For the record, I don't like the term "pansexual". I mean, I don't doubt that pansexuals exist. But, to me, it just seems like a pretentious variation of "bisexual". I mean, if you're pansexual, you
are going to be dating both men and women (and everything in between, but intersex people are an extreme minority anyway, so they're not worth counting; trans people generally look like their according or identified gender); it's just that you put less emphasis on sex and more emphasis on personality. But since that's so grey anyway, there's no real point in creating
another term for it, when just saying "bisexual" should be enough.
This isn't a dig at pansexual people, by the way. I'm just saying that there's no need for a term that
does basically just say, "I'm a more colourful flavour of bisexual." No offence.
Arcane Azmadi said:
Hmm. I suppose you could consider me bisexual since I'm open to a relationship with anyone I find attractive- I just almost universally don't find men attractive. I'm attracted to femininity, not gender- I have already had several highly fulfilling sexual encounters with a pre-op male-to-female transexual with no personal doubts or hang-ups afterwards.
On the other hand, I consider male-to-female transexuals (even pre-op ones) to be women (on the grounds that, if that's what they say they are, who am I to argue with them?) so that confuses the issue a bit as I've never had sex with an unambiguous "man". I don't find men attractive at all, unless they're extremely feminine. So does that make me bi or straight? I honestly don't know, although I'm inclining towards bi.
That's somewhat like me, although I have found myself, on occasion, attracted to hypermasculine men. But, in general, I couldn't care less about genitalia, or whether or not you have breasts. As long as you have prominent nipples, a nice ass, thick and smooth thighs, and are reasonably attractive, I don't care what sex you are. It's just that those characteristics tend to fall more often on women than men.
So, if we're really going to use these flimsy labels, I'd say you're mostly heterosexual. Like most people. A lot of trans women, and even some transvestites, look pretty damn feminine anyway, and anyone who tries to call you gay for being attracted to a person who looks quite clearly feminine is just a dick. Only
you can and should be able to identify your own sexuality for yourself.
Although, I guess some people would call having a thing for extremely feminine men a fetish, but as I've explained above, I don't really like the way society defines fetishes, since social acceptance to certain sexual interests and practices fluctuates, like my example about homosexuality.