- Apr 29, 2008
To be fair I may agree to a point if this were a regular game company. But Blizzard is notorious for taking forever to finish a game with there when it's done philosophy. They prefer to do less and polish it up a lot. If they were the other kind of company I wouldn't expect SC2 to have a ton of missions but rather that we would be at like SC7 by now.Cynical skeptic said:Considering the eleven years between broodwars and starcraft 2, I'm pretty sure it'd be perfectly reasonable to expect something in the realm of 347 campaign missions in a single game.Eric the Orange said:no point in this. There is nothing they can say to make people stop what they think.
personally 30 missions is a full game to me. The first game only had 30. So to expect this one to have 90 is unfair of people. then again I play primarily for single player, I guess people who only play for multi-player may think otherwise.
I mean, it used to be if something took eleven years to make, there was an actual fucking reason beyond, "couldn't be arsed."
I mean, I do understand how people who could barely talk eleven years ago wouldn't be too bothered by this. They've been willingly taking it up the ass their entire lives.
I don't know if that last bit was pointed twords me but I do take offense if so. I'm 28 I was in high school when SC came out.