Bus driver uppercuts woman

Recommended Videos

Lucane

New member
Mar 24, 2008
1,491
0
0
Tony said:
Rastien said:
SHORYUKEN!



I feel kinda bad for this, but it's the firs thing that came to mind.

No real opinion either way on the matter violence is violence :/ she was being a total tool though.
Damnit. I was thinking the same exact thing when I saw the thread title.
I'm sorry but I gotta ask...
What is your avatar from. It's so ... disturbingly wonderful looking.
 

Uhura

This ain't no hula!
Aug 30, 2012
418
0
0
AzrealMaximillion said:
You can't keep arguing this by throwing what ifs, what he should've dones, and hypothetical reactions that you have no way of predicting as points. It just becomes an everlasting debate where you keep pulling out more possible outcomes that did not happen.
That was a response to a hypothetical situation proposed by another forum member. I'm not coming up with 'what ifs' just for the fun of it.

AzrealMaximillion said:
I'm not here cheering for the driver either, but to say that what he did was excessive ignore a a bunch of things that me and you don't know about him. To be honest, being a bus driver is a shitty job. The driver had that job for over 22 years. This more than likely isn't the first time someone has:

a)tried to get on the bus with no money

b)threatened him with violence

c) assaulted him while he was driving

d)treated him like crap simply because he's a public servant

22 years of that is more than most of us can handle. He quite honestly may have had enough. He was 59 years old and to our knowledge has no history of uppercutting passengers before. He may have had to forcible remove erratic passengers before.
That doesn't in any way justify what happened. I think it's understandable that he lashed out, but there is really no reason to bring his work history into this discussion unless you actually want to use it to justify his actions. (Also, why are you bringing up hypothetical situations the driver may or may not have faced during his career?)


AzrealMaximillion said:
You're saying what he did was excessive. I'm saying what he did was understandable looking at him as one human being to another. I'm not justifying what he did, but I refuse to hold him up to some standard of a paragon human being that would have calmly dealt with this situation. He got angry and finally unleashed on someone.
No, I'm saying that what he did was excessive but understandable. I've mostly had beef here with people who praise his actions. What he did is done and no one can change that. What I find distasteful and kinda depressing is the amount of people here who think it's perfectly ok (and even funny) to hit someone on the head without any warning. Their reaction clearly shows that they have no idea how serious consequences that kind of attack may have.

It's possible to feel compassion for the guy and still think that what he did was excessive and that he is damn lucky nothing worse happened. That's why I linked those articles about the people who have died from just one punch to the head. You know, because I feel like we shouldn't be "loling" and cheering on real life violence. It's not a joke. The guy lost his job. It wasn't a joke to him.

AzrealMaximillion said:
And please, no more hypothetical points. Its kind of portentous no offense, as it implies that you know the situation better than those involved to such a point that you knew better.
Just like you don't know what kind of career he has had and what kind of situations he has faced. Just like you don't know if people would have reacted differently if he had punched a 25 year old guy or if he would have gotten in trouble if he had just thrown the girl out of the bus. You see, if you want to imply that other people are being pretentious with their hypothetical points, you may not want to make them yourself.
 

AzrealMaximillion

New member
Jan 20, 2010
3,216
0
0
Uhura said:
AzrealMaximillion said:
And please, no more hypothetical points. Its kind of portentous no offense, as it implies that you know the situation better than those involved to such a point that you knew better.
Just like you don't know what kind of career he has had and what kind of situations he has faced. Just like you don't know if people would have reacted differently if he had punched a 25 year old guy or if he would have gotten in trouble if he had just thrown the girl out of the bus. You see, if you want to imply that other people are being pretentious with their hypothetical points, you may not want to make them yourself.

There's a difference between my points and yours. With me I'm taking general probability into account considering the past 22 years of the driver's career up to this point. Chances of him having had to deal with erratic behaviour at least once in his 22 year career is pretty high. I'm not even going to go to the extent of researching where he was driving and the crime rates. That's an assumption that makes sense. I think we can all agree that bus drivers in generally populated urban areas get treated like crap by random assholes from time to time.

You're hypothetical points come off as trying to say that what you predict what would happen in what every situation you throw up is set in stone. There's no way to tell if the person who assaulted the bus driver would have backed down had the cops been called. You're predicting reactions to scenarios you set up. That's my beef.

