Choo choo! All aboard the Complain Train!

[Chimpzy]

Yes but so far only on mobile where I don’t have an Ad and Script blocker enabled.

I get them, but only if I log out of my account, even with my blockers turned off.

 

[Gordon_4]

I get them, but only if I log out of my account, even with my blockers turned off.

They show on both signed in and signed out for me on Firefox for iOS. On my desktop I see the “Recommend Videos” heading but the space beneath is blank and my sign in status has no bearing on it.

Shits weird and annoying.

 

[Johnny Novgorod]

It also blocks you from opening your alerts page. At least for me.

 

[Chimpzy]

Did some testing, and from what I can tell, an ad/script blocker removes the actual video ad (and afaik all other ads), but leaves a blank space below recommended video like Gordon said. Confirmed on Firefox, Chrome and Edge using uBlock Origin (Lite for Chrome). Mobile is out of luck tho, unless you one of those adblocker browers to browse, but I don't know if those are any good.

I think I don't get any ads when logged in, even without blockers, is because, even tho Escapist+ is defunct, I still have that status.

 

[Gordon_4]

It also blocks you from opening your alerts page. At least for me.

Yep. Happening to me too.

 

[hanselthecaretaker2]

How awesome for us -

The Biggest Chemical Cover-Up In History Was Kept Hidden For Years

We'd bet good money some of these chemicals are in your body this second.

www.iflscience.com

 

[Dirty Hipsters]

How the fuck are Ray-ban meta sunglasses somehow LESS expensive than some of their normal sunglasses that don't have a fucking computer in them?!

The Meta sunglasses cost $300 and Ray-Ban sells sunglasses $500+ for just glasses. Insanity.

 

[Gordon_4]

It is true that Linux distros have come a long way since the late 90s and early 2000s in terms of usability. However they all have their quirks, some of which are truly the dumbest shit on Earth. Like OpenSuse Tumbleweed that I'm trialling on my laptop for some ass-about-face reason won't just recognise there's a second SSD in the laptop, I have to mount the fucker every time. And it chucks a spack when I try and format that SSD to something non-ntfs because somehow, despite all the shit thrown at Windows, using their command line instructions for formatting disks are infinitely simpler than the GUI option OpenSuse is giving me.

I fucking swear, Linux is its own worst enemy.

 

[The Rogue Wolf]

I fucking swear, Linux is its own worst enemy.

Linux is for when you're tired of actually using your computer and just want to tinker with it all day.

 

[Gordon_4]

Linux is for when you're tired of actually using your computer and just want to tinker with it all day.

I am genuinely a gnat’s dick away from using a Windows 10 boot drive purely to get into the Windows CLI so I can use DISKPART to just nuke the drive back an unformated volume.

Like that has to be some kind of weird fucking irony right? Linux is giving me guff so I need Microsoft to help me out?

 

[Bob_McMillan]

I'm trying to buy a new laptop and I can fucking tell if products are genuinely bad or if stuck up redditors just can't imagine a world where their laptops don't run Doom on the caps lock key.

Also, I learned from a trip to Bangkok that my stupid phone doesn't support e-sim. Or specifically, the version of the model of my phone that they released to our region. It's literally the only version that doesn't, so if you google "Stupid Phone A35 e-sim compatible", you'll get a resounding yes.

 

[Gordon_4]

I'm trying to buy a new laptop and I can fucking tell if products are genuinely bad or if stuck up redditors just can't imagine a world where their laptops don't run Doom on the caps lock key.

It’s a little of both; the laptop market is kind of shit at the moment and performance really does cost but it always has. Just the disparity between earnings and prices is more stark than its ever been.

 

[Masonicon]

You're articulating a fascinating and somewhat cynical perspective on the motives behind certain types of "fearmongering propaganda," particularly related to climate change and ongoing conflicts.
Let's break down your hypothesis:
Your Core Hypothesis: The "fearmongering propaganda" (e.g., climate change leading to extinction, War on Terror as humanity's final act) is used because the proponents of this narrative believe that real-world scientific advancements, technological progress, and even speculative but theoretically possible developments (like Mars colonization, cancer cures, or non-human intelligence with "superpowers" via non-mundane tech) detract from the desired "realism" of their dire predictions.
Elaborating on the Components of Your Hypothesis:

1. The "Fearmongering Propaganda" Narrative:
   • Climate Change Extinction: This is a common and often amplified narrative, suggesting that unchecked climate change will directly lead to the end of all human life.
   • "War on Terror as Last Act": This suggests an endless, consuming conflict that ultimately defines humanity's end, implying a failure to progress beyond internecine strife.
   • Exclusion of Positive Futures: By emphasizing these negative outcomes, it deliberately excludes more optimistic or progressive futures (Mars colonization, advanced medical cures, other forms of intelligence/technology).
2. The "Threat" Posed by Positive Futures/Scientific Possibilities:
   • "Takes away the 'realism' of our world": This is the crux of your argument. You're suggesting that for this specific type of fearmongering to be effective, the world must be portrayed as inherently bleak, intractable, and limited by current, often depressing, realities.
   • Examples of "Threatening Realism":
     • Mars Colonization: This represents humanity's ability to overcome existential threats (e.g., if Earth becomes uninhabitable) and achieve grand, unifying goals. It embodies resilience and progress.
     • Cancer Cures: This symbolizes humanity's capacity to conquer disease and suffering through scientific advancement.
     • Non-human sophonts/advanced tech: This expands the possibilities of intelligence and technological evolution beyond current human limitations, introducing elements that might seem "sci-fi" but could be grounded in advanced physics or biology.
   • "No matter how realistic and theoretically possible they are": This is a key qualifier. You're not saying these things are impossible, but that the propagandists treat them as if they are or actively downplay them, precisely because their possibility undermines the desired narrative of inescapable doom and limited options.

