Cerberus Gears Up in First Mass Effect 3 Screenshots
- Thread starter Tom Goldman
- Start date
I had her with me in one run and she was like WTH when he told us to keep it for him and she quits them right there if she is in your run, garrus was the only one in the runs that i did was like good idea lets keep it, think even grunt was like screw this when he asks for it.Stevepinto3 said:Miranda is for it I believe. Though if you talk with your squad members afterward every single one of them will say that destroying it was the right decision, even Miranda. So either they simply made a bad call on the spot or the writers screwed up.cerebus23 said:SIgned and apparently not handing it over was the "canon" choice since it seems even if you did turn that stuff over they are going to try to kill you. Since when was it a good idea to monkey around with reaper tech anyway? when exactly has to not blown up in peoples or aliens faces? Add to that the monsterous thought of using living beings to fuel that damn thing wth could you be thinking exactly to say oh well if it is for the team here you go chain smoking creepy dude. I expect bioware to retcon it so that a device ends up corrupting all of cerberus to kill you if you did take that side for some unknown and silly reasonStevepinto3 said:.
JUst look at your team after that i think the only one is for handing it over is garrus (which made me want to scream WTF at him) i do not think there was one other member on the team that thought giving him that was a good idea.
i really hope to god the game will still let the Adept class do well. I had the most fun playing that class in ME2. not having to use any ammo to destroy your foe never gets old.
From all i've read on ME3 its like their focus is purely on guns and melee
Long range biotic death is win dammit! >.<
From all i've read on ME3 its like their focus is purely on guns and melee
Long range biotic death is win dammit! >.<
He's Martin Sheen. If you can't trust Martin Sheen, who can you trust?Stevepinto3 said:
Kind of disappointed that this plot concept, I actually liked the Illusive Man just because he was very Machiavellian in his planning. To be honest I like him better then the Council just because he was pragmatic and not just ignorant and incompetent.
WTF CERBERUS! I HELPED YOU GUYS! IT COST YOU BILLIONS OF CREDITS TO BRING ME BACK TO LIFE AND NOW YOU WANT TO KILL ME AGAIN?
I handed it over to him because I thought he'd use it to save humanity or whatever. Now I'm starting to regret that.Stevepinto3 said:
Irridium said:
Heehee! Perfect. My brain just wasn't working yesterday morning. It had been nagging me all day that I couldn't think of anything.Proverbial Jon said:
Someone should start up a Horatio Caine service, for all those moments that call out for disturbingly corny puns.
Go figure. The Engine does look the same. But they may end up just building upon it and only changing a few things here and there. I don't mind, ME2 had a really good engine to begin with but had a few trips and falls here and there.
Although the premise going to be a tough sell from ME2 to magically have Cerberus go all Space-Al-Qaeda on you again.
Although the premise going to be a tough sell from ME2 to magically have Cerberus go all Space-Al-Qaeda on you again.
Graphics are fine. Games are becoming too expensive to make as it is. I'd rather them work on gameplay than making it look pretty.urprobablyright said:
Fixed it for youCosmicCommander said:
Seriously, Mass Effect 2 might have been lacking a little in the RPG department, but it was still a very good game. DA2, on the other hand...[footnote]I did actually like DA2, but it was so half-assed as to be ridiculous.[/footnote]I'm looking forward to this game, but I still think that it's stupid for Bioware to have Cerberus turn on us for the sole benefit of providing humanoid enemies. It's not as if we don't already have enough to deal with