And arguing hypothetical points with more hypothetical points is generally a waste of time as it diverts from what happened in general.

I get that you're not a fan of people praising what the driver did. But you're original post on this thread has garnered arguments for a reason.

Uhura said:
He clearly uses excessive force in handling the situation. She could have sustained serious injuries from that punch and I think it's pretty sad that so many people here seem to think that the driver's actions were somehow justified and reasonable.
I honestly don't think that he was at all concerned with the amount of force that he used when he struck her. People in physical altercations don't carry that in their head at the moment in time. I know I didn't when I was in fights in the past. He wasn't thinking clearly, obviously. He just reacted. Her getting hit was a result. Thankfully he had enough of a grip on his bearings to toss hear off the bus instead of going for punch number 2.

I even agree and have said that his actions were not justifiable, but to say that they were unreasonable is a bit portentous. Especially when considering the factors presented in the video itself. We can even take away the chances of violence and insanity that can occur in a bus driver's career completely. There is a reason he struck her. Not a great reason, but a human reason. He got sick of her egging him on and could not take another moment of it.

That's why I can look at the video and say, "I can see why he did that." Not saying I'd ever punch a women, but then again, I've never been put in a situation like that so I can never say never. I know people shouldn't be praising him for the punch, but to be honest given how things went down there was really no other way it could have happened unfortunately. People do things without thinking all the time. We live in a society where being a flawed person at certain points makes you a monster to some. Not saying you're calling him a monster, but to sit there and lecture others for merely being entertained in a situation where no one was put in the hospital is a bit much. Had he killed/seriously injured her, very few of the people on this thread praising the driver would be doing so, and anyone that did would most likely be verbally told to leave.


Look, we cheered Little Zangeif after he put a bully in crutches. We as a society told him he did nothing wrong. The bus driver reacted in the same way. He lost his job.

I found this incident interesting because the whole situation was stupid. And in the end they both learned something. He'll try not to slug people who piss him off, and she'll bring money to the bus stop and won't start a fight with the driver.
I can't speak for everyone but the majority of us who were entertained by this are not horrible people who live to see this stuff happen. To shame everyone who laughed at this is understandable, but my beef was with your use of hypothetical situations to argue hypotheticals.


That's like kicking water uphill, it's just come back all day.
 

Uhura

This ain't no hula!
Aug 30, 2012
418
0
0
AzrealMaximillion said:
You're hypothetical points come off as trying to say that what you predict what would happen in what every situation you throw up is set in stone. There's no way to tell if the person who assaulted the bus driver would have backed down had the cops been called. You're predicting reactions to scenarios you set up. That's my beef.
It's not that far fetched to think that a person would try to escape when threatened with cops. It's not like criminals or people who have just assaulted someone usually just wait around for the law enforcement to arrive if they have any chance to escape. And again, I did not start that string of "what ifs. I was responding to another poster.

I was also mostly referring to this part, where you predict what would happen if the "victim" wasn't a girl:

AzrealMaximillion said:
And I can guarantee we would not be having this debate if he had slugged a 25 year old man in the exact same manner. Hell, with the mainstream media and PC attitude that we have in Canada/The States, him simply throwing her off the bus would have been seen as bad due to him being a bigger man. There was next to no way he could win this by himself and look good.
Sounds pretty hypothetical to me.

AzrealMaximillion said:
I can't speak for everyone but the majority of us who were entertained by this are not horrible people who live to see this stuff happen. To shame everyone who laughed at this is understandable, but my beef was with your use of hypothetical situations to argue hypotheticals.
That's like kicking water uphill, it's just come back all day.
I didn't mean to imply that the people who were amused by the incident are somehow horrible people. I get why people think that she had it coming. I just found the cheering pretty depressing.

Ultratwinkie said:
Even then, it would require much more force for her to fall on the ground and die. A harder surface like concrete and have a MUCH higher velocity towards that floor.

The bus driver couldn't throw her hard enough to the floor that it would kill her.

Besides, a Satellite could fall on any one of us at any time, but does that mean we get to criticize NASA for the non existent satellite to COULD fall on us? No, because that is a stupid argument.
Really? How is saying that you shouldn't punch someone in the head because you might seriously hurt them in any way comparable to your example? Jesus...
 