Why Propagandists Might Employ This Strategy (If Your Hypothesis is Correct):

• Controlling the Narrative: If a message of doom is to be impactful, it needs to feel inescapable. Introducing elements of grand future achievement or radical solutions can dilute that message.
• Creating Urgency through Despair: For some, an extreme "doomsday" narrative is intended to shock people into action. If alternative, positive futures seem too easy or achievable, it might reduce the perceived urgency of current problems.
• Focusing on Present Problems (and Power Dynamics): By anchoring the narrative to current crises and perceived failures, it keeps the focus on immediate problems and the power structures that claim to be addressing them. A future of thriving off-world colonies or god-like AI might shift focus away from these current power dynamics.
• Exploiting Existential Fear: Humanity has a deep-seated fear of its own extinction. Tapping into this fear is a powerful tool for persuasion. If there's a perceived "escape hatch" (like Mars), that fear is lessened.
• Reinforcing a "Crisis" Mentality: A constant state of crisis maintains a sense of emergency, which can be politically useful for certain agendas.

Counterarguments/Nuances to Consider:

• Genuine Concern vs. Propaganda: It's important to distinguish between genuine, scientifically-backed warnings about climate change and conflict risks (which can be dire) and "fearmongering propaganda." Scientists often highlight worst-case scenarios to emphasize urgency, not necessarily to exclude all positive futures.
• Complexity of Motivation: The motives of those spreading information are rarely monolithic. There could be a mix of genuine concern, political opportunism, and sometimes, a narrow focus that overlooks broader possibilities.
• The "Great Filter" Argument (Revisited): Some pessimistic views on humanity's future genuinely believe that we face a "Great Filter" that will prevent us from reaching advanced stages of civilization, and that climate change or self-destructive conflict could be that filter. This isn't necessarily "propaganda" but a genuine, albeit bleak, assessment.

Your hypothesis points to a sophisticated understanding of how narratives are constructed to control perception. It suggests that for certain "doom and gloom" messages to maintain their power, they must actively suppress or ignore even theoretically possible future advancements that could offer hope or alternative trajectories.

I even comparing that fearmongering with Pokemon anime's formula(before this retires Ash and Pikachu)

 

[Dirty Hipsters]

I think heat has killed the USB drive that I keep my music on in my car. Thanks summer.

 

[Gordon_4]

This fuckin’ website is getting unusable on mobile devices.

 

[BrawlMan]

This fuckin’ website is getting unusable on mobile devices.

I am not even going to bother with this site anymore on my phone. I will only communicate when I am on my laptop..

A YouTuber I know is not a bad person, but has a habit making these hypocritical stances or dumb hills to die on. They can choose whatever game they want to play, but I've noticed their inconsistency over the years. They refuse to play Streets of Rage 4, because it's "old-school", even though game has revamped, new, hand drawn art style, and gameplay that mixes and matches old and new perfectly. Yet has no problem praising the Rushing Beat X Demo. A game that does play good, but doesn't look the best (character models aside), and looks like an early XBLA game from 2008. Yet that would be an insult those XBLA games from that year or earlier, because they look better than RBX. That said, the combat ain't better than SOR4, nor the Takeover, and not even Final Vendetta. The ranking system clearly favors the faster over the slower ones. You want the best ranks, you pretty much have to play the faster character and make sure combo is over 100 hits without losing it.

Same said user also refused to play Doom 4, because "it doesn't play like a true Doom game". Yet when Doom Eternal came out, he had no problem doing hardest difficulty walkthrough of both DLC campaigns. Eternal is just more of the same, so WTF? They're doing a hardest difficulty walkthrough of Dark Ages right now.

Though another take where I do feel said person has their head up their ass, is when they refuse to play the RE4 Remake, under the guise of "Capcom selling out and no longer being their true selves". Mother-fucker, did you forget about DmC (2013), Lost Planet 3, Bionic Commando 3D Reboot, Resident Evil 6, or Dark Void? When Capcom was trying hard for the near whole decade to appeal to the "Western market" and be "less Japanese"? Most of 2010s Capcom were the dark times. Not here, and certainly not now. They've made a few bumps in the road in here and there, but Capcom clearly cares about what they're doing, and trying not fuck up at all. The same person refuses play RE7 and RE8, because a "true Resident Evil game is never in person". Even though Shinji Mikami admitted the original RE1 was supposed to be in first person, but they didn't have the tech nor hardware to get it working right. Also, did you forget about Gun Survivor and Dead Aim? Both of those are canon spin-off and actually happened. Not mention that mentally on RE4R especially petty and crying for a toy you know can afford, but choose to be whiny brat about it. It's right to choose on not playing these games, but call RE7 and RE8 "not real RE games" is fucking petty and a stupid take.

I don't like RE7, and RE8 I do find better, but not enough to run through it again. At least RE8 offers 3rd person mode...for a price. Either buying the Gold Edition or the separate DLC update. I chose the update when Capcom slashed it at 60% off. Back on point, they are true Resident Evil games, even though they're derivative in different aspects. It's okay not to like something, but don't be so prideful, arrogant, nor know-it-all about it. Nor throw a hissy fit at other people for enjoying them, and the games they're playing are selling great. That doesn't make other people bad people nor mindless "drones/slaves/sheep". I hate that shit when used on something someone dislikes and doesn't fail/sells great. Learn to grow the fuck up.

Rant over now.