BigTuk said:
Not alienate well let's put it this way.. which is fairer.. thoseoversexualized characters that appeal half their base and modesty mods for those that don't ... or non sexualized figures that appeal to the otgher half and jiggle mods for the other half?
See this is why the discussion on such things goes nowhere.. it is pretty much a binary question.. who do you please the side you don't pick is always going to resent you foir making them do more workregardless of which side it is. Plus we've kinda seen the blizzacti isn't a big fan of their games being modded by third parties I mean look at D3?
Otherwise.. I am okay with mods and such seriously I am... but
It's really not a binary question, the thread in gaming discussion where many of the posters that regularly fall on the oversexualization side of the discussion are commenting about how they like the designs for some of the characters here is proof enough of that. If Blizzard adds some more diversity to the female body shapes with future characters, you will likely see the majority of people on both sides largely satisfied.
You will still get complaints form the fringes, people complaining that any sexy armor is unacceptable, and others accusing Blizzard of pandering to "feminists" because every single female model isn't sexy in exactly the way they want, but that's true of anything, you are never going to completely shut every last idiot on either side up entirely.
Treating it as a binary state limits plenty of options that will satisfy the vast majority of people that lie between the two extremes. There are plenty of games that come out where one side or the other tries to complain about it, but because it doesn't really set off most people on either side in a big way, those complaints are quickly discarded and lost in favor of games with more controversial material to grab on to.