AgDr_ODST

Cortana's guardian
Oct 22, 2009
9,317
0
0
she was raising hell and distracting the bus driver while he was trying to do his job, and even through the 'conductor' blocking the view partial it looks like she spit on him and then pushed him...this action could have caused the driver to lose control and everyone would be condemning the young lady...but because the driver was smart and stopped the bus that didn't happen. I'd say he was well within his right to 'push back' even if he did so in excess
 

Caverat

New member
Jun 11, 2010
204
0
0
Unless she attacked him when the camera cut to the side, I don't really see a justification for his punch. If she hit him, then yes, fair game. I just didn't see it in the video. Not touching the gender thing, as it isn't an issue with this. If you strike someone you deserve to be hit back regardless of gender on either side.

Edit: watched it again, had actually watched the mortal combat remix first, she clearly strikes him first. Justifiable punch.
 

Uhura

This ain't no hula!
Aug 30, 2012
418
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
Yeah, this "discussion" is completely pointless. I'm saying that people shouldn't punch others in the head (or anywhere else) because the consequences could be very serious. For some reason this point of view seems to annoy you.
 

Prosis

New member
May 5, 2011
214
0
0
Uhura said:
Ultratwinkie said:
Yeah, this "discussion" is completely pointless. I'm saying that people shouldn't punch others in the head (or anywhere else) because the consequences could be very serious. For some reason this point of view seems to annoy you.
So at what point is a person allowed to defend themself? And how are you allowed to defend yourself?
Is that really the state of America? That you have to be concerned with the health of a person who assaults you?
Were you ever beat up in highschool? Did you make sure not to bruise them too badly when you were defending yourself?

She hit him. She grabbed him by the neck, and spat on him. Tell me, was he supposed to wait until he had a concussion in order to retaliate? At what point would it have been "ok" for him to protect himself?

You realize this is why crime like this exists, right? Because people can act without fear of retaliation. The strong bully the weak, for the weak believe they don't have the right to fight back, or that its "dishonorable" to defend themselves.

I agree that fighting, punching, should only be last resort. But she had been relentless for several minutes, and she had already knocked his cell phone out of his hand. He could not run, nor retreat anywhere, nor call the police. And no one on the bus was helping. He was cornered, and out of options.
 

Uhura

This ain't no hula!
Aug 30, 2012
418
0
0
Prosis said:
Of course the driver had the right to defend himself. In my opinion the uppercut was an overreaction, but feel free to disagree. I haven't advocated pressing charges against the driver or punishing him in any way.

Ultratwinkie said:
Because you make it seem that if anyone takes a punch ever, they immediately die. The human body isn't that weak.

Your point of view is sensationalist at best. Whats worse is that when someone brings science and physics into the discussion, you backtrack.

There was no condition in that fight that could have killed her outside her own stupidity of messing with someone driving a vehicle. She had a scuffle with a normal bus driver, she didn't get into a fight with Bane on a god damn rooftop.
No, I haven't. I have over and over again said that hitting someone in the head may also seriously hurt them. You have latched on the 'one punch can kill a person' argument because it's easier to argue against it. So great, you argue against one point I have made and ignore the rest.

Then you try to legitimize your viewpoints by using "science and physics", which doesn't work because you ignore all the different variables in the situation. The different variables we can't actually count. Do you really think your analysis of the situation is in any way scientifically sound? It's based on a grainy youtube video and you act like you have done some legitimate scientific research.
 
Sep 15, 2012
53
0
0
[user]Uhura[/user], if you think we live - or should live - in a world where no one needs to use physical violence on others, do you also believe that we should not be verbally/mentally/physically harassed/threatened/insulted/demeaned? If so, how should one act when something like that is done upon him or her? How do you figure you would able to stop an unruly human yourself, when the bystanders will not intervene? Do you act against them, allow them to act this way upon you and take solace that they are wrong and you are acting the proper way?

But yes, striking the head is never good and should be avoided. I haven't seen the video and don't know what kind of nearby bystanders there were. If the driver was not certain that the nearby passengers would support him forcefully detaining the woman until the cops arrived then a blow to the head was justified. Without support from nearby passengers detaining her could bring about a bad case scenario of the detainee aggravating bystanders into action to their benefit, not to mention later 'female' claims.
 
