Once again you prove incapable of considering context.Saelune said:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImplicatureAbomination said:Quote me specifically saying that sexism doesn't exist.Saelune said:You want to pretend sexism doesn't exist. I am not the toxic one here.
I know it exists, I see it spilling from your mouth half the time. Apparently, my opinion is flawed because I'm male.
You do realize just because you dont literally say something, doesnt mean you arent blatantly implying something?
You want to downplay the importance of a female superhero like Captain Marvel, you're not doing this on accident. By trying to dismiss the importance, you are trying to dismiss the plight women face in our sexist reality. Stop it.
Just because I find the emphasis the advertising placed on Captain Marvel being a woman as a point against it, does not mean I am dismissing the issues women can face.
Just because I am not literally saying something doesn't mean I am blatantly implying something either.
She's a MCU superhero. The movie was alright. Her sex had nothing to do with the story or character - which is fine, films do not have to make the sex of their character important to the plot. Just like how Miles' ethnicity had nothing to do with the story of Spider-Verse, it was flavour and a characterisation.
It was a film with a female hero. It's not an anomaly. It is not as common, sure, but it's hardly groundbreaking. It's great that it exists and has done well at the box office. I hope it shows that investors need not be afraid to put more women in roles for films like this. That said, it didn't succeed BECAUSE it had a female lead - it was probably going to succeed anyway because it's a MCU film and Endgame is around the corner.
We do not want the sex of the protagonist to matter - so it's probably best we stop trying to make it matter. I would find the advertising push equally as awkward if it was placing emphasis on the fact the protagonist is a male.