canadamus_prime said:
But we don't want fewer real guns in the hands of people now do we?
That's a pretty unfair statement. Feinstein is
also one of the Senate's staunchest gun-restriction advocates. Now, if say... a Republican would be trying to restrict guns in video games, then that would indeed be hypocritical.
Broken Blade said:
What an idiot. And she's MY f*cking senator. Why do people keep voting for her?
Because apparently you failed to vote in the primaries.
CriticalMiss said:
'Out of touch old woman angry at vid-yo-gayums' would make a better headline. How do these people get voted in to power?
Believe it or not, there are more pressing issues in a society than video games. If I saw a candidate who embodies everything I believe,
except on the issue of video games, I would still vote for that person, because hell: when else are you going to find someone who embodies everything you believe?
And on the matter of Feinstein, I'm not saying I agree with
everything she stand for, but she is none-the-less an impressive woman, who has done much for women's rights, immigration and gay rights. Would I vote for her in the primaries? No, probably not. But she'd still win, because she's so popular with the voters.
So I would still end up voting for her in the senate race. Because, after all, a Democrat is still always better than a Republican. And I would much rather have a Democratic senator who battles against real guns, than a Republican senator who leaves digital guns alone.