So, some twat with a faux-hawk and guided questions is considered results, now? Well, hot damn, science just got easier! Anecdotal evidence is accepted! BTW, guys--Superpowers exist! I have them! But I'm not gonna show you. You just gotta take my word for it, okay?
Anyways, blatant disregard for the acquisition of acceptable results aside, yes, it's certainly possible. When you're not dealing with almost obviously testosterone driven men discussing the girls that friend zoned them, your results will change. If a single sexual thought, or non-amicable thought, ever crossed your mind about someone you consider a friend, this does not automatically mean if you don't bang them the friendship is over. That's similar to saying that if you've ever had a single thought about politics, you should run for government. "Oh man, I really like her, but she won't do me, so I can't ever be around her again!" is the disparaging cry of the emotionally immature.
Of course that thought will happen. It's freaking biological. Friendship is in part about accepting that fact, and acknowledging the other person for attributes beyond 'boinkable'. Attributes like sense of humor, or intelligence, or a similar history. Hell, your relationship grows when you share such things in common, but just because you refrain from jumping into bed with someone doesn't mean all that just hangs around as sexual tension between you. You incorporate those things into the friendship instead of into a loving desire.
I hope he fails whatever project that was for. I hope his professor pans the report and the process, explaining in great depth why he failed it, and how data needs to be objective, rather than subjective, and that destroying validity by suggesting meaning to the people you're asking meaning of results only in wasted time. Universe, make this happen, please.
Anyways, blatant disregard for the acquisition of acceptable results aside, yes, it's certainly possible. When you're not dealing with almost obviously testosterone driven men discussing the girls that friend zoned them, your results will change. If a single sexual thought, or non-amicable thought, ever crossed your mind about someone you consider a friend, this does not automatically mean if you don't bang them the friendship is over. That's similar to saying that if you've ever had a single thought about politics, you should run for government. "Oh man, I really like her, but she won't do me, so I can't ever be around her again!" is the disparaging cry of the emotionally immature.
Of course that thought will happen. It's freaking biological. Friendship is in part about accepting that fact, and acknowledging the other person for attributes beyond 'boinkable'. Attributes like sense of humor, or intelligence, or a similar history. Hell, your relationship grows when you share such things in common, but just because you refrain from jumping into bed with someone doesn't mean all that just hangs around as sexual tension between you. You incorporate those things into the friendship instead of into a loving desire.
I hope he fails whatever project that was for. I hope his professor pans the report and the process, explaining in great depth why he failed it, and how data needs to be objective, rather than subjective, and that destroying validity by suggesting meaning to the people you're asking meaning of results only in wasted time. Universe, make this happen, please.