a lot don't. What exactly was the message in Rambo?
3) Bioshock = violent. I think it has a better moral than all of your movies combined.
 

Rigor Morty

New member
Aug 18, 2010
4
0
0
Thats Saxton Hale. My Prime Minster (although Julia Gillard is PM on paper, he controls her). He destroys hippes and doesn't afraid of anything.
 

Razgovory

New member
Sep 27, 2010
18
0
0
Man, he looks creepy these days. Seriously though, movies from the 1970's are some of the worst creations of mankind and video games were not common then. Hell, there are countries that have never made a single good movie and don't have any video games.
 

V8 Ninja

New member
May 15, 2010
1,903
0
0
...Yeaaah, I'm TOTALLY going to believe a person that has been making bad movies for the past decade when he says that he knows the reason why Hollywood is making bad movies. [/sarcasm]
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
danpascooch said:
So....the person who is saying this made "Bad Santa"?

Wow, that's cute, not only does he make terrible movies, but then calls the rest of Hollywood terrible, and blames it all on something else entirely.

EDIT: "Faster" has a Metacritic score of 41, ROFL!
Indeed. I think Mr. Thorton needs to see his doctor about removing his foot from his mouth.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Raithnor said:
Therumancer said:
Truthfully I can't think of many games where you played as a "guy who kills people and destroys things for fun" there is almost invariably a storyline and reasons behind it.
Every game is a minor variation of GTA or online FPS Multiplayer apparently.

Considering Hollywood is considering making the Candyland board game into a movie to blame Hollywood being creatively bankrupt on video games is moronic at best.
I can't believe I'm about to say this, but to be honest I think it's about time on the Candyland movie. The version of Candyland I used to have as a kid had an insert telling what all the places on the board were supposed to be, and what was there, and it sounded pretty cool when I was that age. It captured my imagination.

As a result, aimed at the right audience, I can see this being successful. It's one of the things I would have wanted to see as a child.

Now, my concern is going to be if they ever decide to start taking commercial mascots like say "Captain Crunch" and making full length theatrical movies about them.


-

I wasn't focusing on Hollywood too much, but other than my mainstream criticisms, I think a big part of the problem is that there is a major focus on nostolgia movies. Taking properties from a few decades ago, updating them a bit, and then selling them to people who fondly remember the material.

See, one of the things about my generation "Generation X" is that we were "doomed" from the beginning. People knew this before we were born. Our parents generation lived long enough where they did not step down from the jobs they were holding and pass it on to the new generation. Thus they kept control of society and the money (as well has had longer to proliferate their morality than other generations). Only now with the Boomers nearing the edge of retirement and getting into position to flood the system is "Generation X" getting any kind of brief window where things are being aimed at us. We however produced very little as a generation, and most of the things that were produced FOR us were when we were younger as a way of marketing to our parents. Thus with "Generation X" being briefly viable to market to (with "Generation Y" rapidly becoming set to fully move into the boomers shoes) your seeing movies like "Transformers", "GI Joe", "The A Team", "The Dukes Of Hazard". It's proven to be a viable way to market to a generation that otherwise has little in the way of an identity, other than a lot of emo, and angst-ridden music and such that are what passes as the voice of our generation due to being skipped.

Dedicated sociologists can probably articulate it a lot better than I can, and in more detail. I think Hollywood is simply going where the money is.

I think you'll see more creativity for "Generation Y" to be honest. Truthfully, in the long run I think "Generation X" is going to be forgotten. We're pretty much going to be seen by many people as that wasteful generation that never went anywhere, had massive unemployment, and huge numbers of people living at home. Scholors will probably understand it better and pity us for falling between the cracks. The stuff your seeing recycled right now is pretty much the face of what defined a lost generation of people.