Sep 15, 2012
53
0
0
matthew_lane said:
Kellogs Fried Chickn said:
[user]Uhura[/user], if you think we live - or should live - in a world where no one needs to use physical violence on others, do you also believe that we should not be verbally/mentally/physically harassed/threatened/insulted/demeaned?
Such a society cannot possibly exist. Conflict is built into every single species... Nor would you want to live in such a world.
Which was kind of my point. When confronted with an unruly aggressor she has to either become a conflicting party or allow the aggressor to live him or herself out on her.

Conflict isn't 'built into' any species. A species consists of many smaller regional groups, subregional, families and individuals, the more capacity one has the more varied group one is able to deal with. We start of by only caring about 'us', and we grow from there - well most of us.

You underestimate my fondness for dystopias, I'd take an agreeable authoritarian state over a bs democracy. But the big issue here is the bystander apathy or however you like to call it. People in crowds don't get involved when they really should, and that is something many aggressors actually exploit.
 

Whitbane

Apathetic...
Mar 7, 2012
266
0
0
Jesus, that was one hell of a punch. This accounts for the earthquake I felt and mysterious broken windows in my house not long ago. I was just waiting for "Fatality" to appear onscreen.
 

Uhura

This ain't no hula!
Aug 30, 2012
418
0
0
Kellogs Fried Chickn said:
[user]Uhura[/user], if you think we live - or should live - in a world where no one needs to use physical violence on others, do you also believe that we should not be verbally/mentally/physically harassed/threatened/insulted/demeaned? If so, how should one act when something like that is done upon him or her? How do you figure you would able to stop an unruly human yourself, when the bystanders will not intervene? Do you act against them, allow them to act this way upon you and take solace that they are wrong and you are acting the proper way?

But yes, striking the head is never good and should be avoided. I haven't seen the video and don't know what kind of nearby bystanders there were. If the driver was not certain that the nearby passengers would support him forcefully detaining the woman until the cops arrived then a blow to the head was justified. Without support from nearby passengers detaining her could bring about a bad case scenario of the detainee aggravating bystanders into action to their benefit, not to mention later 'female' claims.
I think we should strive towards a world where none of us is needlessly "verbally/mentally/physically harassed/threatened/insulted/demeaned?" There are obviously plenty of real life situations where following those rules is not possible/wise/needed. And as I have already mentioned, I'm fine with using violence in self defense, as long as the person doesn't go overboard with it. I'd advise you to watch the video because it really gives you a better idea of what happened. I think that the uppercut was excessive but there are plenty of other people here who disagree.
 

Ken Sapp

Cat Herder
Apr 1, 2010
510
0
0
Can't really tell too much from the video. But on the topic, be nice to people in customer service positions. They have to deal with the entire range of humanity from the truly angelic to the outright bastards, day in and day out and they are required to be courteous to a fault while doing it. Is it so hard to understand that they occasionally crack and flip out on some customer who likely deserves to be told off? It doesn't make overboard flip outs excusable but it is understandable. Can anyone really say that they could suffer the abuse that people in customer service professions deal with on a regular basis without reacting similarly or worse on occasion?
 

AngloDoom

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,461
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
Again, you cite the POSSIBILITY of her getting seriously injured the same way a paranoid man would say a satellite could fall on them if they leave the house.

She can get hurt in a lot of ways, especially standing next to a bus driver and distracting him. She could have fell when the bus stopped, hit her head, and became a brain dead vegetable.

The fact of the matter is she put herself in danger the moment she messed with that driver. Her safety doesn't matter when it comes to the safety of the bus itself and everyone in and around it. She couldn't listen to reason, and the only way to force her off is to actually be physical. Not try the "no boo boo" route, which never works in a real situation unless you have at least two people.

She gets a little boo boo? Too bad. Since she can't die or get actual brain damage just from that one punch, the worst she might get is a bruise. Those go away, and people move on.

You act like everyone falls apart if someone touches anyone else. She got stunned and tossed off the bus, that's it. You make it sound like she was thrown into a wood chipper by Hitler himself.
Oh, come on now. I've been watching this discussion for a while now and this is getting plain silly. You're comparing the dangers of a big man giving you a full-blown uppercut to stepping outside with a straight face and I honestly don't know how.

The simple question is, do you think that this man could have phoned the police or pushed the woman off of the bus without giving her an uppercut? If not then I respectfully disagree, but you seem to think the only way to deal with the situation is to go one step further than the person involved and that's how these things escalate.

