I would like to take this opportunity to point out that those expecting the PC version to be superior or hell, let's start with functional, haven't experienced recent Capcom attempts at PC ports of their games.
Assumptions, assumptions everywhere! Surprise, I can see the difference between 30 and 60. I can tell when a PC game is rendered at a resolution lower than it's supposed to be. Don't assume, infer. I never inferred anywhere that 30 was suitable for fast paced games. I never inferred anything that you accuse me of saying or being.Hammeroj said:No, 30 isn't bad to you. To most people who are used to gaming on 60 FPS, it's night and day. 30 can and does indeed look really choppy and uncomfortable (with this problem rising the faster paced the game is). You may also be one of the people who don't see the difference between 480p and 720p (or higher). What then? People who don't appreciate games being capped at crappy resolutions are elitists? Get real, would you.thesilentman said:30 isn't bad, it's just thatsomeALL PC gamers get a kneejerk reaction to not being able to play games in 60. It's some sort of elitism factor here.
My personal thoughts? It's elitism as usual and the FPS on my TV won't appear to make a difference but my computer monitor will. I don't care a single bit as long as the game is fun.
I don't know what you're thinking, but the word 'elitist' isn't the worst descriptor of a person, especially when you're using it in a context like this.
This is like the Inception of ignorance, there are just so many concentric layers of dumbness in what this guy is saying.me reading it said:Capcom
What R U Doin"60 FPS is a speed the brain and the eye can catch up with and understand," he said.
Capcom"But at 30 FPS there's a technique where you take advantage of the brain's ability to fill in the blanks. So even though you have it running at 30 FPS, you create the motions and the poses in such a way that the brain will naturally fill in what would have been the extra frames."
StahpItsuno pointed out that 60 FPS would be "better," but went on to claim that long gaming sessions at higher framerates have a tiring effect on payers' eyes because the frames "almost shake or flash."
WaitWHAT said:The gameplay and story are going to be 100x more important than whether the framerate is 30 or 60.
What he meant was that the previous DMC games never had story as their.... strongsuit while gameplay is something DMC does best.WaitWHAT said:What? Story and gameplay are less important than 60 vs 30 fps?ResonanceSD said:"gameplay"
"story"
Two words never before used in a sentence with DMC, unless laughter follows.
Also yes, if I've paid in excess of $1000 Australian Dollars for my graphics cards (that's about $1 trillion USD) I'm going to go ahead and expect that the game industry actually releases stuff that takes advantage of it, instead of endlessly pandering to the PS3 hardware.
And at the very least, not lying about the fact that there's no visual difference between them.
So...what you're saying is that if somehow, by some magic space miracle, the new DMC is the most amazing work of art created, that'll matter less than whether it has 30 or 60 fps? OK, that's unlikely, but if it did happen, guess which would be more important?
Besides, leaving aside the fact that this won't even affect P.C. gamers (no matter what their rig, the games industry does *not* have an obligation to kill itself to justify your latest graphics card just because you got hit by diminishing returns. [sub][Hd 7850 =£150, GTX 670=£300, GTX 670 < 2x(HD7850)][/sub] If a game is still perfectly functional at 30fps, and it is, since film developers seem to have managed fine on 24 for the last upteen years, then that's all a developer needs to do. Would you rather that they spend 20% of the budget on eye candy and 80% on story and gameplay or made it a 50-50 split, resulting in an infinitely inferior game? No, that's stupid.
Graphical fidelity is not as important as story and gameplay.
End of. Now stop being so silly.
yes, it requires 2x the processing power of computer for no gain. synchronizing with monitor is good and so, but it can be done with 30 (now 35 for example would be a problem, or if you use one of those monitors that run on 80 hz, but those are kinda extinct now).And yes, there's a huge difference between 30 and 60 fps.