It's understandable that the driver was shouting and insulting the woman in the video, but he should have kicked her off just for yelling at him down the bus. He kept her on the bus so he could argue with her, then from there the two kept things escalating until they ended up getting physical. Both are at fault, I'd say the woman more than the man, but neither acted as a sensible adult should have. I'm not saying I could have done better in the situation, but I certainly wouldn't say that was the only course of action once I'd calmed down.
 
Sep 15, 2012
53
0
0
Uhura said:
I think we should strive towards a world where none of us is needlessly "verbally/mentally/physically harassed/threatened/insulted/demeaned?" There are obviously plenty of real life situations where following those rules is not possible/wise/needed. And as I have already mentioned, I'm fine with using violence in self defense, as long as the person doesn't go overboard with it. I'd advise you to watch the video because it really gives you a better idea of what happened. I think that the uppercut was excessive but there are plenty of other people here who disagree.
Yes, strive toward such a world but you use the words needlessly and overboard. Should we find common parameters and teach them to the next generation, would it help? A little, but ultimately the aggressor and victim are the ones who have to determine the need and extent to which they need to act based on their perception of the situation. One nearby person without bystander apathy would resolve many of these public space conflicts.

Your advice remains unfollowed as I get the "account terminated" error and lack the interest to search for it.
 

AngloDoom

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,461
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
No, he couldn't. You know why?

You have to do it quick in a fight. The "no boo boo" route demands at least two people.

Why? Because you need 4 hands to hold down 4 limbs. If you just hold the hands, she knees you in the balls. If you hold her legs, she starts punching. If you try to tackle her and hold all her limbs down at once, you get charged with attempted rape. You need something that is clearly visible, and fast

In order to make it safe, you need a stunning punch and throw her out. Less contact with a fast response time.

Since the passengers couldn't help (the lazy fucks were trying to capture a youtube moment), you needed to go the hard way.
I was talking about a shove. As in, pushing your arms out quickly so that she stumbles out of the bus; something which is probably as fast (or faster) than winding your whole body down for a punch. I wasn't talking about grabbing her arms and leading her out of the bus.

Also, you really thing it's that easy to charge someone with rape? A bus full of people see a man, who has come under constant verbal assault, hold a woman down and suddenly they all say 'yup, rapist'. That's ridiculous sensationalism.

Secondly, American cops don't care. They will take too long to get there, especially in bad neighborhoods. They always do. The only time they respond quickly is when a gunman starts a massacre or when someone is dead.

A lot can happen in the 30-60 minutes they can take to get there. American cops have a lot to deal with, often with much worse crimes.
But he didn't even attempt it. Sure, a lot can happen in 30-60 minutes, but I'm not so sure a woman who'd be filmed assaulting and harassing a bus-driver while he was driving the bus would stick around to see what happened. Even if she did, he would have at least tried something passive first.

third, he didn't keep her on the bus. Stop making shit up.
I've seen plenty of people thrown off buses for less. The fact that she was still there and that he was arguing with her is due to the fact that he didn't do anything about it earlier. The man clearly isn't some patron saint of patience considering he's throwing immature insults back at immature insults, so why wasn't she thrown off earlier? I'd say it's because he was arguing with her, which in turn escalated the events.

Fourth, he cant be waiting around for cops. He has a job to do, and its his responsibility to remove the mentally unstable from the bus.
I'm not familiar with policies regarding bus-drivers in America, but I'm pretty sure he is not contracted to 'remove the mentally unstable from the bus' and I'm pretty sure that, if there are any rules regarding how to act when coming into contact with that kind of behaviour, you should shout insults back, get angry, and eventually uppercut her.

--

Look, in the end it comes down to a matter of viewpoints. I personally believe there were other roads this man could have taken that he didn't try, or at least the video didn't show him try, and that means he used excessive force in my mind. I don't think the uppercut shown in that video is a 'quick stun', but a full blown punch with weight behind it. It doesn't look at all as if that man held back on his punch and that's where, to me, it becomes apparent that he'd lost his temper and just wanted to hurt somebody.

Just as how you accused Uhura of making out people are made of glass, I'm going to go ahead and say you're making people out to seem as if they're all made of iron. That woman was not a threat to such a large man as to warrant such force. She was probably half his weight: it'd be equivalent to me punching a 5.5st (77lbs) teenager with all the weight I had behind it because we were bickering. You think that's justified, I don't, so I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on this one, okay?